Nick Fuentes yesterday calling Alex Jones paid/fake opposition was a great move. The more the guys like Stew Peterson and Nick Fuentes and Keith Woods and TRS and Ryan Dawson can all chip away at Alex Jones, the better. The way Alex interviewed Stew on Monday was unprofessional and unserious. The amount of money he is getting under the table to push the Trump Israel-first narrative must be in the 7 figure a year range.
OR... You can simply take AJ for all the other things he says that are valid, and be aware of the JQ.Yeah, the recent fuentes and stew peters appearances on infowars should end any and all assertions that AJ is a genuine truth teller / honest dissident / uncontrolled independent broadcaster etc. Maybe at one point in his career that could have been the case, but his aversion to engage with the subject of jewish power (and in fact constantly dodging, strawmanning, and equivocating away all dialogue about it) speaks volumes.
It is obviously a dangerous subject for any public figure to broach. But with all the momentum in the past year, from "death con 3" to "ban the adl" to now the majority of zoomers favoring hamas over israel, someone with AJ's reach and influence giving even a milquetoast acknowledgement about the jewish lobby could really drive the public conversation.
You could make a charitable case that just by AJ platforming these other people, he is voicing an opinion that he himself is afraid to state. But that doesn't seem to be the reality. To me, his refusal to look at / talk about the clearly jewish roots of all the social and political evils that he lectures against shows his true intentions.
Nick reviewed Stew's interview on InfoWars and eviscerated Alex Jones for his performance. His repeated lies about the Hitlers, the ChiComs, the Holocaust, it gets so old.Yeah, the recent fuentes and stew peters appearances on infowars should end any and all assertions that AJ is a genuine truth teller / honest dissident / uncontrolled independent broadcaster etc. Maybe at one point in his career that could have been the case, but his aversion to engage with the subject of jewish power (and in fact constantly dodging, strawmanning, and equivocating away all dialogue about it) speaks volumes.
It is obviously a dangerous subject for any public figure to broach. But with all the momentum in the past year, from "death con 3" to "ban the adl" to now the majority of zoomers favoring hamas over israel, someone with AJ's reach and influence giving even a milquetoast acknowledgement about the jewish lobby could really drive the public conversation.
You could make a charitable case that just by AJ platforming these other people, he is voicing an opinion that he himself is afraid to state. But that doesn't seem to be the reality. To me, his refusal to look at / talk about the clearly jewish roots of all the social and political evils that he lectures against shows his true intentions.
Beautiful to see!
OR... You can simply take AJ for all the other things he says that are valid, and be aware of the JQ.
He doesn't harp on the Khazarian Mafia element of our body politics so he can teach more people...that are just not able to accept the entirety of the red pill all at once...
It could be that by continuing to be intellectually curious one sees more of the truth through AJ and gets to that conclusion thereafter.
Afterwards Stew had Nick on to talk about the interview. Here is a snippet of it.
I think it is fair criticism to point out Jones doesn't talk about this subject, no matter what. But if you want to go down this line of "it is too dangerous" then...It's odd to me that some of you would criticize Jones for avoiding the JQ, you do know that he would get JFK'd right?
What about Sandy Hook did he say/do that was so egregious?I know there are bad people in the world with well kept secret plans, but this video demonstrates how hard it is to tell and sell a compex lie with lots of moving parts (5D chess). In the video there is a simple scene between Zuckerberg and Gates in which they are attempting to "act" (i.e. lie), and due to their lack of acting talent and training the scene is basically unwatchable, much less is it believable (and no, they're not "reverse bad acting" which is even more difficult than regular straight forward acting). So this is something to consider when analyzing the behavior and words of these two polarizing figures, they are both horrible at acting, and hence lying.
I know he has gotten some big things right, but with regards to Alex, it is most likely that Alex is "just Alex." He seems to me to be emotionally winging it and I'm not sure if he even knows what he's doing most of the time. The Sandy Hook thing in particular makes me question his judgment. He's definitely not low IQ, but he's also not the sharpest tool in the shed. I also can't see a guy like him being easy to control in a 5D chess game, he wears his heart on his sleeve, shoots from the hip, and has unpredictable mood swings. The mood swing thing could however make him a naturally gifted actor capable of lying to our faces without us noticing, so that is something to consider.
I don't believe anything except that he somehow got his as* handed to him on the subject. How do you even get involved with a school massacre of children in a negative light? I'm not sure what he did/said as I didn't pay attention. But I saw it on TV which means whatever he did, it's real, and it's "something" (according to MSM he was either claiming it didn't happen or it was a false flag). Even if that something was just running his mouth at the wrong place, at the wrong time, on the wrong subject. Like I said, he ain't the sharpest tool in the shed. He of all people should know that there are forces of power larger than him out there that are not to be messed with. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.What about Sandy Hook did he say/do that was so egregious?
Don't tell me you believe the false statement said about him by the liberal judges and media...
I don't believe anything except that he somehow got his as* handed to him on the subject. How do you even get involved with a school massacre of children in a negative light? I'm not sure what he did/said as I didn't pay attention. But I saw it on TV which means whatever he did, it's real, and it's "something" (according to MSM he was either claiming it didn't happen or it was a false flag). Even if that something was just running his mouth at the wrong place, at the wrong time, on the wrong subject. Like I said, he ain't the sharpest tool in the shed. He of all people should know that there are forces of power larger than him out there that are not to be messed with. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.
I know, he's a victim, he was framed, it was just bad luck. At some point there has to be logical consequences for one's actions and life choices. So you want to be a famous attention whoring millionaire who peddles supplements and "health" products while you sit there on your fat as* looking like you're about to keel over from a coronary? Well then, this is what you get.
And his whole Lizard People shtick is annoying too, show us proof, or shut up about idiotic stuff that can't be verified. When is the reservoir of attention and money filled? If you're serious, take your money, disappear, and work asymmetrically and anonymously underground to destroy the "elites" (who you won't name because you're a JQ denier who's married to a JAP) from some bunker in New Zealand. Direct a guerilla war against these "elites" that will cost you your life. But no, I think I'll just sit here screaming about gay frogs all the while knowing that my "life's work" hasn't moved the needle one inch. Great, thanks for a few red pills here and there, but now you can be quiet, pay your billion dollar fine for being an idiot, and leave us in peace so we can enjoy the decline.
Exactly.Jones never talks about lizard people... you underscored the "Sandy Hook thing" as a key reason to doubt his judgment and you don't even know what he said on the matter or anything about the controversy? Sounds like you just want to complain and criticize someone who for all their flaws put their name on the line for multiple decades while you've done... what to move the needle?
Forgive me... But you're both factually wrong about many points here and at best Ignorant of what you're speaking about.I don't believe anything except that he somehow got his as* handed to him on the subject. How do you even get involved with a school massacre of children in a negative light? I'm not sure what he did/said as I didn't pay attention. But I saw it on TV which means whatever he did, it's real, and it's "something" (according to MSM he was either claiming it didn't happen or it was a false flag). Even if that something was just running his mouth at the wrong place, at the wrong time, on the wrong subject. Like I said, he ain't the sharpest tool in the shed. He of all people should know that there are forces of power larger than him out there that are not to be messed with. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen.
I know, he's a victim, he was framed, it was just bad luck. At some point there has to be logical consequences for one's actions and life choices. So you want to be a famous attention whoring millionaire who peddles supplements and "health" products while you sit there on your fat as* looking like you're about to keel over from a coronary? Well then, this is what you get.
And his whole Lizard People shtick is annoying too, show us proof, or shut up about idiotic stuff that can't be verified. When is the reservoir of attention and money filled? If you're serious, take your money, disappear, and work asymmetrically and anonymously underground to destroy the "elites" (who you won't name because you're a JQ denier who's married to a JAP) from some bunker in New Zealand. Direct a guerilla war against these "elites" that will cost you your life. But no, I think I'll just sit here screaming about gay frogs all the while knowing that my "life's work" hasn't moved the needle one inch. Great, thanks for a few red pills here and there, but now you can be quiet, pay your billion dollar fine for being an idiot, and leave us in peace so we can enjoy the decline.
I'm not the one claiming to be "doing" anything. Alex does all the claiming. So I don't know why you would come at me with the same old "what are you doing to change the world tough guy keyboard jockey" thing when I'm criticizing a celebrity whom I believe to be an "all about me," though well-intentioned grifter. Read my posts, I've given Alex plenty of props because he makes some great points, but ultimately I just see a man who is all talk with no meaningful action.Exactly.
Forgive me... But you're both factually wrong about many points here and at best Ignorant of what you're speaking about.
Not that you asked... But... Maybe inform yourself before making grand statements that discredit you're position....He covered some of the abnormalities on Sandy Hook (there were many things like people smiling one moment when no camera is on then crying, warning signs, ssri use ECT ECT ECT)... And never said it didn't happen. WE all did that with Uvalde too, and Las Vegas.
IF you actually knew what you were talking about...
You'd know that after Megan Kelly's hatchet job he went on to apologize many times and that he was never allowed to discuss what actually happened...rather issued summary judgements.
That whole thing was a media attempt to unplatform him and then that's the same method they used with Trump.
You're mixing Jones up with David Icke in the lizard people and giving yourself a mental purple nurple.
Your last sentence of the first paragraph is very obtuse. He's still participating and fighting in spite of bankruptcy... What are you doing?