The Destruction of Modern Women

Blade Runner said:
I have to say it because I'm sure others are thinking it - good woman also not available as a wife. :cry:
Click to expand...
Unfortunately that is true. But monastics can have an effect on the world as well through their prayers. I pray she undertakes her calling with faith and sincerity, and prays for the other worldly young women out there who desperately need help. Sometimes a little push is all they need to change and embrace tradition, possibly making good future wives.

It is said when the monasteries are full, the jails are empty, the hospitals are empty, the casinos are empty... When the monasteries are empty, moral corruption pervades everywhere in society. As we saw in Russia 30 years ago. So in the grand scheme of things, more monastics can also bring more women to the Church.
 
analyst_green said:
Unfortunately that is true. But monastics can have an effect on the world as well through their prayers. I pray she undertakes her calling with faith and sincerity, and prays for the other worldly young women out there who desperately need help. Sometimes a little push is all they need to change and embrace tradition, possibly making good future wives.

It is said when the monasteries are full, the jails are empty, the hospitals are empty, the casinos are empty... When the monasteries are empty, moral corruption pervades everywhere in society. As we saw in Russia 30 years ago. So in the grand scheme of things, more monastics can also bring more women to the Church.
Click to expand...
As I've said in other places, this life is a paradox because it also doesn't mean as much as we think it does. I think that's proven in the way that the world goes through some pretty horrible stuff and seemingly really absurd phases - yet God deemed the bigger picture as the goal (eternal things). It's a pretty mysterious thing, no doubt. The biggest test for men in the modern day of constant distraction, ads, internet, etc is the sex issue and testosterone. As a quick summary, that's what this site is all about (rightly directing energies, and mostly that is sexual, thus finding a wife, etc). That brings up the larger paradox of modernity: women are all about sex appeal, but very infrequently about being honest about the practicality of male desire. It's closer to using sex as a means to get things, then not actually having very much sex - hypergamy, sexless marriages, etc.
 
This one really, really gets the not so lil piggies mad:



"But my fishing rod has a weight limit"

tv land lol GIF by nobodies.


And they always respond along the lines of "yours must be small" (liked by 2 million land whales).

The obligatory response

4936816756.jpeg

Shocked Cat GIF
 
A friend pointed out the other day that if you look historically, there has always been a decently high number of women who didn't get married and have kids. I think this is the way it should be, since economically and civilizationally it means more if men don't contribute via hard work and with families. Also, since women only have short windows, it makes even more sense this is the case. The saddest part is that a HUGE number of subpar women can get married with a decent man these days and LESS (the ones who would be locked out before) choose it, even with all the advantages in the world.
 
Blade Runner said:
A friend pointed out the other day that if you look historically, there has always been a decently high number of women who didn't get married and have kids.
Click to expand...
Well I remember reading that over the whole course of history something like 2/3 of women had offspring whereas only 1/3 of men had offspring. This would be consistent with hypergamy that top tier males are fornicating with multiple women while bottom tier males are not reproducing.
 
Just wanted to poke my mug into this thread to say something about hoe_math on Youtube. I think he's a good ambassador of redpill information, better than all of the PUAs of the past, simply because he's not trying to help men be promiscuous, but he's very good at explaining the situation and clearly wants to try to help prevent the collapse of civilization. I always thought redpillers were making a huge mistake in trying to get men to be promiscuous instead of helping average men improve themselves enough to land and keep average women. hoe_math is the first person who really gets it from a perspective of trying to help society.

I guess right now we are on track to see if society can prevent itself from collapse and barbarity when the majority of men have no play whatsoever.
 
Australia Sucks said:
Well I remember reading that over the whole course of history something like 2/3 of women had offspring whereas only 1/3 of men had offspring. This would be consistent with hypergamy that top tier males are fornicating with multiple women while bottom tier males are not reproducing.
Click to expand...
Yes, my point also was to make others aware that at least a good number of women just worked for most of their lives and nothing happened. Population booms, it turns out, have way worse implications on the subsequent generations, since the relative abundance makes women less and less possible to deal with.

thinkreadwritecode said:
I guess right now we are on track to see if society can prevent itself from collapse and barbarity when the majority of men have no play whatsoever.
Click to expand...
We don't, but it's just going to be a different flavor. There are actual escape and entertainment mechanisms now that make it at least possible to divert the attention of 50% of men who are not paid attention to and/or are checked out. I think the bigger part of the "collapse" is just a standard of living issue, which is actually why one of the only solutions (won't happen) would be a massive die off and wealth transfer to younger generations. It's horrible to say, but if we also lost another 20-30% of the injected it would also dramatically help - but not if taxes remained confiscatory or DC still maintained as much power. I'm not rooting for any scenario because a) it doesn't matter what I think or want and b) the only real option is to leave the authoritarian, debased status quo for another land with better treatment of productive people.
 
thinkreadwritecode said:
Just wanted to poke my mug into this thread to say something about hoe_math on Youtube. I think he's a good ambassador of redpill information, better than all of the PUAs of the past, simply because he's not trying to help men be promiscuous, but he's very good at explaining the situation and clearly wants to try to help prevent the collapse of civilization. I always thought redpillers were making a huge mistake in trying to get men to be promiscuous instead of helping average men improve themselves enough to land and keep average women. hoe_math is the first person who really gets it from a perspective of trying to help society.

I guess right now we are on track to see if society can prevent itself from collapse and barbarity when the majority of men have no play whatsoever.
Click to expand...
He is religious in some of his posts, but not the majority.

He is quite against promiscuity as it leads to the destruction of society, not to mention morals.
 
Blade Runner said:
I saw a hoe math vid that showed a video of a (South) Korean girl appealing to some feminist movement there and laughing at how they might go extinct, which is just beyond bizarre, considering that before it got anywhere close to that level, women would cease to have any power and/or N Korea takes over, which is effectively the same thing. One of the weirdest things about women, and we see this in modern women, is the complete inability to think that times or things could be any different ...
Click to expand...
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
Women use cats as substitutes for kids, who would’ve known.

Click to expand...

It's true. The level of hormonal changes that women go through when they are pregnant is off the charts. They think, say, and do things that they never would have before pregnancy, and they'll deny they were ever different. Tip to young newlywed men: put a baby in her ASAP and keep doing it. Give her 3 kids, 5 kids. It'll keep her focused, feminine, faithful, and busy, so the crazy feminist indoctrination is less likely to kick in.
 
Australia Sucks said:
How many men can afford to raise 3 - 5 kids at a good standard of living?
Click to expand...
This is the question. I was listening to two guys bicker about the "system", and mainly inflation and debasement of the currency, as the reason why "young people won't get married". They were going back and forth between a lower class guy with many kids and apparently no job, and some relative who was younger that had a gf but didn't want to start a family because of the "cost".

The point of one of the debaters was that you can have kids, you just decide that your standard of living will suffer majorly, so you don't do it (wealthier kid raised well, let's say vs third world immigrant type). He was correct. The other guy got hot and bothered by that, and responded, well, you want to have kids with a proper framework, and not just have kids to have them. I think the answer is between these, but they of course miss the most important point of all: the guys "need" all this money due to women and their expectations, and what they will or will not do if you marry them and things don't fit some model they have in their dreamy heads or souls. These idiot boomers still can't call it out for what it is. If the women were young and wanted to get married young and support a man and have kids, they would do it. They don't. Period.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top