Where in the Bible is race mentioned? I don’t think it is at all. The dictionary definition of racism is simply “discrimination”, which can range from job hiring, immigration policies, to mate selection.in Christianity racism is simply when you deny someone the possibility of being a Neighbor because they are a different race from you.
For example, if you walk by someone bleeding out on the side of the road, but refuse to help them because they are black or brown, then that is racist in the true sense of the term. You've developed hatred for another race even though they are creatures of God.
Race was not always known as "race" but rather generations hence the modern word "genes" and genetics. The Scriptures has hundreds of mentions of the generations of biblical figures, aka their race, or more appropriately, undiluted lineage. The Bible specifically instructed Adam's lineage, and the commands and references were more numerous after the covenant was established between God and Abraham's son Israel and not Esau, of maintaining a strict pureblooded descent. There were two primary reasons for this, one was for Christ to be traceable on his human ancestry all the way back to Adam, so he literally is the "Son of God" and the purest "Son of Man" at the same time, and the second was to ensure that the spiritual and blood integrity of God's people was not eroded by intermingling with aliens, because other than dysgenics, the primary adoption in intermarriages were "other gods" and "other practices" malignant to worshipping one God. See the Kangz thread for specific mentions, I don't want to put it all in this thread:Where in the Bible is race mentioned? I don’t think it is at all. The dictionary definition of racism is simply “discrimination”, which can range from job hiring, immigration policies, to mate selection.
Where in the Bible is race mentioned? I don’t think it is at all. The dictionary definition of racism is simply “discrimination”, which can range from job hiring, immigration policies, to mate selection.
[people of common descent] 1560s, "people descended from a common ancestor, class of persons allied by common ancestry," from French race, earlier razza "race, breed, lineage, family" (16c.), possibly from Italian razza, which is of unknown origin (cognate with Spanish raza, Portuguese raça). Etymologists say it has no connection with Latin radix "root," though they admit this might have influenced the "tribe, nation" sense, and race was a 15c. form of radix in Middle English (via Old French räiz, räis). Klein suggests the words derive from Arabic ra's "head, beginning, origin" (compare Hebrew rosh).
Yes but what your describing is different. That's called an O1 visa. Totally different than the H1B.Personally I would like to see the H1B visa program removed wholesale but that is not going to happen. Failing that they could bring in a new requirement that only those receiving a $200,000 per annum salary or higher can be hired on the visa. That way only people with actual in demand skills will be hired and it will cut down significantly on fraud and abuse (using the program to import cheap foreign labour).
Personally I would like to see the H1B visa program removed wholesale but that is not going to happen. Failing that they could bring in a new requirement that only those receiving a $200,000 per annum salary or higher can be hired on the visa. That way only people with actual in demand skills will be hired and it will cut down significantly on fraud and abuse (using the program to import cheap foreign labour).
The below pretty much summarizes the state off affairs and this being A Net Win.
Big shout out to the MAGA crowd on Twitter with credible
Yes but what your describing is different. That's called an O1 visa. Totally different than the H1B.
O1 is supposed to be for Nobel prize winners or world renowned scholars or artists (e.g, rock stars). This gets gamed though (Indians paying scam journals to write articles for them so they appear to be scholars).
For H1B, I’d like to see none, but if we keep it (sounds like we will) I’d set hard caps, forbid employment agencies from participating (Indian scam shops), and H1Bs granted on the highest salaries offered. This would help mitigate H1B being gamed to undercut salaries. I’d also have country caps so it’s not dominated by Indians.
We are also suffering from the consequences of massive immigration in Australia.They have the same shit in Australia?
Because they were never needed, it is just used as slave labor to destroy the middle class and enrich the satanic elites, and the middle class is already dead in the water. Why would we do more of the same thing that caused the middle class to collapse? This USA was a far superior place to live and raise a family before that fraud Elon stepped foot in this country.I have a rather logical thought...
And it's a question really...
There is a lot of H1B abuse. That needs to be gutted. Completely.
There is also a lot of H1B holders that have added excellent value to the USA. Elon included.
Why can't both things be true at once?
Why can't we reform and address the abuse and encourage the valuable immigration by stronger vetting?
Isn't this common sense?
Or do we want to replace one DEI system with another DEI system?
The below pretty much summarizes the state off affairs and this being A Net Win.
Big shout out to the MAGA crowd on Twitter with credible voices that Elon couldn't just ban like Posobiec.
ETA the 711 post ...
Yes but what your describing is different. That's called an O1 visa. Totally different than the H1B.
First you're wrong. Elon was not an H1b. He was in a student visa.I have a rather logical thought...
And it's a question really...
There is a lot of H1B abuse. That needs to be gutted. Completely.
There is also a lot of H1B holders that have added excellent value to the USA. Elon included.
Why can't both things be true at once?
Why can't we reform and address the abuse and encourage the valuable immigration by stronger vetting?
Isn't this common sense?
Or do we want to replace one DEI system with another DEI system?
I have a rather logical thought...
And it's a question really...
There is a lot of H1B abuse. That needs to be gutted. Completely.
There is also a lot of H1B holders that have added excellent value to the USA. Elon included.
Why can't both things be true at once?
Why can't we reform and address the abuse and encourage the valuable immigration by stronger vetting?
Isn't this common sense?
Or do we want to replace one DEI system with another DEI system?
I have a rather logical thought...
And it's a question really...
There is a lot of H1B abuse. That needs to be gutted. Completely.
There is also a lot of H1B holders that have added excellent value to the USA. Elon included.
Why can't both things be true at once?
Why can't we reform and address the abuse and encourage the valuable immigration by stronger vetting?
Isn't this common sense?
Or do we want to replace one DEI system with another DEI system?
O-1s are also abused. They are also given for extraordinary ability in athletics, art, motion pictures, etc. They are gamed 100%.
I have a rather logical thought...
And it's a question really...
There is a lot of H1B abuse. That needs to be gutted. Completely.
There is also a lot of H1B holders that have added excellent value to the USA. Elon included.
Why can't both things be true at once?
Why can't we reform and address the abuse and encourage the valuable immigration by stronger vetting?
Isn't this common sense?
Or do we want to replace one DEI system with another DEI system?
Just out of interest, are foreign NBA players and NCAA athletes also on 0-1s?