Trump doesn't want to debate her too soon while Dems can still change their minds. Trump wants them to be stuck with Kamala, and then force them to carry the albatross into election day. If Trump destroys her now they will just switch again.
2024 Election Lounge
- Thread starter Thomas More
- Start date
Trump doesn't want to debate her too soon while Dems can still change their minds. Trump wants them to be stuck with Kamala, and then force them to carry the albatross into election day. If Trump destroys her now they will just switch again.
Thank God the SCOTUS ruled in a Godly way on Roe v Wade. May God forgive anyone who opposed it.
Any lashback by the baby killers is enemy action. We certainly shouldn't wish we had cowered before the enemy in hopes they would have had mercy on us.
May God bring them to a knowledge of the truth.
That is good and fine, if you are ready to go fight. Otherwise, you will just continue to lose elections and lose to the left for eternity. I agree with you and I hope more God fearing men are ready to fight, but until we do, we will just lose election after election, whether lose the results or lose by the GOP moving further and further to the left.
As of 2024, Harris' Office of Vice President (OVP) has about a 92% staff turnover ratio.
Below article is from 2021...
A former Kamala Harris staffer says aides have to endure 'a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism': report
A former Kamala Harris staffer says aides have to endure 'a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism': report
A staffer who worked for Harris before she became vice president told The Washington Post that aides were "constantly sort of propping up a bully."
www.businessinsider.com
Now three years later...
VP Kamala Harris Had 92-Percent Staff Turnover During Her First Three Years
VP Kamala Harris Had 92-Percent Staff Turnover During Her First Three Years
Chaos reigns on the vice president’s staff. And Harris tried to hide it by claiming that her office is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
openthebooks.substack.com
Edit.
Every presidential election year, each candidate gets a short term boost in the polls after their party's convention. In this case, it's happening for Kameltoe. However, they have a historically lousy candidate. The Dems have to psych themselves up under the circumstances.
This wave is not a permanent thing that will carry through to the elections. The Dems are going to have buyer's remorse in the worse way before the election.
No one listens to Richard Spencer with any credibility.
What has be been right about of magnitude?
While it needed to be overturned, there's no doubt in my mind that them overturning it when they did was a strategic move to stop the red wave. As far as it's actual effect on abortion, things have only gotten worse since then. Abortion needs to be legislated against at the federal level, death penalty.
"Leave it up to the states" is a candy ass answer but it's the most you're gonna get from the GOP. Which is fine, if they would stop gatekeeping the actual pro-life movements.
Last edited:
It's the best we'll get in this lifetime. Can't understand those who want to ban abortion at the federal level, it would trigger a massive backlash that would result permanent abortive access nationwide.
Why? She isn’t a drug addict trying to sell secrets to China and Ukraine?
That’s a commercial put out by the Harris campaign? Honestly they would do better to have her husband and stepdaughter talk instead of Kamala. Edit, that’s not Kamala’s daughter
We've already had nigh-permanent abortion access nationwide. Time to legislate some morality. Now if only we had the politicians who had the guts to pull it off. It's not that they're dumb, they're very smart at screwing you over and gaming the system. They just don't have the guts.
Hunter, filthy degenerate that he is, is at least memeable in a fun way. Kamala's step daughter isn't.
And how legalising morality has worked out so far ?
Not being ironic. I'm genuinely curious - abortion used to be banned all across the western world, but now there's only a handful of countries left, that restrict it. So I don't think that a ban alone would work, not in a godless society. You bring back God first, and then the laws will follow.
Last edited:
I learned more about life in general, including politics, religion, behavior patterns, etc, etc, from his old podcast with Edward Dutton and Keith Woods.
Basically, everything taking place now they predicted 6 years ago.
All legislation is based on morality. The only question is which morality. If the government is not willing to enforce the law, then whatever is illegal on paper already becomes legal in practice. So bans are nothing without enforcement. On any number of issues, you can already see this being played out.
On paper, illegal immigration breaks the law de jure. But the corrupt government is not willing to enforce the law, so illegal immigration remains the de facto law of the land.
Abortion can be banned on paper, but if the government is not willing to enforce the law, then people will keep getting them unabated.
The difference between the right and the left is that the left is willing to enforce their own laws. They will not only make "counter-semitic" speech illegal on paper, they will follow through and actually enforce that law.
Whenever the right actually dares to enforce the law, World Wars get started over it.
The abortion issue is not just for Christians to virtue signal, it's a perfect example of why the right will keep losing to the left. Politically, it is in your best interest to not give up that fight.
Overturning Roe was the first step. Now that abortion isn't a legal right in all 50 states the battle will be to change hearts and minds in blue states.
I wouldn't be against a federal ban imposed by Congress but I don't know how it would work with almost half the country opposed to it.
(While they are at it, they should ban pornography too.)
I wouldn't be against a federal ban imposed by Congress but I don't know how it would work with almost half the country opposed to it.
(While they are at it, they should ban pornography too.)
Last edited:
But haven't we been there already ? I'm thinking Ireland - they had an abortion ban and they were enforcing it, but with the society abandoning God and becoming secular, anti-life movements began to grow and once co-opted by the mainstream (media, political parties, culture, etc.) they were able to overthrow the ban. Without seciety returning to God, we're just going to replay the Irish scenario.
Mostly old news, still an excellent video about the state of things
Tulsi warns us at 19 minutes 10 seconds of what a Kamala presidency would be
Tulsi warns us at 19 minutes 10 seconds of what a Kamala presidency would be
Everything that is necessary to ban abortion at the federal level is already baked into the Constitution. If the Supreme Court were an impartial judiciary, rather than a political activist group, abortion never would've gotten off the ground. The left can never be persuaded to vote against their own sinful desires, so a just government is necessary to suppress the left. Right now, that's already happening, but the shoe is on the other foot. You will never be persuaded to give up your freedom of religion, speech, right to carry, but the left is already enforcing their own morality on you, so that you cannot do those things.
The right is always intimidated into giving an inch to the left, but when you give them an inch, they take a mile. Which is why I do not advocate in ceding any ground to the left. If you are not willing to enforce your law on them, they will enforce their law on you.
John Adams once said that the Constitution was written for a moral and Christian people, unfit for any other. It only gets truer by the day. Freedom is only fit for people who are willing to use their freedom for good. When the people have become corrupted to use their freedom for evil, then that freedom is not a freedom worth keeping.