Last edited:
2024 Election Lounge
- Thread starter Thomas More
- Start date
Edit.
My Fellow Black Men—It's Time to Get in Line Behind Kamala Harris | Opinion
We are not voting for Vice President Harris because she is a Black woman. We are voting for our own interests and those of our families.
www.newsweek.com
Last edited:
I believe the numbers for soycialist Minnesota, but bs on Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Those Michigan numbers are a joke.
The cucks at Fox just make this stuff up. They're as bad as CNN and MSNBC at this point.
The cucks at Fox just make this stuff up. They're as bad as CNN and MSNBC at this point.
They're conducting polls with crazy dem percentage bias.
Think about that, let's say they interview 100 people and 46 are Republicans and 54 percent are Democrats of course it's going to skew. But even so, it's not going to pan out that way come November.
Oh they probably interviewed 100 Fox News employees and focused on never trumpers
I wish I posted in the politics section more often but the low value posting I've seen from the likes of members like Magoo, PurpleUrkel, Johnnyvee etc is excruciating to get through. There are likely more but I haven't browsed through enough lately.
Also, if I speak my mind, many times it's been some ad hominem attack on me due to religion etc. To be fair, it's not just me that gets attacked personally. I see posts from low value members asking others to "be a man" etc. Really amateur level stuff.
It's not like I don't enjoy the "Heritage" members' posts. Even with disagreements, I got along with them in the old and new forum. It's just extremely difficult to have an intelligent conversation going in the politics section without the personal attacks and rants from the low value members.
I'm honestly even shocked they haven't been banned yet. I'm not compelling anyone or requesting the moderators to do so, but maybe you can consider these thoughts as you continue that moderation.
Overall, there is so much I want to share about on the ground politics and perspectives, but when I come here and read some of this stuff, I get that feeling that it's not my kind of space any more. Hopefully that will change.
Also, if I speak my mind, many times it's been some ad hominem attack on me due to religion etc. To be fair, it's not just me that gets attacked personally. I see posts from low value members asking others to "be a man" etc. Really amateur level stuff.
It's not like I don't enjoy the "Heritage" members' posts. Even with disagreements, I got along with them in the old and new forum. It's just extremely difficult to have an intelligent conversation going in the politics section without the personal attacks and rants from the low value members.
I'm honestly even shocked they haven't been banned yet. I'm not compelling anyone or requesting the moderators to do so, but maybe you can consider these thoughts as you continue that moderation.
Overall, there is so much I want to share about on the ground politics and perspectives, but when I come here and read some of this stuff, I get that feeling that it's not my kind of space any more. Hopefully that will change.
At a gathering yesterday with some late-boomer types (age range 60-62). Somebody mentioned Kamala and the women unanimously hoped she would win. Their main objection to a Trump win is that he would take away abortion rights. Comments about how middle america is dumb and religious (ergo, dumb), how they wish certain people's (politicians, SCJs) daughters would get raped so they would discover what it was like to not have access to abortion, and so on. And of course, "Trump will start WWIII".
After bringing up a few salient points about Harris, I get the usual "they're all corrupt, both equally bad" etc.
I don't recall who said it, but it was really brought home to me: "when you argue with a boomer, you're basically arguing with the television."
After bringing up a few salient points about Harris, I get the usual "they're all corrupt, both equally bad" etc.
I don't recall who said it, but it was really brought home to me: "when you argue with a boomer, you're basically arguing with the television."
I don't post that much in US politics, but I believe that the quality, direction and the future of this forum depends on the content provided by each and every one of us. Nothing will change, if You just remain waiting on the sidelines.
I hate the generational labeling crap but it's 100% true, even "conservatives" all just spew whatever the tv tells them. Especially women, I had a discussion recently with a Christian conservative older women who swore up and down that the J6 protestors were armed and trying to kill all the politicians. I told her to find the article where she read that and she did, it was a very carefully worded hypothetical fantasy veiled as news from a major publication saying "if" they were armed which fooled her and she wanted to change the subject after that saying "maybe you're just more conservative than me".
...to which you replied, "I'm pretty certain I am."
Yup. Liberals will harp on and on about Trump's alley cat morals, but when you point out that their guy is a devil worshipper, you get these moral equivalency platitudes. Well, where was that moral equivalence before? They are liars top to bottom.
This is pretty much what I’d expect out of the modern woman. I don’t think this election, or any election in the past two decades or so, is really hard to figure out and I think a lot of guys over complicate the analysis.
Most women will still vote for Kamala because she’s a woman and some sort of non-white. They can feel safe in their pick because the social consensus manufactured by the media they consume will make them feel that way, they will still get to have their abortions, and they can be full of pride that they voted for the non white male candidate. Kamala will also get a good majority of any other nonwhites, save maybe Asians, who don’t really make a difference. The fact that she’s an obnoxious woman may deter some of them from voting for her, but I doubt many would switch to Trump.
Trump has the boomers, who will all die soon, and then some fringe minorities and perhaps the right wing dissidents (who also don’t really make a difference). People will have long forgotten about the whole ear shooting thing by November.
I guess it could go either way, who knows in this unstable and irrational world. I don’t think Kamala is as repulsive to most women as a lot of people in the GOP mindset think, because many (if not most) of the women in this country are equally as repulsive. That’s just reality. No debate or information is going to change that. Brown people and baby-killing women are going to vote for the brown woman hyena candidate. White men and maybe some of their wives will vote for the WWE Smackdown candidate. Just look at the demographics and run the numbers.
You may be completely right. However, I was under the impression that all women hate each other. That said, probably they would vote for an unlikeable Harris over Trump.
MSM is fully backing Harris as one can see the cover of New York magazine:
In this issue: System Reboot
The complete table of contents for the July 29, 2024 issues of New York Magazine.
nymag.com
The fact that abortion is this important to people shows how degenerate our society is becoming. I'm against abortion to spite them just as much as the religion aspect.
The one that was most adamant is childless herself, go figure.