Even better that way. If it was just an EO, then sooner or later another democratic president would overturn it with his own order. But once it goes all the way up to SCOTUS, we will have a constitutional ruling, binding all future administrations.
US Border Crisis
- Thread starter Let God Arise
- Start date
-
- Tags
- immigration
I agree, but we don’t know how they will rule. There is precedent that they will rule striking it down. I think the evidence is stronger for them to vote to strike down the EO, than to end birthright citizenship. It’s a dumb rule, but we’ll have to see how his DOJ argues.
Last edited:
I'm somewhat hopeful. At the very least SCOTUS should close some loopholes, like the birth tourism, for good.
Intent of 14th amendment quite clear. Not, any beaner who shows up and spits out a baby, but “Subject to the jurisdiction therein”. How can judges not see what was written in the Congressional record by the author of the 14A and see clearly what was intended?
Reminder: author of the 14th amendment in 1866, on Congressional record:
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States. ”
It was never intended to create anchor babies.
It has always been unconstitutional.
Reminder: author of the 14th amendment in 1866, on Congressional record:
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States. ”
It was never intended to create anchor babies.
It has always been unconstitutional.
Caduceus
Heritage
To cut back on government spending costs, those 18,000 Indians will all be sent back to India with only ONE airplane.
Caduceus
Heritage
^ I sense a new hit Fox Nation weekly show coming. The theme song is, of course, ICE ICE BABY by Vanilla Ice.
It’s time to stop letting courts determine the destiny of a country and its people. That is not up to them to decide, and a serious leader would utilize the means at his disposal to make it very clear to any judge who would think otherwise that those matters are simply “not within their jurisdiction,” so to speak.
Crossing your fingers and hoping some court of kangaroos will rule in your favor is not a way to lead a country. Anyone who would lay down and just accept a decision telling Americans who they are (and therefore by definition who they aren’t) isn’t fit to lead. Merely because some court issues their definition of your people on a piece of paper does not make it so, even if the ruling is in your favor.
Doubt this will happen, but it is necessary.
The breathless drama queen shtick from the media is so utterly tiresome. It's exhausting to even listen to them for 2 minutes.
I tend to agree, but what is the alternative? Our system of government is based upon checks and balances, though the constant lawfare is certainly tiresome and an abuse in my opinion.
This is the thanks some people get. I’m cool with the immigrants that assimilate and work hard to become proud Americans. Especially if they get real jobs and aren’t on state / gov support, but instead what I’ve seen in practice is many of these types just form communities of their own and avoid assimilating.
When you talk to them, they claim how much better their home country is so it’s clear there are here to plunder and take advantage of economic opportunity or worse attempt to kill the people that help them like this man.
Most of these unvetted immigrants/refugees here today don't give an iota about becoming American; they are here for the paved roads, 5G WIFI, and central HVAC.