US Border Crisis

TruckDriver9 said:



Maenwhile in the sanctuary city of Boston:
Click to expand...


Excellent start. The Haitian guy is a tool, don’t let the door hit you on the way out. I’m laughing at people who support this garbage, yeah let’s just let people with 18 prior convictions out in the community. What a joke.

The Trump admin also has to target the NGOs, and other groups that funnel and protect these people. In addition the prosecuting the politicians of sanctuary cities. Cut off the funding now and start lining them up.
 
WaveMechanic said:
I tend to agree, but what is the alternative? Our system of government is based upon checks and balances, though the constant lawfare is certainly tiresome and an abuse in my opinion.
Click to expand...
There are no checks and balances. Rather, it is a shell game. It must be recognized that this concept of “rule of law” isn’t in force in this country in present day and cannot exist in a borderless country (which is an oxymoron but applies to America) with infinite racial, religious, and political factions. I’m not proposing an alternative government. What I’m proposing is a leader with conviction and the balls to stand up to a Judas court, as opposed to this “oh well checks and balances” charade that we all know doesn’t exist. This is not unprecedented in our history, and a savvy executive could make it happen if he positions his pieces accordingly.
 
El Dorado said:
Doesn't tell us much, unfortunately.
Click to expand...
It does. Immigration lawyer is formerly undocumented himself who is helping illegal immigrants in America.


Molina Flynn made history as the first openly gay and formerly undocumented person to serve as a judge in Central Falls.

Originally from Colombia, he arrived in the United States at age 9 on a visitor's visa, which he overstayed, becoming undocumented.

After moving to Central Falls and later settling in Pawtucket, he faced challenges, including a language barrier in school. Despite these obstacles, Molina Flynn excelled academically, graduating summa cum laude with a B.S. in accounting from Johnson & Wales University and earning a Juris Doctor from the University of Michigan Law School.
Click to expand...
www.newsweek.com

Who is Joseph Molina Flynn? FBI raids immigration attorney's office

The office of immigration attorney Joseph Molina Flynn in Rhode Island was raided by the FBI on Thursday.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
budoslavic said:
It does. Immigration lawyer is undocumented himself and is in America illegally.

www.newsweek.com

Who is Joseph Molina Flynn? FBI raids immigration attorney's office

The office of immigration attorney Joseph Molina Flynn in Rhode Island was raided by the FBI on Thursday.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
Click to expand...

From the article:

“…made history as the first openly gay and formerly undocumented person to serve as a judge in Central Falls.”

“Originally from Colombia, he arrived in the United States at age 9 on a visitor's visa, which he overstayed, becoming undocumented.”

“…he faced challenges, including a language barrier in school…(he) excelled academically, graduating summa cum laude with a B.S. in accounting from Johnson & Wales University and earning a Juris Doctor.”

So here you have a gay illegal alien who was running a law practice and serving as a judge. He apparently was a genius who graduated summa cum laude despite not knowing the language. Yeah right, or was it more likely his teachers gave him great grades because of DEI.

You better bet he was helping 1000s of illegals cheat the system like he did.

What a scam. This is the system we’ve set up with DEI and illegal immigration, they are given the resources and help to succeed above native born Americans.
 
The Penitent Man said:
There are no checks and balances. Rather, it is a shell game. It must be recognized that this concept of “rule of law” isn’t in force in this country in present day and cannot exist in a borderless country (which is an oxymoron but applies to America) with infinite racial, religious, and political factions. I’m not proposing an alternative government. What I’m proposing is a leader with conviction and the balls to stand up to a Judas court, as opposed to this “oh well checks and balances” charade that we all know doesn’t exist. This is not unprecedented in our history, and a savvy executive could make it happen if he positions his pieces accordingly.
Click to expand...
That might be very well what the Antichrist (whoever he may be) ends up doing.
 
budoslavic said:
It does. Immigration lawyer is undocumented himself and is in America illegally.

www.newsweek.com

Who is Joseph Molina Flynn? FBI raids immigration attorney's office

The office of immigration attorney Joseph Molina Flynn in Rhode Island was raided by the FBI on Thursday.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
Click to expand...

I never realized how big of an industry that is. Recently i was in a big multi-office building and walked right past an immigration law firm - i was blown away at all the loopholes and legal situations they advertise help with (of course all written in spanish and other foreign languages), all posted on a huge banner outside their door.

Its just so blatant that the system is being abused, and that we the (mostly white) tax payers are footing the bill for all of it, and suffering the cumulative results. I have no illusions about how bad our situation really is, but just seeing everything laid out on a lawyers office door took my anger to a new depth.
 
Dusty said:
Click to expand...

maxresdefault-1024x576.jpg


Separated at birth?
 
The Penitent Man said:
So what’s the President of the United States going to do about it? Will this man of action summon his team of brilliant lawyers to present his case in front of the Honorable Ketanji Brown Jackson and her colleagues on behalf of the American people? Lol.
Click to expand...
Did you read the article? It's a temporary restraining order for two weeks.

Edit.





 
Last edited:
Josephus said:
You better bet he was helping 1000s of illegals cheat the system like he did.

What a scam. This is the system we’ve set up with DEI and illegal immigration, they are given the resources and help to succeed above native born Americans.
Click to expand...
It's commonly accepted knowledge that hiring the "right" immigration attorney is a huge benefit to the immigrant. The system is so rigged nowadays, I can't help but wonder if there are certain friends of the court that are too friendly to the court. I wouldn't be surprised if the system is loaded with kickbacks and benefits for people making such decisions. Raiding an attorney's office is a big deal. Especially for a corrupt FBI that has been licking liberal boots for years. Serious policy change here.
 



Trump is of course right about birthright citizenship, and here's why.

The Fourteenth Amendment begins, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The key phrase to consider there when considering who is a "natural-born citizen" is "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The argument of Trump's legal supporters is that illegal immigrants are subject to a foreign sovereignty, are therefore not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and thus the citizenship clause above does not apply.

The "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause, effectively ignored by birthright citizenship advocates, has to have some meaning or it wouldn't have been included, and the number of children of foreign diplomats being vanishingly small, we can assume it extended beyond that extremely rare case (so rare as hardly to be worth mentioning).

What was meant by the clause was that you had to be subject to no other sovereign.

Senator Jacob Howard drafted the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Here is what he said it meant: "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons." (Emphasis added.)

Well, if we value honesty, that right there should settle it.

Congressman John Bingham, sometimes called the father of the Fourteenth Amendment itself, held that its meaning was that "every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen." (Emphasis added.)

Beyond this evidence, two Ivy League professors, Peter Schuck and Rogers Smith, in Citizenship Without Consent: Illegal Aliens in the American Polity, published by Yale University Press, make a compelling case that the Fourteenth Amendment does not mandate birthright citizenship.

The two scholars begin a Summer 2018 article in National Affairs this way:

If an unauthorized alien gives birth to a child on American soil, is the child automatically a United States citizen? Americans have long assumed that the answer is yes — that the child is a birthright citizen regardless of the parent's legal status, and that such citizenship is required and guaranteed by the Constitution. But a closer examination of the matter suggests that this answer is actually incorrect, and that birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants here illegally is better understood as a matter for Congress and the American people to resolve.

What makes their conclusion especially interesting is that Schuck and Smith describe themselves as scholars who "strongly favor even more legal immigration than the U.S. now accepts, and a generous amnesty for those now here illegally."

So even though their conclusion runs counter to their personal political beliefs, and they are not Trump sympathizers in the least, they contend that the evidence is so strong against birthright citizenship that scholarly honesty compels them to say so: "The fact that many opponents of birthright citizenship for the children of unauthorized parents harbor anti-immigrant views does not mean that their bottom-line position is wrong."

They argue that because the Constitution does not mandate birthright citizenship, the matter may be regulated by congressional statute instead.

There was no "illegal immigration" problem at the time the Fourteenth Amendment was drafted, so (even though we have the testimony of Jacob Howard, which would seem to settle the matter), Schuck and Smith suggest using the example of Native Americans to shed light on the issue:

The framers vested such discretion [regarding the citizenship question] in Congress with respect to Native Americans, whose presence in the country (which of course long predated that of the framers themselves) was manifestly accepted. This was recognized in the 14th Amendment's own text, a long line of treaties with the tribes, and legislation regulating their citizenship. We doubt the framers would have denied Congress that same policy choice with respect to a group whose very presence in the country — by definition — violates federal law. Basic constitutional protections for this group would certainly have been granted, as in Plyler. But automatic citizenship without public debate and congressional consent would probably not have been. [Emphasis added.]

This is one very good reason that history matters. Not so much because we can always draw neat little "lessons" from it, but because if we have a deep knowledge of history we will be better equipped to respond to shysters trying to pull one over on us.
Click to expand...

Edit.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top