Edit.
Last edited:
The U.S. Catholic Church feels it has to speak out on President Trump's immigration policies, "which we see as going against some of the basic tenants of our faith, frankly — the fundamental right of every human person that need to be respected, no matter their origin, no matter their situation," says Bishop Mark Seitz, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' committee on migration. Seitz also says Pope Francis "certainly is paying attention" to the administration's actions.
California Immigration Attorney is having clients pulled over by Border Patrol
She lists the locations ICE and Border Patrol are catching her clients
- Hunnington Beach
- “We also received phone calls from clients in Utah saying that CBP was in Walmart looking for people”
- Calls came in from Van Nuys saying that Customs and Border Patrol were there
- Sightings were from Home Depot and McDonald's in Van Nuys
She then proceeds to educate illegal migrants on how to avoid being detained by border patrol and ICE
This is criminal, they’re breaking the law. She should have her law licensed pulled for trying to aid criminal illegals
Did you read the article? It's a temporary restraining order for two weeks.
Edit.
It's commonly accepted knowledge that hiring the "right" immigration attorney is a huge benefit to the immigrant. The system is so rigged nowadays, I can't help but wonder if there are certain friends of the court that are too friendly to the court. I wouldn't be surprised if the system is loaded with kickbacks and benefits for people making such decisions. Raiding an attorney's office is a big deal. Especially for a corrupt FBI that has been licking liberal boots for years. Serious policy change here.
No I didn’t. I don’t have time to sift through every article someone posts.
This doesn’t really change the issue, that all or most of these EOs are likely going to be challenged through the deeply corrupted US judiciary and Trump will likely lose on most of these fronts.
This is because the judiciary has long-since bestowed upon itself the power to “say what the law is” (and everyone just let that slide) and the judges in the key systems are either leftists or John Roberts style, milquetoast pushovers.
If anything, the Supreme Court will deny cert or otherwise kick the can to Congress if they don’t want to take heat on any issues they think the public supports but they want to rule against, or vice versa. So the question remains: when that happens, will this president just lie down and roll over?
We already know the answer to that, because we’ve been through four years of this already, which resulted in Biden. These executive orders are Trump attempting to clean up a mess he should have taken care of in his first term. Day 1 had some nice symbolic gestures, but let’s be realistic here. There isn’t a political solution to the problems that face us. If the president actually wants to effectuate a positive, and permanent change, he should understand and be prepared for that. Anything else is just for show.
From a Little Birdie on Trump winning the birthright citizenship battle at the Supreme Court (where this will ultimately go):
"The best argument is that a president has power to end birthright citizenship if its an invasion. Whoever on Trump's team that crafted his EO appears to be following an opinion from Federal Judge Jim Ho making that case (or what we call in my legal circles "The Ho Invasion Theory"). I'm not sure even Clarence Thomas agrees yet with ending birthright citizenship whole cloth. But I do think more judges would be willing to sign on to ending it under the guise of a president stopping an invasion as opposed to a governor like when Texas tried this. Because presidents have wide constitutional latitude when it comes to matters of national defense, and these illegal aliens are causing enough harm to be treated as enemy combatants. Or at the very least this level of invasion has the potential to. And most agree that so-called birthright citizenship does not apply to enemy combatants."
I would bet they will be. We’re not even a week in. I maintain cautious optimism but regardless, it’s just a Band-Aid on an evisceration wound. The EO game has been played out for a good while now, and any of these can be wiped out in an election cycle.They won’t. They are worded much better this time to face legal scrutiny. The only one that is being challenged so far is the birthright citizenship one.
You mean they support the three-fifths clause and only men having voting rights? What does being an “originalist” even mean in 2025? If the entire Bill of Rights was repealed by legitimate constitutional means, an originalist would uphold that and enforce it. Same with any other insane amendments made.Not really. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch, are near pure originalists.
“Our system” doesn’t work for me. It’s their system, and has been for a while. Frankly, I don’t care what kind of system we have, just as long as it is not immoral, supports me, my family, and my nation. I’m not here to defend a system that doesn’t defend me. Whatever system you think you’re defending or are trying to save is long dead. That system has been mutilated beyond recognition and doesn’t serve you, but works against you. My forebears recognized when the system which governed them was no longer beneficial to them and they threw it off and started anew. The modern system is the design and under the control of those who wish me harm, I’m not going to defend it.Then you are looking for a dictator, not a president. That’s not how our system works. Again how were his EOs symbolic? Which ones besides the birthright one are being stopped?
“The United States Air Force is going to supply four aircraft to remove up to 5,000 aliens … We made this happen in a matter of three days. They’re a welcome force multiplier for us … especially on removal flights.”
Yeah at this rate they won't even be making a dent. How many tens of millions are here illegally?Let’s do the math.
Biden let in an estimated 20 million illegals* during his term.
Trump’s term of 4 years equals 1,460 days.
20,000,000 illegals / 1,460 days = Trump would have to deport 13,700 illegal each and every day of his term JUST TO GET TO 2020 BASELINE, when there were already another 20-50 million illegals to deport.
What you’re starting to see in the media regarding ICE deportations is a goyslop media narrative for suckers.
———
*Per an MSM “fact check”:
"During a Sept. 13 campaign rally in Las Vegas, Nevada, former President Donald Trump claimed 21 million people have been let into the U.S. under incumbent President Joe Biden’s administration.
Verdict: Misleading"
For a "misleading" verdict by a so-called "fact check" globohomo organization means it's probably double that in actuality, to be honest:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...r-the-biden-harris-administration/ar-AA1qMiXH
Yeah at this rate they won't even be making a dent. How many tens of millions are here illegally?
They're going to need a LOT more agents, and resources. They also need to get people to self deport. Cut off gibs. Prosecute employers. prosecute and dismantle NGOs. Go after politicians who are protecting them.
This is a start, but they're going to have do more, way more.
Bingo.Let’s do the math.
Biden let in an estimated 20 million illegals* during his term.
Trump’s term of 4 years equals 1,460 days.
20,000,000 illegals / 1,460 days = Trump would have to deport 13,700 illegal each and every day of his term JUST TO GET TO 2020 BASELINE, when there were already another 20-50 million illegals to deport.
What you’re starting to see in the media regarding ICE deportations is a goyslop media narrative for suckers.
———
*Per an MSM “fact check”:
"During a Sept. 13 campaign rally in Las Vegas, Nevada, former President Donald Trump claimed 21 million people have been let into the U.S. under incumbent President Joe Biden’s administration.
Verdict: Misleading"
For a "misleading" verdict by a so-called "fact check" globohomo organization means it's probably double that in actuality, to be honest:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...r-the-biden-harris-administration/ar-AA1qMiXH
I was discussing this with somebody the other day. I got to thinking about the USN's amphibious assault ships like the Tarawa and Wasp classes. (I think @Get2choppaaa deployed on USS Wasp) From what I've read, those ships can carry around 1,700 Marines, not including the actual crew. If there are any older hulls which are decommissioned yet still afloat, I wonder if it would be possible to gut them of their military hardware and refit them as floating detention facilities, kind of like the old floating 'prison hulks' from the Age of Sail. Far more secure, with less chance of escape than some camp with just chain-link fencing and barbed wire.Big concentration camps for The Deported to be used as holding, internment, and staging areas like they had in WW2.
If there are any older hulls which are decommissioned yet still afloat, I wonder if it would be possible to gut them of their military hardware and refit them as floating detention facilities, kind of like the old floating 'prison hulks' from the Age of Sail. Far more secure, with less chance of escape than some camp with just chain-link fencing and barbed wire.