The Hot-Holy Matrix

Yeah but I am not talking about single mums or 40 year old roasties. I am talking about prime aged single women (without children). Most women in the church are either married, single mums or 30+ years old. Next time you go to church ask some of the single young men how it is for them to try and meet a woman at the church and see what they say.
I dont know hey there were men and woman of all ages at church and there are also a ton a children and babies, these children in a decade are going to be 18 and 20 year olds and even right now there are men and woman of all ages in the church, I know there are many guys that complain about the lack of dating opportunities in church but I havent seen it myself in the churches that I have attended.
 
even right now there are men and woman of all ages in the church,
Not saying there aren’t any young women in the church but the ratio matters a lot. If there is only one young single woman for every 10 single men then 9 of those men will have to look outside the church for a wife. Maybe you don’t care because you are already married and it doesn’t affect you,
 
I agree. The issue that makes your point more of a technicality is that most of the west is dead on arrival. That is, few are even good looking beyond the good behavior and other parts. So if you can't even get close to #1 (sexual attraction and youth), you're not going anywhere. We can't deny that we are men and that is just basic biology. Again, jobs, diplomas, too many words, etc don't give me a boner and I can't have sex with them, either.

How important is that though? Isn't that just a desire to satisfy lust?

After a while even the hottest girl would get boring. If she has some potential as a mother and is ugly or even older I'd say that's ok.
 
That Is keyboard warrior talk. Come back and let us know when you have married an ugly older woman. Easy to suggest another man should do it but not so easy to stomach yourself.
It's actually the opposite of keyboard warrior talk. I'm suggesting a practical solution. Keyboard warrior talk is non stop gesticulating about finding an ideal bride in a foreign country.
 
It's actually the opposite of keyboard warrior talk. I'm suggesting a practical solution. Keyboard warrior talk is non stop gesticulating about finding an ideal bride in a foreign country.
Nobody wants to marry an ugly older woman that’s why it’s keyboard warrior talk. Finding a bride in a foreign country is a practical solution. Have you not seen the millions of western men who are married to imported brides? Or the exist men in Thailand, Vietnam etc married to local women?
 
Nobody wants to marry an ugly older woman that’s why it’s keyboard warrior talk. Finding a bride in a foreign country is a practical solution. Have you not seen the millions of western men who are married to imported brides? Or the exist men in Thailand, Vietnam etc married to local women?
Many of these are either lust covenants or modern secular codependent type relationships.

I think the key is deciding are we looking for a holy union here? Of a woman with strong moral character who is also God fearing or has potential to be so?

Or are we just looking for a decent looking woman who 'isn't that bad' in regards to looks/morality/mental illness even if she isn't Christian.

If you want the latter then yeah, go to Asia. It certainly is probably not as bad (if your concerns are looks and her attitudes towards ideology) but comes with a host of problems as well.

I guess my question is, what's your criteria?
 
How important is that though? Isn't that just a desire to satisfy lust?
I think we've been through this Tippy. It's very dependent on the person. I don't think it's debatable that the initial attraction to the opposite sex, especially for a man, is sexual and thus dependent on youth and beauty. The answer to question to is to satisfy boner test for children, and make the relatioship suitable and worthwhile. Why would you presume that it's "lust"? If men thought that fucking ugly women or women who had interesting things to say (like men) was OK, sustainable or even doable we'd have a quasi utopia in terms of always having kids and families. Be real now.
If she has some potential as a mother and is ugly or even older I'd say that's ok.
Like he said, easy to say this kind of nonsense when no one knows if you have skin in the game. I called Roosh out for this kind of stuff near the end. You can talk about all the high falutin' ideals all you want, but until I see you marrying the hambest, stfu
That Is keyboard warrior talk. Come back and let us know when you have married an ugly older woman. Easy to suggest another man should do it but not so easy to stomach yourself.
yup.
 
If I recall "satisfying the boner" test as used by Roosh basically meant the woman hits your baseline for attractiveness. It doesn't mean she is necessarily hot or under 22 years old. If a man's bare baseline is that she is at least an 8 and 20 years old and you are holding for that no matter what while passing up someone who is 30 years old and a 6 I think that man has to accept the most likely chance is that he will end up with nothing barring going abroad.
 
Not saying there aren’t any young women in the church but the ratio matters a lot. If there is only one young single woman for every 10 single men then 9 of those men will have to look outside the church for a wife. Maybe you don’t care because you are already married and it doesn’t affect you,
Lots of people are converting all the time its just a matter of time, if you are faithful and attend church Im sure God will send someone your way dont worry
 
I think we've been through this Tippy. It's very dependent on the person. I don't think it's debatable that the initial attraction to the opposite sex, especially for a man, is sexual and thus dependent on youth and beauty. The answer to question to is to satisfy boner test for children, and make the relatioship suitable and worthwhile. Why would you presume that it's "lust"? If men thought that fucking ugly women or women who had interesting things to say (like men) was OK, sustainable or even doable we'd have a quasi utopia in terms of always having kids and families. Be real now.

Like he said, easy to say this kind of nonsense when no one knows if you have skin in the game. I called Roosh out for this kind of stuff near the end. You can talk about all the high falutin' ideals all you want, but until I see you marrying the hambest, stfu

yup.
But the thing raising children does not have a lot to do with the boner test at all. The boner test is just lust. Raising a family you should be thinking of other priorities. And skin in the game? So what. I just think you have to ask yourself if you took away lust what would be important and go for that. But often it seems to be 'nah - just want a hot devout girl so I guess I'm going to Russia.' But then no one actually goes to Russia. So what are we even doing? And then I get called the keyboard warrior. Ha.
 
If I recall "satisfying the boner" test as used by Roosh basically meant the woman hits your baseline for attractiveness. It doesn't mean she is necessarily hot or under 22 years old. If a man's bare baseline is that she is at least an 8 and 20 years old and you are holding for that no matter what while passing up someone who is 30 years old and a 6 I think that man has to accept the most likely chance is that he will end up with nothing barring going abroad.
But since a marriage is supposed to be permanent you have to factor in degradation of looks.

If a woman is 30 years old and a 6 that means in 10 years time she will likely be 40 years old and a 5. Do you really want to be married to a 40 year old woman who is a 5/10?

Whereas if a woman is 20 years old and a 8 out of 10 in ten years time she could be 30 years old and a 7/10 if she looks after herself.

You need to get enough years of her being attractive for it to be a worthwhile ROI considering you have look after her for the rest of your life!

And yes as I have said many times already going abroad is the only realistic solution. You aren’t going to marry a 20 year old 8/10 in the west barring a miracle.
 
But the thing raising children does not have a lot to do with the boner test at all. The boner test is just lust. Raising a family you should be thinking of other priorities. And skin in the game? So what. I just think you have to ask yourself if you took away lust what would be important and go for that. But often it seems to be 'nah - just want a hot devout girl so I guess I'm going to Russia.' But then no one actually goes to Russia. So what are we even doing? And then I get called the keyboard warrior. Ha.
Back in the day traditionally if an accomplished man married an ugly woman because she was a good wife and mother he would have affairs on the side with younger more attractive women and the wife would turn a blind eye to it. But now that is no longer seen as acceptable for men to have affairs so their is now less incentive for men to marry older ugly women.
 
Lots of people are converting all the time its just a matter of time, if you are faithful and attend church Im sure God will send someone your way dont worry
The problem is that the culture is just too much to overcome, but somewhat it is on me in the sense that I have a view of what is commensurate or suitable for me given my profile. The "available" in the west and my country (USA) are all old from a historical point of view, which is mine, and have been for some time. Anyone younger is already out of the game and the other generations, even those nearing 30, are some of the worst ever spawned. A 28 year old woman now was 16 when smartphone use was peak and climbing in terms of degeneracy and social media.
 
But since a marriage is supposed to be permanent you have to factor in degradation of looks.

If a woman is 30 years old and a 6 that means in 10 years time she will likely be 40 years old and a 5. Do you really want to be married to a 40 year old woman who is a 5/10?

Whereas if a woman is 20 years old and a 8 out of 10 in ten years time she could be 30 years old and a 7/10 if she looks after herself.

You need to get enough years of her being attractive for it to be a worthwhile ROI considering you have look after her for the rest of your life!

I made a point before that a reason why a woman merely being a 8+ or more isn't a good reason for entering a marriage is indeed because of the degradation of looks. Even if you do manage to marry her young (which is a huge if) you're going to get at the most a decade of her at her peak. After that 10 years will be an entire lifetime of her being not being a 8.

Let's even if she takes really care of herself and is a 7/10 through her 30s or stretching it, even into her early 40s. Even in that ideal scenario (which most likely will not happen) she's still only half way through her life and in the final half of her life she's going to be a 5 or below.

If you you don't enjoy being around women outside of the physical rise she can get out of you, I think this is a pretty bad deal (and remember I'm assuming you get the best deal possible in terms of looks in terms of the way she preserves it) and that marriage for these men would be a negative and it's better off for them to remain unmarried. And yes, I am considering the negatives of being unmarried as well. I actually think remaining unmarried would actually be less of a negative for a lot of the guys on this forum who are super focused on wife hunting.

Based on what I've seen them write on how they feel about women and their attitudes about marriage, I actually think they would be miserable even if they got their unicorn. I'm guessing even before their wives looks fade, they would already be miserable having her around constantly since they appear to find female nature to be mostly irritating and aggravating. No amount of looks would be able to overcome this past the honeymoon phase.
 
Back in the day traditionally if an accomplished man married an ugly woman because she was a good wife and mother he would have affairs on the side with younger more attractive women and the wife would turn a blind eye to it. But now that is no longer seen as acceptable for men to have affairs so their is now less incentive for men to marry older ugly women.

Funny GIF


On a different note, you do realize that a woman's level of attractiveness depends on how you feel about her?

That's literally the hiccup with prostitution for a lot of men. It doesn't matter how she looks, it makes you feel like a loser doing it.

Not saying you should marry some butterface but why create unnecessary problems for yourself. If she doesn't disgust you then she's worth talking to, if she makes you feel good then she'll become attractive from the dopamine hits.
 
Back in the day traditionally if an accomplished man married an ugly woman because she was a good wife and mother he would have affairs on the side with younger more attractive women and the wife would turn a blind eye to it. But now that is no longer seen as acceptable for men to have affairs so their is now less incentive for men to marry older ugly women.

Dude, do you ever get out of the house?

@FrancisK just spelt it out for me underneath this post

Your obsession with the perfect virgin girl will make your life tick away as it's pretty much impossible to find a wife like that these days.

Also; those virgins lie too...
 
Last edited:
But since a marriage is supposed to be permanent you have to factor in degradation of looks.

If a woman is 30 years old and a 6 that means in 10 years time she will likely be 40 years old and a 5. Do you really want to be married to a 40 year old woman who is a 5/10?

Whereas if a woman is 20 years old and a 8 out of 10 in ten years time she could be 30 years old and a 7/10 if she looks after herself.

You need to get enough years of her being attractive for it to be a worthwhile ROI considering you have look after her for the rest of your life!

And yes as I have said many times already going abroad is the only realistic solution. You aren’t going to marry a 20 year old 8/10 in the west barring a miracle.

Go through your high school yearbook and look up all the attractive teenage girls now, the vast majority of them look completely busted today and many of the girls you didn't even bat an eye at look beautiful now compared to the others. A woman who has kept her looks into her 30's has a better chance of maintaining them long term vs a random 20 year old.....she's already proven it.

If you just prefer young girls then so be it I'm not saying this to justify marrying an older woman I just don't think your line of thought applies to a justification of your preference.
 
Back
Top