The DEI Thread

DEI overload.







GgOwqzEWMAAyauj
 
University Of Iowa To Cut Social Justice Classes As Student Interest Declines


One day in the near future people will look back on this era as the moment that America snatched common sense back from the jaws of unmitigated insanity. Get Woke, Go Broke is becoming a cleansing wind as thousands of companies across the US abandon DEI and social justice programs in an effort to avoid total financial collapse. That said, the last organizations you probably expected to see dumping their woke initiatives are colleges and universities. After all, these "institutions of higher learning" have been ground zero for the woke mind virus for decades.

Surprisingly, even universities are now accepting the reality that social justice is a dead ideology walking. The University of Iowa is following this trend after recently announced that it will be shutting down two social justice related departments and it will eliminate its social justice major as part of an effort to streamline and restructure some humanities offerings.



Under the proposed plan, the college would close the departments of American Studies and Gender, Women’s, and Sexuality Studies, as well as the current majors in American Studies and in Social Justice, which have fewer than 60 students combined. Administrators will centralize their remaining programs into one program, ostensibly due to lack of interest.

The decision comes as Iowa passes a ban on DEI in public schools. It is one of six states so far to do so, though it is unclear how much this applies to colleges and social justice related curriculum. So far, it looks as if the University of Iowa is getting ahead of the coming changes. Of course, progressive activists and leftist faculty of the school are not happy about this development.



Numerous colleges have been quickly dropping DEI policies and programs in an effort to avoid public backlash (and lawsuits). For example, the University of Michigan is rolling back multiple DEI initiatives including the practice of legally precarious "Diversity Statements" for anyone applying for a faculty position. The statements, which require a declaration from potential hires on how they will maintain DEI, are solicited from university employers on a case-by-case basis. (Michigan does not have a university-wide policy, but they do not admonish the practice either.)

Diversity statements are used when weighing candidates for hiring, promotion or tenure, and represent a declaration of political fealty. Those who refuse to provide a statement are unlikely to get a job or a promotion.

Michigan’s DEI programs have come under scrutiny after a Times investigation found that the university had spent a quarter of a billion dollars since 2016 on DEI efforts, 56% of which went to salaries and benefits for DEI staff. But Black student enrollment, for instance, has hovered near 5% for nearly a decade (it’s currently at 6.1%).

Michigan’s regents have since publicly stated that they plan to reassess DEI efforts, including budgetary commitment. The eight-person regents board, made up of mostly Democrats, makes decisions on the university’s finances and policies.

This kind of policy upheaval in academia was thought impossible only a couple years ago. A landslide of anti-woke sentiment among the wider public has accelerated the shift way from what many consider to be a political refuge for zealots, degenerates and the mentally ill. Though there is still much work to be done, the woke movement continues to die a well deserved death.
 

New Orleans Police Superintendent says she had no clue that New Orleans had sidewalk barriers to defend against terror attacks, which are now being used today.

What a total embarrassment.

Reporters seemed shocked when Anne Kirkpatrick bizarrely admitted that she was unaware of sidewalk barriers, something that would have likely saved lives had they been installed on New Year's.

According to video footage, the New Orleans terror attack suspect appeared to get around police barricades by going on the sidewalk.
 
Here's two recent photos from BC, Canada. One's from McDonald's, the other from WalMart:

1736097265085.jpeg
1736097347711.jpeg
I just noticed these recently; I never remember seeing these type of signs back in the day before Canada's service industry was taken over by brown Temporary Foreign Workers.

Clearly, businesses such as these know that we resent these brown peoples' presence and simply don't care. They just rub our faces in it with the message: "If you have a problem with it, you're not welcome in our restaurant/store."

I specifically cite the references to inclusion and discrimination.

So us White, native born Canadians have to put up with rude/lazy/inept service from degenerate brown imports who hate us and often cannot speak English properly, but if we raise a stink about it, WE'RE the bad guys? Am I reading this right?
 
Last edited:
Here's two recent photos from BC, Canada. One's from McDonald's, the other from WalMart:

View attachment 16149
View attachment 16150
I just noticed these recently; I never remember seeing these type of signs back in the day before Canada's service industry was taken over by brown Temporary Foreign Workers.

Clearly, businesses such as these know that we resent these brown peoples' presence and simply don't care. They just rub our faces in it with the message: "If you have a problem with it, you're not welcome in our restaurant/store."

I specifically cite the references to inclusion and discrimination.

So us White, native born Canadians have to put up with rude/lazy/inept service from degenerate brown imports who hate us and often cannot speak English properly, but if we raise a stink about it, WE'RE the bad guys? Am I reading this right?
There may be some of this with employees acting badly and customers being expected to suck it up.

However, I think there is a legitimate issue of customers treating employees like dirt. I mean, these employees are only low paid poor people trying to do a job, and the customers think they can take out their frustrations with the corporation and with life in general on the person behind the counter. This sign is saying that won't fly. They'll be asked to leave without being served.

In many cases, it may be brown people who don't know how to behave decently that are the ones being asked to leave.

I see these signs in the states as well, but I support them.
 
Here's two recent photos from BC, Canada. One's from McDonald's, the other from WalMart:

View attachment 16149
View attachment 16150
I just noticed these recently; I never remember seeing these type of signs back in the day before Canada's service industry was taken over by brown Temporary Foreign Workers.

Clearly, businesses such as these know that we resent these brown peoples' presence and simply don't care. They just rub our faces in it with the message: "If you have a problem with it, you're not welcome in our restaurant/store."

I specifically cite the references to inclusion and discrimination.

So us White, native born Canadians have to put up with rude/lazy/inept service from degenerate brown imports who hate us and often cannot speak English properly, but if we raise a stink about it, WE'RE the bad guys? Am I reading this right?

Yeah, these signs may not be regarding bad behavior by Indian employees, but to stop general employee abuse.

Luckily for me my local McDonalds are staffed by Latinas.
 
Back
Top