Sports

In the past few weeks I've started to watch Serie A, the top football (soccer) league in Italy, on Paramount+. I enjoy watching the World Cup every four years, so I thought, why don't I bite the bullet and watch some games from one of the leagues, and I choose Italy because I'd like to learn Italian and live part-time in Italy someday (my mother is from Italy, I can get a passport).

I like a few things about football over American football: no commercials except at half-time, non-stop play, stoppage time, the game itself (played football in school, not American football), the physiques of the players (I prefer the lean athletic look of men over steroid monsters), the round-robin tournament. Essentially, every team plays for 10 months and the team that has accumulated the most points wins. The teams can also participate in knock-out tournaments while the regular season is on. I can see why football is a big deal in Europe, since it's almost always on and your team gets to play a lot more games than an American football team. I also got sick of blackouts, I'd prefer to watch a variety of teams play a sport where I'm not particularly interested in any one team.
 
I love American football. Being a wide receiver or free safety would be incredibly fun. I just wish the NFL wasn't so gay. College football is a little better but has its problems too.

Soccer, or football, is fun to play but boring to watch.
 
In the past few weeks I've started to watch Serie A, the top football (soccer) league in Italy, on Paramount+. I enjoy watching the World Cup every four years, so I thought, why don't I bite the bullet and watch some games from one of the leagues, and I choose Italy because I'd like to learn Italian and live part-time in Italy someday (my mother is from Italy, I can get a passport).

I like a few things about football over American football: no commercials except at half-time, non-stop play, stoppage time, the game itself (played football in school, not American football), the physiques of the players (I prefer the lean athletic look of men over steroid monsters), the round-robin tournament. Essentially, every team plays for 10 months and the team that has accumulated the most points wins. The teams can also participate in knock-out tournaments while the regular season is on. I can see why football is a big deal in Europe, since it's almost always on and your team gets to play a lot more games than an American football team. I also got sick of blackouts, I'd prefer to watch a variety of teams play a sport where I'm not particularly interested in any one team.
I grew up watching football. Lately I've been watching a lot of live ice hockey. It's a far better sport.

I no longer watch football because it seems like such a slow game compared.
 

WNBA Loses $40 Million Despite Woke Mass Marketing Campaign​


Every year feminist activists attempt to stir up a new controversy in order to fabricate public outrage and keep their agenda visible on social media. In 2024 one such controversy was the supposed pay disparity (which they call the "gender pay gap") between women's professional basketball and men's professional basketball.



The notion of the gender pay gap has been thoroughly debunked in the western world. The original theory was rooted solely on the average pay accrued by all men vs all women and was a statistical misrepresentation of reality. When those numbers are broken down, the fact is that men work longer hours, they work more difficult jobs, more skilled jobs, they take less vacation time and they don't have babies so they don't need paternity leave. All of these factors and more add up to a higher average salary for men vs women.

It has everything to do with women's choices and nothing to do with some nefarious patriarchal conspiracy to hold them back from success.

Because the overall gender pay gap argument has been destroyed and is no longer taken seriously, feminists then tried to search for specific examples of pay disparity in gender segregated professions. Professional sports is one of the few venues in which feminists could present a male vs female one-to-one comparison and say there is a distinct lack of fairness. Except, that argument assumes that male athletes and female athletes perform at the same level. The fact is, they do not.

Women's game performance and abilities are far behind those of their professional male counterparts. They are two separate universes in terms of entertainment. This is an issue which no one in the mainstream wants to address - The women's games are mostly terrible to watch.




Claims that the WNBA is "skyrocketing" in popularity are greatly exaggerated and the fact of the matter is the league has never been profitable. Recent reports indicate that the WNBA lost over $40 million this season and now investors are growing impatient.

“The WNBA owes the NBA so much we won’t see any windfall for years,” an NBA team executive told The New York Post.

The reality that undermines the pay gap theory for women's basketball is simple: The ladies don't sell enough tickets. Nor do they sell any merchandise, video games, jerseys, banners or much else for that matter. Their huge loss this year is concrete proof of that. The WNBA only exists because it is subsidized by the NBA and some private (and mostly male) investors; they take money from the male league in order to fund their games, and they have been losing that money consistently for over 25 years.

Comedian Bill Burr explains the insanity of the WNBA and feminism best:



The low sales argument once again debunked feminist claims of unfair salary practices. The WNBA makes no money; they lose money. So, the players should be happy they have jobs and get paid at all. But feminists weren't done yet - They then argued that the WNBA sells less tickets and and less merchandise, not because the women's game is mediocre, but because the WNBA "doesn't get the same level of promotion as the men."

They claim that if the WNBA was advertised at the same level, they would bring in the same kind of revenues as the NBA. Corporate partners with the WNBA then began pushing the league in a number of ads. Google took the lead in this endeavor in an effort to hype up women's basketball.



Obviously the campaign didn't work and marketing makes little difference. The only real drive of new interest in the WNBA has been Caitlin Clark, a draft pick that actually knows how to play and just happens to be white. This has led to drama, with other non-white players attacking Clark on and off the court out of jealousy. As Bill Burr notes, women prefer to tear each other down instead of building each other up, and that's one of the reasons why they fail in organized group endeavors.

The latest profit reports should lay to rest any future arguments from the woke crowd over pay for female athletes. They have no more excuses left. It's not the patriarchy, it's not lack of marketing, it's not lack of investment - It's lack of public interest in the WNBA on every level.
 
I'm watching Monday Night Football.

They just had a commercial where Mark Walberg walked into a church and prayed a strong prayer. It was for a project encouraging people to pray every day.

It was clearly Catholic. Not some vague new age pray every day. It was true Christian pray every day.

Very encouraging to see! God bless Mark Wahlberg and his ministry.

Edit: I thought I might be able to find the video from the commercial, but I couldn't. Turns out Mark Wahlberg has many videos about praying every day, so I couldn't find this specific one!
 
17307580907675667828818817212136.jpg


Micro Penis.

cracking up lol GIF by Chicks on the Right
 
Maybe it's because I'm getting older, but individual sports are so much more enjoyable than team sports. Wish I had focused more on things like running and swimming when growing up. The wrestlers always seemed pretty well rounded too.
 
No-one who has any real interest in boxing watched that last night.
This is true. I truly don't have any real interest in boxing, but I watched it!

I was hoping Tyson would win, being an old guy myself.

The fight was a bit of a snooze fest. Paul landed numerous light hits on Tyson, but could never connect hard. Tyson was somewhat dazed and weakened by the hits that Paul got in, and he was noticeably slower after the first two rounds.

However, Paul did not get the opportunity to take Tyson out. Tyson's defense was still good enough to prevent Paul getting in a block buster hit. Also, Paul seemed unwilling to get in close with Tyson, knowing that Tyson could still knock his block off if he got the chance to land a heavy punch.

All in all, Tyson's age made the result seem inevitable. However, I still think it was a realistic possibility for Tyson to get in a hard hit on Paul, and could have knocked him out.

On a related note, they had two women fight before the big event. They said these two women were exceptional, and the fight was one for the ages, but I was totally disgusted. I kept turning it off, and only checking to see when it was over so I didn't miss the Tyson fight.

The main reason these women's fights are on the ticket nowadays it DEI. However, it may be that women's fighting has more fan appeal than other sports like women's basketball, because sickos like watching women beat each other up. Not me!
 
Boxing is all about the money now. The Paul brothers have infested another aspect of life and have now made quite a sum of money from it.

The match was very obvious how it would end after 1 minute into the 1st round. Tyson is too old to do anything but stand in the ring and absorb blows hoping for an knockout opportunity.
 
Back
Top