Patriot Front (and other White Nationalist Groups)

Moderators should not be arguing with and subsequently banning other posters.
Although just getting started, this a great forum that deserves to exist. Starting it and moderating it must be a thankless job so I would suggest some patience and respect for the behind the scenes operators.

If you are referring directly to the two week ban of IIMT by Samseau then that's a tough judgment call. IIMT is obviously high IQ but he kept clogging up threads with repetitive long winded posts that seemed disrespectful towards almost everyone here. He was coming across with a condescending "know it all" complex (of which I too can be guilty of so "note to self" on that one). In addition, he was warned many, many times to ease up on the throttle and to not be so disparaging of modern day Christians and their respective churches.

All this being said, I hope IIMT doesn't take his ball and go home because he is providing value to CIK. If he does ghost us or come back with butt hurt rants then it will be further evidence that Samseau did the right thing.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps I missed your post about Napoleon: He was the result of popular dissent, not the cause of it. So I'm not sure what point you are making?
I have suggested many times that violence is a key component to any meaningful change (although I do not advocate for it nor would I participate in it because I'm living a "decent enough" American life) and that without Patriot Front picking up arms and getting their hands dirty they are a bunch of nobodies achieving nothing, to which you replied "This is just false. Nothing has ever worked this way." And then most recently in this thread you called for generating dissent and sparking a revolution. I'm guessing you were not talking about a non-violent revolution?

I was joking about the apology because now we are seemingly into some form of agreement with regards to the issue of physical resistance (i.e. violence).
 
Hello, "fellow Christian," have you ever seen a cross before?
Well, I wasn't being completely serious. I was trying to be lighthearted, since it looks like you have your work cut out for you in this thread already.

I was trying to point out that you called that "an example of the most effective political messaging in all history", simple symbolism the unwashed masses can understand in a one second glance.

Now, I like to think my IQ is somewhere slightly above retarded, and I think most would agree that "Christian Conservative" would be a fair way to describe my political stance, Yes, I have seen a cross before, and I know what it represents. But the Claw hammer thing and the X? No idea. The A and Omega? Those are the symbols for Amps and Ohms in my experience.

If you told me they were banners from a protest march with Elon Musk's Carpentry and Joinery company, and the Christian Electricians Union to signify their resistance against current trends, that would make sense (and be rather amusing) to me. Otherwise I genuinely don't know, and I don't believe most "average" people would either.
 
Well, I wasn't being completely serious. I was trying to be lighthearted, since it looks like you have your work cut out for you in this thread already.

I was trying to point out that you called that "an example of the most effective political messaging in all history", simple symbolism the unwashed masses can understand in a one second glance.

Now, I like to think my IQ is somewhere slightly above retarded, and I think most would agree that "Christian Conservative" would be a fair way to describe my political stance, Yes, I have seen a cross before, and I know what it represents. But the Claw hammer thing and the X? No idea. The A and Omega? Those are the symbols for Amps and Ohms in my experience.

If you told me they were banners from a protest march with Elon Musk's Carpentry and Joinery company, and the Christian Electricians Union to signify their resistance against current trends, that would make sense (and be rather amusing) to me. Otherwise I genuinely don't know, and I don't believe most "average" people would either.

Yes, yet you don't need to know any of that. You can find it out later. What catches the eye is the cross, so one knows it's ostensibly related to Christianity. It may spur one onward to look into what the rest of the symbols are for, why they are arranged like that.

As long as you can admit it's a cross, then the message worked. I'd also point out that the cross is not gaudy or loud either, it's a plain cross. You can be illiterate and understand it's a cross. You know it has something to do with Christianity. You may not understand anything else but you know it claims to be based on Christ.

That is already a huge deal, and conveys a ton of information. Now compare the Constantine Battle Standard with Patriot Front Flag: I have no idea what they are about even after looking at it for a minute straight. Nothing that anyone can relate to and immediately understand. Just some weird pagan imagery.
 
You realize I've explained why their efforts are counter-productive, and do exactly the opposite of what they try to achieve? Patriot Front's strategy is garbage.

1. Godless (so it alienates Christians, and exposes themselves to Satan)
2. Make themselves into useful boogey-men for Talmudic Jews to scare away women, children, and many rational thinking White men.

So, instead of generating popular dissent, Patriot Front does the opposite, making the sheeple think, "Well, my government is really bad, but at least they protect me from the big bad brown-pants Nazis!!"

Conversely, with mass movements that occurred under Trump and J6, the amount of people who supported J6 has increased over time, and has made the government look extremely illegitimate. The people at J6 were flying American Flags, and Crosses of Christ. It is no wonder they are succeeding whereas zero Pagan Neo-Nazi movements have never done anything to generate rebellion.

Supporting Neo-Nazi movements is the equivalent of quackery medicine but for politics. It looks like it is "doing something," yet in reality it makes your health worse. In this case, PF just makes the political situation worse, just like Richard Spencer lead men to their dooms with the "Unite the Right" nonsense, and giving easy talking points to the enemy.

The strategy is wrong, the approach is wrong, so the results will always be a failure.
I think you're forgetting that two contradictory things can be true at the same time. Patriot Front is not a solution because this type of thing has been tried many times before. Even if such an organization is successful in the future, it would be a fluke essentially. Being at the right place at the right time.

The only thing that matters is dissent. The more the merrier. Even if you don't agree with the politics of this particular organization, there should be countless such groups to join. J6 created a lot of dissent which is good but there's no one strategy that we should support.

So the way I look it at is "oh cool, more dissidents". Dissent is the only tool we have. The government is too powerful. There's too much trust in this "checks and balances" BS democracy promises.

Doesn't matter the political system, people should always behave as if they live in an autocracy and people should always show their disapproval by directly disobeying [yes, illegally] the government, if not that then by supporting those that do.

In the defense of PF, its not their fault everyone is retarded. Only problem I would have joining is the bar I have for a "white hero here to save the race” is pretty high. It would take a special leader to make me his “disciple” and I can take a guess the type of people that start these organizations.
 
I think this thread should be locked unless it continues to talk about Patriot Front updates and all of the theological and philosophical discussion merely surrounding factual and proven statements from Patriot Front, but all conversation about the benefits of the Church in tandem with the recognizing of each race's unique existence and fight for all of their survival's in parallel should be held at a different level of discourse. There is too much distraction in this thread.

There's no reason we should be dividing ourselves because of a group like Patriot Front, even if they do have the best interests for genetic European descendants in their hearts, at least in the USA.

Some of us have a hard time understanding a movement unless is is purely theological OR purely secular. Some can be both. Fascism, National Socialism, Francoism, and other similar forms of national-natalist and populist expressions are not inherently anti-theological. They are respective movements of the representative bodies of a population.

A few corrections from the last few pages of historical errors:

1. -There are no "pagan gods" represented anywhere by any of the symbols Patriot Front uses, the Fasces, the Hakenkreuz, or the Black Sun, or most older "White Nationalist" symbols. These symbols have been given a fictionalized background by the jews to create this boogeyman of White paganist nonsense and to mislead Whites about their origins. All of their symbology, while it does cross over with realms of secularity, have origins in the early years of Christianity. For the sake of relevancy to the expanded discussion of this thread, let's start with the Fasces:

The symbol is simple: it consists of a bundle of rods bound together around an ax, symbolizing strength through unity and the authority of the state. It was conceived in pre-Christian Rome, but was still used throughout the rest of its history, and even given a symbolic evolution under Christian Rome. The Fasces symbolized the authority of magistrates and officials, particularly those with imperium, or the right to command. It served as a visual representation of their power to enforce law and maintain order. Fasces were carried by lictors, attendants who accompanied magistrates and protected their authority. The number of rods in the bundle might vary with larger numbers symbolizing greater authority.

One example of the Fasces being used in combination with Christian symbology is found in the iconography of the Chi-Rho, an early Christian symbol representing the first two letters of the Greek word for Christ (ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ). In some Christian artwork from the late Roman and early Byzantine periods, the Chi-Rho symbol is depicted within a wreath or laurel, reminiscent of the rods bundled together in the fasces. This combination symbolizes the authority and victory of Christ over sin and death.

Another example is the use of the fasces in Christian iconography during the Byzantine Empire. In some depictions of Byzantine emperors or imperial regalia, the fasces appears alongside other symbols of authority, such as the orb and scepter. While these depictions primarily emphasize secular authority, the inclusion of the fasces in imperial imagery during the Byzantine period is relevant within the broader context of Christian rulership and the symbiotic relationship between Church and state.

Here is an explanation of Patriot Front's flag and main symbology: it is a circle with a Fasces in a center surrounded by 13 stars signifying the 13 colonies of the original United States. It is a neophyte design, but it is a valid historical reference and a call to arms and action for those who seek to correct the government of the social experiment we know as The United States of America. The founding fathers were deeply influenced by classical Greco-Roman philosophy, literature, and symbolism, and admired the republican ideals of ancient Rome, including concepts of civic virtue, citizenship, and the rule of law. In the visual iconography of the early American republic the Fasces appeared in various contexts as a symbol of republican government and ideals. It was featured on official seals, emblems, and architectural designs, serving as a visual representation of the unity and strength of the newly formed nation, and it also symbolized the collective sovereignty of the people and the authority vested in elected representatives to govern on behalf of the citizenry.

2 - The "secular revolution's always fail sentiment" is also false, unless you look at how long they last for. The American Revolution was basically secularist, given how much of the Founding Father's were not of the Apostolic or true Christian Churches (in fact none of them were), and it succeeded against a larger Christian element (the British). That lasted for 86 years until the Civil War broke out, which I consider the first part of the downfall of what America could have been.

I will admit that if Patriot Front continues to grow and its members neglect theological history, then yes, they will not get very far. The combination of their mission coinciding with the backing of the Apostolic Churches, who should rightly recognize all races created on earth deserve their own space to flourish and should not be forced to mix, would create a more just temporality in the USA, however this is problematic and unlikely unless certain variables change, as I will explain below. But first, a brief history:

3. -Italy did not invade Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia) in order to "race mix". This is not a historical fact. Italy clearly had grievances against the jewish-run British Empire and jewish-controlled masonic France's actions in the Mediterranean, especially due to their policies inflicted upon Italy after the Italo-Turkish war 1911-1912. They had already established colonies in Libya and Eritrea, where the natives were not put under suppression the way they were under the jews who pushed for complete domination in the British Empire's territories. As a matter of historical fact, Britain was in Abyssinia before Mussolini ever was. Abyssinia's location in the Horn of Africa made it strategically significant for British interests in the region. With every other one of the jewish-led British Empire's exploits, their presence in Abyssinia while not an official occupying Colonial power, was rife with economic exploitation, including unequal exchange, unfair labor practices, or the extraction of resources without adequate compensation. Mussolini put a stop to this, but the jew-loudspeaker newspapers at the time were broadcasting all kinds of lies just like they do today. Of course there was friction between the Abyssinians and the Italians, but any violence subsided after 1936. The Italians invested in infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges, railways, and telecommunication networks to facilitate transportation and communication within Abyssinia and connect it with other parts of the Italian Empire. While the Italian government did imposition Italian culture, language, and administration on the locals, it did not seek to interbreed with them out of the typical leftist colonial nightmare scenario.

Aside from localized friction between Roman Catholic missionaries and the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Mussolini was recognized as a rightful leader by a majority of the subjects under his state's rule. He was given the "Sword of Islam" by the Berber leader Iusuf Kerisc, a huge ornate blade signifying the people's trust in him.

1709606597770.webp

I have met his descendants. The man was a practicing Catholic who, albeit had a larger-than-life personality, never turned his back on the Church. and he was not a secularist, despite his creation of the Vatican state and the Lateran Treaty. His family is still Catholic and practicing to this day. Look at the following, and I will explain how it is rooted in Christian theology:

'Let man face and know his own soul, and our problem is solved. One man can do much. A group, spiritually united, can perform miracles.'
-Benito Mussolini

An average unlearned Christian reader would see no explicit mention of God or Christ in that quote and immediately shut down anything related to Fascism from being a solution. This sentiment from Benito exemplifies the Catholic teachings on the examination of conscience, repentance, and self-awareness in the context of one's relationship with God and others. The group statement is about building a just and compassionate society where individuals work together for the well-being of all. This collective unity would be grounded in principles of love, justice, and respect for human dignity. The last part about miracles is easily mistaken for a "secular" twist, but for those of you who also have been formally educated by the Church, what is a miracle? We know miracles as acts of divine intervention or grace that surpass human understanding. For Catholics, true miracles are manifestations of God's presence and power in the world, bringing healing, reconciliation, and transformation. All of the primary and secondary education in Italy during his youth and adolescence was rooted in Church dogma, so he no doubt received a majority of his philosophies from a religious background in his mentally formative years.

Seeking to reclaim the glory of the post-Christian Roman Empire for ethnic Italians was and still is a noble goal, if it were to continue along these lines. There can be arguments made for both sides of the Italo-Abyssinian conflict, but to simply reduce it to "evil fascists invading Orthodox Ethiopia" is a chiding emotional statement. There is always more to it than simple smear statements like this. Back to the present:

4- Who Trump represents versus who Trump is, this is a huge issue and the reason why it doesn't accomplish anything is because it doesn't align. The people who support Trump don't know that he doesn't care about them. The millions of White Americans interests for their posterity is nowhere on his radar. He simply seeks to kowtow to the gradual intravenous replacement of Whites as opposed to the liberal "gimme all your darkies now" method. He wants to make life better for Blacks, Mexicans, Asiatics, and H1B pajeets, which, at the rate they breed, will be at the expense of the heritage American European descendants. The obvious plants like Richard Spencer can be seen by anyone with a cursory study of history over the last 100 years.

5- The authority of the Churches in America and in Europe at this point in time are misunderstood by both sides of the argument. To the benefit of those who are proponents of the Church, myself included, the Churches, both Catholic and Orthodox are in no position to dictate immigration governates to the nations they reside. Only perhaps in Russia, Armenia, and Georgia do they have political sway and perhaps only in Georgia do they keep it Georgian. It is not the Church's business to establish immigration and emigration quotas nor to honor ones set forth by a secular government (in the case of the USA, UK, and western European nations). However, I don't see the conflict getting to a point now where there is open discourse between major religious leaders and White Nationalist groups unless someone helps to bridge that gap, so none of us can really say what will happen this time around when that does occur. The main issue is that this is a relatively recent phenomena, mostly post-WW2 to be exact, as we are delineating underneath the jewish definition of "White" and not along the natural European / Mediterranean racial distinction that is clearly apart from African, Indian, Aztec, Semitic Arabian, and Asiatic.

6 - I think a huge issue between both sides of the last 8 pages is also that of action vs inaction. It is a lie that only White Nationalist groups seek action, many Christians also seek action, both justifiably violently against the satanic communist hordes and politically against their prostitute enablers in office. The Churches cannot take an official stance on this at the moment because there is poor leadership in many of them, and they are already greatly reduced in their influence, if they were all preaching what the clergy in Yugoslavia (mainly Croatia), Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary were preaching to their blessed anti-communist soldiers and commando units of the 1930s and 1940s, this would indeed escalate a hot war because many more people would fight if their Church was encouraging it.

7 - The sentiment that Tsar Nicholas II was destroyed and Russia was scourged by the Marxist jews either wholly or in part because he went to war against the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Kaiser's Reich in WWI is also unfounded. Yes, it was a strategic mistake, but it was not what cost Tsarism its expiration. The jewish devils were scheming since Napoleon's downfall to overthrow the Tsar, and they tried to ignite the revolution several times prior to 1917 but the social and demographic conditions were not ripe for their success. There is no gauge in history that proves only true Christian leaders succeed, while those who "were obviously not Christian or not Christian enough" failed. This is a logical fallacy. If this were the case there would be no martyrs, and very few saints.

Let's not let this thread make us bitter and resent one another, and let us continue the search for truth in all matters, past, present, with a perspective on the future.
 
I think this thread should be locked
Disagree. There's plenty of good stuff in this thread even if it's a bit "off topic." There's no shortage of server storage for a scant 24 pages so let it ride. It's going to be what it's going to be. Trying to control/moderate every minutia of a conversation is a fools errand.

There's no reason we should be dividing ourselves because of a group like Patriot Front
Apparently there's plenty of reason(s). Division can be good, not much would get done in this world without stress and disagreement.

Let's start with the Fasces: The symbol is simple: it consists of a bundle of rods bound together around an ax, symbolizing strength through unity and the authority of the state.
The authority of the state? Doesn't this lend itself to the theory that Patriot Front are a bunch of non-serious play-acting feds running around unarmed in Hitler-esque khakis "peacefully" chanting stupid sh*t in an attempt to protest the authority of the state?
 
There's a guy I found on Gab who finds various trash and litter and writes dissident philosophy on them.

I saw this one and thought of this thread.

View attachment 5820

Yet another ignorant whose never heard of the Orthodox Church.

Tell me, why isn't Russia a total puppet of Zionism?

1708700630900616-jpg.5485


This meme sums up the thinking of most "White Nationalists". Their ignorance on their own race's history is simply shameful.
 
Ah yes the classic two-pronged attack.

>Christianity is cucked!!

(points out the ancient apostolic church that is not cucked)

>No one's in that church anyway!! Doesn't count!!

So maybe the messaging shouldn't be that Christianity is cucked, but that we need to get onboard with the church that isn't cucked and defend it.
 
There's a guy I found on Gab who finds various trash and litter and writes dissident philosophy on them.

I saw this one and thought of this thread.

View attachment 5820
Granted, many American Christian churches have been subverted to embrace zionism, however I find the growing number of channels accusing Christianity of being a "cuck" religion, disingenuous. I feel that pushing western men to embrace some form of militiant neo-paganism is yet another form of subversion.
 
Ah yes the classic two-pronged attack.

>Christianity is cucked!!

(points out the ancient apostolic church that is not cucked)

>No one's in that church anyway!! Doesn't count!!

So maybe the messaging shouldn't be that Christianity is cucked, but that we need to get onboard with the church that isn't cucked and defend it.
You are not wrong.

Most people are not going to go into Orthodoxy any time soon, though. And that, too, is a true statement.

What's the easier problem to solve? Convince the masses to join the Orthodox church, or influence change in the church you go to with your friends, family, and community?

For all of the "spread the good news" that I've seen people preach in my life, I've never seen anyone in my real life talk about how Orthodoxy is the way. I've seen anti-abortion protests, and Mormons walking neighborhoods, and even non-denominational Christians attempt to convert Muslims. But I've never in my life seen Orthodox Christians reach out to others in real life. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I'm saying I've never seen it.
 
You are not wrong.

Most people are not going to go into Orthodoxy any time soon, though. And that, too, is a true statement.

What's the easier problem to solve? Convince the masses to join the Orthodox church, or influence change in the church you go to with your friends, family, and community?

For all of the "spread the good news" that I've seen people preach in my life, I've never seen anyone in my real life talk about how Orthodoxy is the way. I've seen anti-abortion protests, and Mormons walking neighborhoods, and even non-denominational Christians attempt to convert Muslims. But I've never in my life seen Orthodox Christians reach out to others in real life. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I'm saying I've never seen it.

I'm all in favor of decucking efforts in existing churches, in some cases however it is indeed hopeless and I want to stress that the solution is not to abandon Christianity but to find it and defend it. Orthodox are bound to be hardliners on the true Church but I know how hard it is to reshape entire communities (though I know mass conversions of entire parishes have happened multiple times in American history). I just want to defend against the assertion you shared that real Christianity is long gone, it's not the case. And the true and righteous path is not going to be the easiest one. But your point that Orthodox are not as strong at evangelization is a fair one and a topic of frequent discussion amongst Orthodox. Nonetheless as I've mentioned before my parish is growing at an astounding rate (~15% growth this year I'd estimate) and I know it's not the only one.
 
The authority of the state? Doesn't this lend itself to the theory that Patriot Front are a bunch of non-serious play-acting feds running around unarmed in Hitler-esque khakis "peacefully" chanting stupid sh*t in an attempt to protest the authority of the state?
If the state is authoritarian because it's people are plundered by outside predators and foreign aliens, and it will not allow this to occur, then it is necessary, and beyond a fair exchange to protect its ethnic citizenry. This is why democracy is so easily undermined. The early Romans had to invest a solid trust in their expansion of the European Hellenic concept of the state because they were dealing with a hinterland of wild tribes everywhere. I've seen savage uncivilized violence, as have most of us or most of us will in the coming days, and having a proper state that isn't corrupted by anarcho-tyranny and jewish nepotism to deal out the Anglo-Saxon concept of justice will be a blessing.

You are right that it is a theory, but it is a theory that doesn't hold water. I don't think everything PF is doing is strategically successful, but this is the "early years" similar to 1919-1920 of the Weimar Republic where groups like this begin to foment. Maybe it won't be PF that will lead to a successful dissolution of the corrupted USA government, maybe it will be another that is more clever, more sound, and more connected to the Churches which enables them to reach larger audiences and show them the truth of what is happening to them and what will happen to their children if this beast is left unchecked.

That's an awfully big g there.
Just in case you didn't see my explanation, there is absolutely no evidence that they are doing charity in the name of any "god," but plenty of evidence they are acting in the sense of the Christian mores given to us by the one True God. Kind after kind, helping a brother in need, and protecting those who are persecuted. Very similar to what those in the early years experienced, even if it is not for spreading the Gospel directly.

As a matter of fact no charity has ever been done for any pagan deity. These concepts of entities all self-serving and demand sacrifice or tribute or undue worship, typical of something not from The Lord. To be charitable is a Christian virtue, and it would be an oxymoron and quite impossible to do it in the name of something other than a long-term goal that is directly inspired by Christian ethos.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To those of you who continue harping on White Nationalists for not knowing about theological history instead of offering proactive solutions to help these people, you should know that most White Nationalists are not ignorant in that they ignore 2000 years of Christianity, but they are misled by jewish lies on their origins, as I have said before, and are pushed away from learning about it. The jews do not want Europeans to know their true history. So rather than castigating them as stupid pagans, if one is critical of them, why not teach them? However if you try to jewify their history and talk about Christianity as a jewish concept you will only turn them away further. This is why I've noticed that those of you who hate White Nationalists also believe that Christ was a jew and that everything we have inherited is from the jews, which is a falsehood. The jews are from Esau/ Edom, from the Caananites, from the Kenites, from Cain. Israel is not. If you deny this you are denying the scriptures. You give yourselves cognitive dissonance when confronted with this and it shows. The true history of the Israelites, and after Christ's time, the growth of the Church and the creation of the European racial homogeneity under Christendom is far more unifying and awakening. The Europeans are the descendants of the 12 tribes of the original Israelites, the jews are imposters. This alone should give every White man an impetus for serving Christendom through its morals, commandments, and adhesion to an Apostolic Church in its uncorrupted form. If more better men join the Church, then the Church benefits because it is representative as a body of its congregation. Not that they aren't all sinners, we all are, but if weak men are in charge of Church offices then we will see what we have been witnessing play out in the physical world, that of decay and waste.

I've seen more White Nationalists come to Christ in the past few years in dissident corners online when discovering their true heritage, even if they haven't yet joined an Apostolic Church. Of course the limp-wristed judeo-Christians of the west recoil and seethe at anything racialist which clearly shows the judaic parasite has attached itself to their minds. These fake Christians are willing to die on the hill of denying race, this is how powerful the lies of the jew are, which are indicative of the abilities of the devil to turn brother against brother over a lie. If any of you are going to refute my claims, refute my evidence first.

"What Happened to the 12 Tribes?"


Here's a verbal summary:

-Cuneiform tablets from the palace of Sargon I, translated in 1930, and their relevance to Israel is overlooked.
-707 BC Gimer, the Israelites were placed there, the Assyrian name for Israel, spy reports sent to Sargon from a frontier Assyrian post.
-The exiled Israelites were not slaves, owned homes, towns, farms, had an army. Why were they there? They were used as buffers to protect the border of the country.
-In 679, the Gimera, as the Israelites were called, rose in rebellion under their leader and fled westward.
-The translation is Cimmerians, they moved across Asia Minor and the Black Sea and settled in the Crimea and Carpathian regions west of the Black Sea, the mountains of Surith.
-When Babylon conquered the Assyrian empire in 612 BC, they've invaded Media where the Israelites in Media, and it drove the Gimera up to the Caucauses through the Pass of Israel, and went around east of the Caspian Sea, became known as Iskuzi, a name easily derived from Isaac.
-Babylonian name Gimira is translated as Sakka on the Persian tablets, meaning they are one in the same.
-Sakka then became Scuthae, then Scythian, derived from Iskua, derived from Isaac. This is the first mention of the word Scythian.
-Before the tribe went into exile they called themselves the house of Isaac. Archaeology has not only identified these Scythians as members of the house of Israel, but also pictures and depictions in gold work.

-Under pressure from the Persians, the Scythians (eastern branch) migrated north of the Black Sea, coming into collision with the Cimmerians (western branch) in the Carpathian regions. The kinship lost during the passing centuries, ensuing battles, ended with the Cimmerians being pushed out of the area moving westward. The Cimmerians broke into two major groups, the larger part migrated up the Danube river valley arriving at its source in south Germany between 600-100BC, called "Celts" by Roman historians. The smaller part moved into the Baltic where the Romans called them Cimbri.

-Between 4th and 1st centuries BC, the Scythians were driven northward towards the Baltic areas. By the end of the 2nd century, only two small of Scythians were left on the shores of the black sea, and they in turn pushed the Cimbri west to Jutland the coast of Holland. During this time the Celts were expanding in all directions, many of them pouring into Britain to perform the bedrock of the British race.

-In 300 BC, some of the Celts invaded Italy and sacked Rome, where others migrated into Asia Minor, who were called Galatians by the Greeks.
Paul's letters to the Galatians were to his kinsmen Israelites (called "gentiles" by the modern Bible translators).
Gentile means nations. Abraham was told by God he would spawn a company of nations.

-People are usually identified by the name of the land they live in. The Romans introduced the word German for Scythians, the word Germanus or Germanii, the latin word for "genuine".

-The Cimbri were driven out of northwest Europe, one group migrated into Spain known as Iberes, the Gaelic name for Hebrews. Many of those migrated into Ireland as Scots. They named the island Hibernia. Another group crossed the English channel to form the roots of the nation of the Picts. In the following centuries, the Scythian Germanic peoples broke into many divisions, possibly into many of their original Israelite tribal nations like the Anglees, Saxons, Jutes, and Danes.

-Between 450-600AD some of these Anglees and Saxons moved into Britain as Anglo-Saxons, and the Celtic Scots moved into norther Britain and established Scotland. Many Germanic tribes poured into the land south and established the Gothic nations, the Vandals, Lombards, Franks, Burgundians, Visigoths, Ostrogoths. These Scythian Germanic people, or tribes, formed the modern Germanic, Swiss, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese nations of the day.

-The northern Scythian Israelites that settled in Scandinavia, which we have read about in history raiding and establishing colonies in western Europe and Britain and Ireland, one group settled in France and became known as Normans, who forced their way into England under William the Conqueror.

What happened to the lost tribes of Israel? You now know the answer. They only lost their identities and migrated over the centuries.
God was keeping His promise all along, they went to the north, the south, the east, and the west. They formed the bedrock of the British nation, and the multitude of European nations. Europe and America is a regathering of Israel, who have been blinded to their identity.

"So long as the sun, moon, and stars exist, so will the descendants of Abraham continue as a nation before me."

Here is Jeremiah 31:10 in the Masoretic Text in ancient Hebrew:
"שִׁמְעוּ דְבַר־יְהוָה הַגּוֹיִם וְהַגִּידוּ בְּאִיִּים מִמְרָחֹק וּאִמְרוּ הֵזֵר יִשְׂרָאֵל יְקַבְּצֶהוּ וּנְטַעוֹתָיו יִפְקֹדוּ בּוֹ׃"
"Shimu d'var-Yahweh hagoyim vehagidu be'iyim mimerachok u'imru hezeir Yisrael yekabtsehu unetaotav yifkodu bo."
"Hear the word of the LORD, O nations, and proclaim it in distant coastlands: 'He who scattered Israel will gather them and will watch over his flock like a shepherd.' "

The Churches need to teach this history, and many more will flock to them. This does not get rid of atoning for original sin, confession, sacraments, prayer, and redemption. It only makes them more desirable to the awakened European. Clearly Patriot Front is nowhere on this level, but a group with their aims should be, and that is something the jews would never allow to flourish under their current despotism.
 
I'm all in favor of decucking efforts in existing churches, in some cases however it is indeed hopeless and I want to stress that the solution is not to abandon Christianity but to find it and defend it. Orthodox are bound to be hardliners on the true Church but I know how hard it is to reshape entire communities (though I know mass conversions of entire parishes have happened multiple times in American history). I just want to defend against the assertion you shared that real Christianity is long gone, it's not the case. And the true and righteous path is not going to be the easiest one. But your point that Orthodox are not as strong at evangelization is a fair one and a topic of frequent discussion amongst Orthodox. Nonetheless as I've mentioned before my parish is growing at an astounding rate (~15% growth this year I'd estimate) and I know it's not the only one.
I have changed jobs and moved between different places in America several times within the last few years, so I've been in a number of different Orthodox parish communities in different parts of the country.
Every Orthodox church I've experienced has reported strong growth. And I've seen it myself, sometimes pretty rapidly.
 
Back
Top