Nick Fuentes Thread

But he didn't just say they're mixed race. He called them "stinky curry munchers" - not word for word, but with the same meaning. Now, calling Vance a race traitor, or his wife a demon-worshipper is one thing, and it's fair. But for a grown man to insult kids age 2, 4 and 7, is a pu##y move.
I wasn't aware of this. It reminds me of why I am not a fan of his. I support his cause, but he spent years attacking "wignats" because of "optics" (so shortsighted) but then says something like this? Just not a good look.

He could simply point out that JD Vance isn't going to have Christians or Whites at the top of his priority because his own posterity, the most important thing to a man, are neither of these things and leave it at that. He is far too old to make these mistakes.
 
But he didn't just say they're mixed race. He called them "stinky curry munchers" - not word for word, but with the same meaning. Now, calling Vance a race traitor, or his wife a demon-worshipper is one thing, and it's fair. But for a grown man to insult kids age 2, 4 and 7, is a pu##y move.
Did he insult kids? To me it simply sounded like he was joking very broadly about the fact that it's a family of Indians and that Indians are smelly and use witchcraft. Regardless, it is incredibly rude to make jokes about someone's family, and in the video he very much acknowledges that it's incredibly rude. Which is exactly why he said it anyways, he finds that sort of thing funny and his audience finds it funny too. He just uses this type of extremely abrasive humor a lot, he'll verbally abuse his superchatters and such. I don't think it's that big of a deal, honestly.
 
Don't know anything about this guy other than a few here fawn over him, I don't really put much into internet whores. But from what I'm seeing this guy pretty much cemented himself as a grifter did he not?

If Kuntala won he would have praised himself for it but because Trump won he now has to do a 180 to keep himself relevant, his actual views mean nothing beyond soliciting a like and follower.

Why would anyone listen to this person any further?
 
Don't know anything about this guy other than a few here fawn over him, I don't really put much into internet whores. But from what I'm seeing this guy pretty much cemented himself as a grifter did he not?

If Kuntala won he would have praised himself for it but because Trump won he now has to do a 180 to keep himself relevant, his actual views mean nothing beyond soliciting a like and follower.

Why would anyone listen to this person any further?
Because he is part of the right-wing beyond Trump. In four years Trump will be gone. The fun guy who can sell Bush era policies by being a little off the cuff and very charismatic will be gone. And when people are still experiencing a diminished quality of life, from high crime, high COL, uncomfortable forced association, and endless wars draining the economy, they will not want to listen to JD Vance or Tom Cotton. They might push the same ideas and policies as Trump, but without Trump's charisma, they will fall short.

That is when people will look elsewhere, for answers, and as they get more desperate, they will look harder and be more willing to listen. Will it be Nick Fuentes himself? No, he isn't masculine and he behaves like a spoiled brat despite being 25 years old. But he will be a pipeline to the true right-wing movement that will come about. He will be the MAGA and libertarian pipeline to true Nationalism. And he will make a small fortune on the way to doing so.
 
Because he is part of the right-wing beyond Trump. In four years Trump will be gone. The fun guy who can sell Bush era policies by being a little off the cuff and very charismatic will be gone. And when people are still experiencing a diminished quality of life, from high crime, high COL, uncomfortable forced association, and endless wars draining the economy, they will not want to listen to JD Vance or Tom Cotton. They might push the same ideas and policies as Trump, but without Trump's charisma, they will fall short.

That is when people will look elsewhere, for answers, and as they get more desperate, they will look harder and be more willing to listen. Will it be Nick Fuentes himself? No, he isn't masculine and he behaves like a spoiled brat despite being 25 years old. But he will be a pipeline to the true right-wing movement that will come about. He will be the MAGA and libertarian pipeline to true Nationalism. And he will make a small fortune on the way to doing so.

None of that has anything to do with him telling people not to vote for trump and then jumping on the bandwagon to keep himself relevant. Like a true grifter whore.
 
None of that has anything to do with him telling people not to vote for trump and then jumping on the bandwagon to keep himself relevant. Like a true grifter whore.
Yes it did, you asked who would still listen to him and I told you. Young men who will still not able to afford a home and start a family, even after four years of Trump's policies are not going to buy into JD Vance or Tom Cotton. I'm not saying either of those two will lose, but they will not satisfy the growing righteous resentment we are seeing from young men.

Will they stay with Nick? No, they will realize they need someone more serious. But, did that 180 hurt Nick? No, because he is ahead of the curve and one of the few discussing the serious issues young men face.
 
Yes it did, you asked who would still listen to him and I told you. Young men who will still not able to afford a home and start a family, even after four years of Trump's policies are not going to buy into JD Vance or Tom Cotton. I'm not saying either of those two will lose, but they will not satisfy the growing righteous resentment we are seeing from young men.

Will they stay with Nick? No, they will realize they need someone more serious. But, did that 180 hurt Nick? No, because he is ahead of the curve and one of the few discussing the serious issues young men face.

So you agree that people won't listen to him because again he's a dishonest grifter internet whore, they'll listen to someone else.

Got it thanks, I wasn't talking about anyone or anything but him.
 
So you agree that people won't listen to him because again he's a dishonest grifter internet whore, they'll listen to someone else.

Got it thanks, I wasn't talking about anyone or anything but him.

They will listen to him, until someone bigger and better comes along. Even then, because he was so far ahead of the curve, I think he will still potentially be a main influencer in that arena. That arena right now is Dan Bilzerian, Jake Shields, and Lucas Gage. Nick is another member of this group and so far, I do not see them kicking him out, I don't think any of them were pro-Trump. I don't think he will be a leader, but I think he will have some type of role, simply because he was ahead of the curve and because he is very polished. I'm not a big fan of his, but he has an audience, and this childish post didn't hurt him with his current audience.
 
So you agree that people won't listen to him because again he's a dishonest grifter internet whore, they'll listen to someone else.

Got it thanks, I wasn't talking about anyone or anything but him.

Have you ever watched him speak? He's very honest and clear about his motivations and concerns.

For example he was very clear on what it would take to get his endorsement for the presidential election - 10 year immigration moratorium, and no war with Iran. Trump refused to even acknowledge these concerns so he didn't get the endorsement, simple as.

These issues are incredibly important for the long-term prospects of white Americans and totally ignored by Trump. The former because legal immigration at the current levels will result in whites becoming a minority in the US in 18 years, and this is likely to accelerate as Trump and Musk are heavily in favour of high legal immigration. The negative effects of this and mass immigration suppressing wages, leading to more expensive housing, the negative effects of high ethnic diversity, etc make it an important issue.

The latter because America has been under ZOG control for a long time and still will be under Trump, so more American lives will be lost to fighting Israel's opponents in the Middle-East. Whilst actions like designating AIPAC a foreign entity, firing Zionist government employees, etc will also do great harm to ZOG's agenda the highest impact single action will be to stop fighting Israel's wars.

On election night he was getting >70k viewers on his Rumble livestream, more than virtually anyone else except Steven Crowder, and this is as a one-man show. He's addressing issues than nobody else is, and as long as he continues to do so will retain his huge popularity amongst the right-wing.
 
Have you ever watched him speak? He's very honest and clear about his motivations and concerns.

For example he was very clear on what it would take to get his endorsement for the presidential election - 10 year immigration moratorium, and no war with Iran. Trump refused to even acknowledge these concerns so he didn't get the endorsement, simple as.

These issues are incredibly important for the long-term prospects of white Americans and totally ignored by Trump. The former because legal immigration at the current levels will result in whites becoming a minority in the US in 18 years, and this is likely to accelerate as Trump and Musk are heavily in favour of high legal immigration. The negative effects of this and mass immigration suppressing wages, leading to more expensive housing, the negative effects of high ethnic diversity, etc make it an important issue.

The latter because America has been under ZOG control for a long time and still will be under Trump, so more American lives will be lost to fighting Israel's opponents in the Middle-East. Whilst actions like designating AIPAC a foreign entity, firing Zionist government employees, etc will also do great harm to ZOG's agenda the highest impact single action will be to stop fighting Israel's wars.

On election night he was getting >70k viewers on his Rumble livestream, more than virtually anyone else except Steven Crowder, and this is as a one-man show. He's addressing issues than nobody else is, and as long as he continues to do so will retain his huge popularity amongst the right-wing.
He is actually pretty popular, and it is one of those "I guess I am just too old" things. I don't find him all the entertaining, but he does a decent job on debate nights and stuff like that. He has some great clips floating around on twitter that get a lot of likes. And some of his tweets go viral.

I even saw Ben Shapiro just talking trash on him due to this election win. So, he has broken through and now Ben can no longer ignore him. And Ben should watch out, now that his audience knows who Nick is, if Trump isn't successful, it is over for Ben, and they will go over to Nick.

 
Have you ever watched him speak? He's very honest and clear about his motivations and concerns.

For example he was very clear on what it would take to get his endorsement for the presidential election - 10 year immigration moratorium, and no war with Iran. Trump refused to even acknowledge these concerns so he didn't get the endorsement, simple as.

These issues are incredibly important for the long-term prospects of white Americans and totally ignored by Trump. The former because legal immigration at the current levels will result in whites becoming a minority in the US in 18 years, and this is likely to accelerate as Trump and Musk are heavily in favour of high legal immigration. The negative effects of this and mass immigration suppressing wages, leading to more expensive housing, the negative effects of high ethnic diversity, etc make it an important issue.

The latter because America has been under ZOG control for a long time and still will be under Trump, so more American lives will be lost to fighting Israel's opponents in the Middle-East. Whilst actions like designating AIPAC a foreign entity, firing Zionist government employees, etc will also do great harm to ZOG's agenda the highest impact single action will be to stop fighting Israel's wars.

On election night he was getting >70k viewers on his Rumble livestream, more than virtually anyone else except Steven Crowder, and this is as a one-man show. He's addressing issues than nobody else is, and as long as he continues to do so will retain his huge popularity amongst the right-wing.

I'm all about that stuff I think we all are but it's difficult to lend any credibility to someone who did what he did. It comes off as someone who will say and do anything for self promotion, as bad as any celebrity, politician or jew....the fact that we may agree with his messaging doesn't change his actual actions, the issue isn't with his message.
 
There is also a new, and growing fad troll angle, where young men are telling young women "your body, my choice", pretty much sick of the disgusting behavior of young women in the west and causing them to melt down.

This was also started by Nick on election night. It is sort of how he gets new nomenclature in our society, just trolling and being funny.

 
I'm all about that stuff I think we all are but it's difficult to lend any credibility to someone who did what he did. It comes off as someone who will say and do anything for self promotion, as bad as any celebrity, politician or jew....the fact that we may agree with his messaging doesn't change his actual actions, the issue isn't with his message.

It's very well reasoned, see his full explanation video of why he's not voting Trump for more. TL;DR: you need to vote as a bloc in order to get your demands met, otherwise if you just vote for the lesser evil each time then the candidate can comfortably ignore you knowing you'll always vote for them no matter what.

There is also a new, and growing fad troll angle, where young men are telling young women "your body, my choice", pretty much sick of the disgusting behavior of young women in the west and causing them to melt down.

This was also started by Nick on election night. It is sort of how he gets new nomenclature in our society, just trolling and being funny.



Yeah that clip has really blown up on social media.

 
It's very well reasoned, see his full explanation video of why he's not voting Trump for more. TL;DR: you need to vote as a bloc in order to get your demands met, otherwise if you just vote for the lesser evil each time then the candidate can comfortably ignore you knowing you'll always vote for them no matter what.



Yeah that clip has really blown up on social media.



I don't care why he didn't vote for Trump that isn't the issue. I've stated very clearly the issue is the turn he made after Trump was elected which destroys his integrity and reveals him to be nothing more than a grifter who leans whichever way benefits him.

I realize many of you are desperate for a voice but you should be wary of who you put minds into instead of falling for someone who is simply interested in self promotion and burying your head in the sand to it because you want his message to be carried.
 
I don't care why he didn't vote for Trump that isn't the issue. I've stated very clearly the issue is the turn he made after Trump was elected which destroys his integrity and reveals him to be nothing more than a grifter who leans whichever way benefits him.

I realize many of you are desperate for a voice but you should be wary of who you put minds into instead of falling for someone who is simply interested in self promotion and burying your head in the sand to it because you want his message to be carried.

There is a big big weakness with a certain segment of the "disaffected right" online. They blindly place their full faith and trust into anyone who says a few magic words about Jews. As if that's somehow revelatory information to anyone who's been paying attention.

This leaves them open for well poisoning, being influenced by grifters, bad actors, divide and conquer schemes, fed ops. Some of these based right wing Jew namers were trying to tell everyone that the covid lockdowns were a good thing and vaccine critics are retards a few years back. That's when I first realized that these groups were compromised.

There's a clear pattern with these compromised factions. They spend a long period of time cultivating a dedicated fanbases by appealing to their common sense. Then after they have fostered a "dependency" among their listeners, they come out of left field with some insanely crazy shit like lockdowns are great, voting for coconut brat mommy Kamala is great, and a certain percentage of their core audience who has been trained to outsource their opinions to them, who they have fostered a dependency with, remain on board with the lunacy.

Isolated people looking for Internet daddies can be made to think and do all manner of insane things. In the end, people should trust in their own conscience and gut instincts.

The best part of this election for me is seeing all of these bad actors get humiliated and forced to try an backpedal or come up with some other cope as to why everyone has rejected their "superior" points of view on everything.
 
I don't care why he didn't vote for Trump that isn't the issue. I've stated very clearly the issue is the turn he made after Trump was elected which destroys his integrity and reveals him to be nothing more than a grifter who leans whichever way benefits him.

I realize many of you are desperate for a voice but you should be wary of who you put minds into instead of falling for someone who is simply interested in self promotion and burying your head in the sand to it because you want his message to be carried.
I think most would agree with your point about him posting support of a Trump victory. I would like to know his thinking behind it and if asked, I guarantee he would act feminine and not directly answer it, which is why I am not a fan of his.

Surprisingly, and maybe even disappointingly as well, it doesn't seem to have hurt his popularity. But overtime his attitude will sink him as better men take his place.
 
There is a big big weakness with a certain segment of the "disaffected right" online. They blindly place their full faith and trust into anyone who says a few magic words about Jews. As if that's somehow revelatory information to anyone who's been paying attention.

This leaves them open for well poisoning, being influenced by grifters, bad actors, divide and conquer schemes, fed ops. Some of these based right wing Jew namers were trying to tell everyone that the covid lockdowns were a good thing and vaccine critics are retards a few years back. That's when I first realized that these groups were compromised.

There's a clear pattern with these compromised factions. They spend a long period of time cultivating a dedicated fanbases by appealing to their common sense. Then after they have fostered a "dependency" among their listeners, they come out of left field with some insanely crazy shit like lockdowns are great, voting for coconut brat mommy Kamala is great, and a certain percentage of their core audience who has been trained to outsource their opinions to them, who they have fostered a dependency with, remain on board with the lunacy.

Isolated people looking for Internet daddies can be made to think and do all manner of insane things. In the end, people should trust in their own conscience and gut instincts.

The best part of this election for me is seeing all of these bad actors get humiliated and forced to try an backpedal or come up with some other cope as to why everyone has rejected their "superior" points of view on everything.
A lot of what you wrote has merit. But for many in the anti-Trump far-right wing, their points of view are only going to grow stronger. Trump either does the right thing, or he will just prove them right. I expect the latter, so soon these people will grow by leaps and bounds, and by 2028, it will be a much different ballgame. The GOP will no longer have Trump to make their terrible ideas sound good and the DNC will be the DNC, which leaves 10's of millions of young men looking for something better.
 
I think most would agree with your point about him posting support of a Trump victory. I would like to know his thinking behind it and if asked, I guarantee he would act feminine and not directly answer it, which is why I am not a fan of his.

Surprisingly, and maybe even disappointingly as well, it doesn't seem to have hurt his popularity. But overtime his attitude will sink him as better men take his place.


His thinking is simple, he built himself around the concept of being this great alternative voice and when it didn't work out as planned to further his narrative he had to pivot for self preservation. Had Kuntala won he would have been praising himself to high heaven and kept pushing his same narrative with his nose in the air, but since it didn't work out for him.....well here we are, all of a sudden "we" did it. Praising the victory of a man he tried to convince everyone not to vote for, behavior rivaling any celebrity, politician or jew.

I don't see how any self respecting man can put anything into him anymore.
 
Back
Top