The real deception here is believing that nukes are fake, it's a psyop that belongs to the same families of psyops as flat earth, dinosaurs are fake etc. These psyops date from the Cass Sunstein era under Obama, they were put in place to counter the growing truth movement that grew in an era of relatively unregulated high-speed internet.
The main premise for your deception, the idea that nukes are fake and were created in order to scare people just doesn't make sense, because there has not been a concerted effort to build up public fear of nuclear war since the 1980s. To the contrary, the public is actually being primed to become pro-war and to ignore the growing risks of nuclear escalation, because the PTB view nuclear war as a great way to cull the populace.
The main goal of the nukes are fake psyop is to divide the truther community and make us look stupid to normies.
I think it's time we have a proper echo chamber on this subject, more so than any other particular look at the various topics which you allege to be psyops.
You are vastly confusing one set of tactics (theoretical cognitive infiltration) with another set of tactics (alphabet agency badges aka 1811's actively infiltrating dissident groups to steer them to commit crimes in order to keep funding their own existence). There are other sets of tactics as well, like Israeli/Mossad presence on websites which expose their crimes and lies in order to calm people down from going full 1488, and SEC agents posing as dupes with the intention of tripping people up into committing financial or white collar crimes (like what almost happened to Coach red pill). In regards to what you are talking about, it does not check out to be something that leads people away from truth, but rather towards it. Why are people supposed to accept this entire corrupted system and all of its tenets at face value? The system itself is putting out these narratives of cosmology, physics, and prehistory, all of which are full of holes. To look in to them is not to do Cass Sunstein's bidding, but to verify that we are surrounded by a web of lies. A psyop, or psychological operation, is something like Project Mockingbird, Project MK Ultra, Qanon.
Do you think the mere discussion of these topics, and the presentation of evidence against the mainstream narrative is pushing Cass' agenda? If so, it is proof you have not comprehended his work, and is not a valid argument. The concept of cognitive infiltration, as described in the academic paper "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures" that he co-authored with Adrian Vermeule, involved the idea of government agents or third-party individuals engaging with online communities where conspiracy theories are discussed. The goal, in theory, would be to introduce alternative information or arguments to challenge and disrupt what the authors perceived as potentially dangerous conspiracy beliefs. I believe that this has taken place, but it is specifically in regards to concurrent social and political ordeals. There is incredible cognitive infiltration in right-wing conservative groups in America, and in right-wing anti-immigration parties in western Europe. Many times these are not paid government agents but other actors who have a vested interest in the status quo. Here are some quotes from his paper:
"We aim here to sketch some psychological and social mechanisms that produce, sustain, and spread these theories, to show that some of them are quite important and should be taken seriously; and to offer suggestions for governmental responses, both as a matter of policy and as a matter of law."
"We address several dilemmas of governmental response to conspiracy theories, such as the question whether it is better to rebut such theories, at the risk of legitimating them, or to ignore them, at the risk of leaving them unrebutted. Conspiracy theories turn out to be especially hard to undermine or dislodge; they have a self-sealing quality rendering them particularly immune to challenge. We suggest several policy responses that can dampen the supply of conspiracy theorizing, in part by introducing diverse viewpoints and new factual assumptions into the hard-core groups that produce such theories. Our principal claim here involves the potential value of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, designed to introduce informational diversity into such groups and to expose indefensible conspiracy theories as such."
"Here we suggest two concrete ideas for government officials attempting to fashion a response to such theories. First, responding to more rather than fewer conspiracy theories has a kind of synergy benefit: it reduces the legitimiating effect of responding to any one of them, because it dilutes the contrast with unrebutted theories. Second, we suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity."
Sunstein claims that conspiracy theorists suffer from "crippled epistemology" meaning that they know very few things and what they know is wrong, and that they only hear the conspiratorial accounts of government behavior. He does not provide any footnote or evidence that conspiracy theorists are more likely than others (mainstream believers) to get their news from one source, but he uses this false premise as his justification to rationalize his authoritarian proposals.
All three of the topics you mentioned predate the notion of cognitive infiltration as defined by Cass Sunstein and I know this because I discussed all of them with people even in the 90s, although it was not as prevalent as today given the internet expansion. The ideas and debates surrounding the shape of the Earth, the authenticity of nuclear weapons, the existence of dinosaurs, and other conspiracy theories have been present for a much longer period than the timeframe associated with Cass Sunstein's role as the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs under the Obongo administration. While Cass Sunstein's paper addresses conspiracy theories in the context of modern communication, it does not serve as the origin point for debates about Earth's shape, nuclear weapons, or the existence of dinosaurs. These discussions are multifaceted and have roots in manifold historical, scientific, and ethnic contexts.
The topics that Cass Sunstein had in mind were specifically involved in America's Foreign Policy, the 9/11 conspiracy, and the ever-growing battle to take away gun rights and eventually guns from the citizens in the chaotic dialectic of government-funded mass shootings, or completely fake mass shootings with a revolving set of crisis actors like Sandy Hook, because these are critically dangerous to the power of the vultures and shareholders in DC, and their cousins in Tel Aviv.
Discussing the geometry of the earth, the physics and chemistry of explosives, and the biological reality of species in a timeline that doesn't reflect the history books are viewed as fringe topics. And as one who has studied them all, I will say, yes they are fringe! But that is the level of information one needs to know before embarking on discovering these truths, not everyone can do it. People can easily take time out of their day to say yes or no to deadly jewish vaxxes, or swindling jewish taxes, but to entirely re-investigate the laws of nature themselves is a daunting task that not every truth-seeker is equipped to embark upon.
In each thread, the cosmology thread, this thread about nukes, and the dragons/dinosaurs thread, there is bound to be someone who cannot see the distinctions between the different tactics of those who push the mainstream narratives and the different philosophical and historical mores which are implicated in the reality of those who see these narratives as complete lies. These people simply wants to believe that a fed is lurking behind every corner. The feds and fed-friendlies that were on the RVF usually told people to keep voting Trump their way out of all their problems, and would sometimes occasionally and erroneously chime-in something that just came down the pipeline from Langley, whether it be referring to a tranny as its "preferred pronouns" or feeding alleged updates about new changes being introduced in regards to the corona scam. Most feds are not high-earners, they are simply cops with an extra set of privileges, and because an 1811 cannot be sued like a normal cop can, they can engage in more risky behavior, sometimes condoned, other times just like a child would if given too much freedom.
Also there are only so many hours in a week, in a month, in a year. There is not enough time for a federal agent to co-opt people discussing "earth not round" and "nukes are fake" for any foreseeable and acceptable goal. People will be questioning the first forever, and the latter until either armageddon or Kingdom come. To have a classical education, to come from landed gentry, to have lived through several decades of changing times, to be fluent in multiple languages, and have an incredibly high IQ to put to a functioning purpose describes very few people in this world, let alone a sizeable demographic of the enforcers of the tyrannical judeo-masonic military industrial complex and its proxy governments as employed by the familiar alphabet agencies we all know of (even the ones we do not know of).
There are plenty of psyops which I never see you chiming in on, perhaps those are the ones you should be rooting out the Sunstein agents in. Voting for one. The complete control of the medical mafia over health and wellness and ultimately our survival is another. Exposing the murders committed to and abetted by federal law enforcement agencies on behalf of the hegelian dialectic of power is another. Qanon was a complete glowing biomass. These are areas in which "alternate and misleading information" are purposefully introduced to keep people in their bubbles without autonomy.
So I say this in good earnest, after much research, that I do not believe atom-splitting occurred, and neither did Werner Heisenberg in 1945 when he heard about the bombings of Japan. The reactions in demolitions from introducing various elements can and do create intensely larger explosions, but what an unlearned man doesn't know he cannot dispute. The abstract community of quantum physics is a nebulous void where most of its attendees are lost in their own delusions. The idea that we men, fallen creatures of fallen flesh, are manipulating the building blocks behind the veil of creation and can destroy ourselves and our world entirely with our discoveries is some inverted Promethean hubris and a direct affront to having true faith in a Creator God with all of His power. There are some barriers that can never be broken in this existence, because ultimately we are not in control of it. There are biblical implications for studying these topics, because the enemy is in charge of these mainstream narratives, but the enemy will not inherit the earth. The entire schema of the mainstream has us living in a fake "reality" where they are writing the script and editing it every day.
There is no word for coincidence in Hebrew.
"Cognitive Infiltration Called Out!"
For all I know, this is a cognitive infiltrator calling out cognitive infiltration.
"The mainstream exists to attack the internet"
Just listen to the talking heads with their state-approved mouth time, they know what's best for the goys.
Here is a bit of a long podcast, but Michael Collins Piper is talking specifically about how the aftermath of Sandy Hook is an example of a cognitive infiltration psyop:
"Michael Collins Piper - Sandy Hook and the Cognitive Infiltration of the Truth Movement"
I will agree with you that there is a lot of flak out there, but to make the truther community look bad is entirely the point of the mainstream. This is war. They will fight to the bitter end to see their worldview prevail, and I will fight to the bitter end to see that theirs does not prevail. These topics need to be looked at deeper by more people.
