Hitler versus Rothschild: the Logistics and Background of World War Two

[Samseau]

Hitler was no megalomaniac cult leader as the usual lies claim. He was the figurehead of a cause that millions across Europe and beyond voluntarily embraced to defend their homelands and resist Bolshevik tyranny. The Waffen-SS alone drew hundreds of thousands from many nations even winning the loyalty of entire Soviet units who defected to fight under Germay's banner.

Meanwhile the Allies relied heavily on forced conscription drafting tens of millions of unwilling men into a war they neither wanted nor understood. The American draft alone pulled over 10 million young men into a conflict manufactured by FDR’s warmongering agenda.

British troops fought under warmongering alcoholic Churchill whose reckless bloodlust drove millions of young men into needless carnage to serve imperial ambitions only to lose it all. Soviet soldiers were expendable cannon fodder for Stalin’s brutal regime where human life meant nothing and millions were sacrificed in endless “meat grinder” offensives, following the grim logic of “we have more bodies than they have bullets.” No one would take an "oath" to Stalin because no one wanted to, he had zero personality or charm and inspired nobody.

This is the real difference. A majority of the Axis soldiers fought as free men by choice united by conviction and identity. Allied soldiers were slaves to their governments’ ambitions swept up in a war driven by propaganda and manipulation.

So when you hear the tired claims about Hitler’s “personality cult” or “lack of vision,” remember those are excuses from people who can’t explain without lying how millions freely rallied behind him while the Allies resorted to coercion and control. The Axis cause was powerfully real, unlike the manufactured loyalty on the other side

Except that Hitler and other Axis powers did institute drafts and did force men to fight. See the story posted earlier in this thread of the Catholic man who was executed for refusing to take the Hitler oath. He agreed to fight but not take the oath and was executed.

So the historical evidence directly contradicts your claims. Meanwhile Americans were signing up by the millions because of Pearl Harbor, Japan was completely retarded. FDR's brainwashing was only successful because Japan took the bait.

Hitler worshippers simply can't learn from mistakes, which is why White nationalism has no future. The adherents have no imagination, no ability to analyze or strategize. It's amazing the lengths ideologues will defend losers. It's worse than communism, at least communism produced a few countries which survived like China.

the TLDR of every discussion

Says the hypocrite who rides on Christianity yet never discusses it. 0 posts from you in the Christian section.

 

[Samseau]

Hitler was dismissive of the USA, prior to WW2 for many reasons, though he does point out what a joke "democracy" was back then, the same as it is today. The "democracy" of the USA in the 1930's is the same as today. Controlled by Wall Street, and both candidates are puppets, so it doesn't matter who wins, Wall Street still wins.

He was dismissive of the USA, because the same communist bankers he defeated already completely controlled the USA, complete with their puppet FDR. That Americans just did as told, suffered through a depression despite having unlimited resources, while Germany prospered. The USA govt. was then using its wealth, which there was little due to the depression, to build up Stalin's military in a plan to attack Germany. While USA tax money was being wasted to kill millions of innocent Christians all across Eastern Europe and thousands of churches were being burned down, Hitler reached out to England, France and the USA for peaceful negations to take on Stalin.

The fact the USA helped build up the USSR, while the USSR was killing millions of Christians and burning down churches is enough to make any reasonable Christian untrusting of the Americans and the reason many German soldiers referred to the USA troops as "Godless Americans".

The propaganda machine was in full effect and it was powerful, but Hitler played into that frame by attacking America in his speeches and writings. Far better ways he could have handled it without giving the enemy ammo.

Back in the 1930's most Americans were simply uneducated and had no idea what was going on, either in the USSR or Germany. When dealing with ignorance perception is everything and keeping the public out of your business is always the best approach. Hitler also had great chances to win over the people of America as well:

That's in 1933, he was getting plenty of positive press in America.

Hitler's mistake was not in respecting the satanic USA, it was in not waiting to go to war until their technology was so advanced that they could not be defeated. Had they waited a year or two and advanced what they were working on, they likely would have won the war. Hitler admitted this mistake to Von Braun in their last communication.

Which is what I've said from the start of this thread, that Hitler was an idiot who could have easily won had he taken the slow route to victory instead of foolish all or nothing gambits. Germany had so many advantages it's incredible that they lost, takes talent to lose with such advantages.

Like I said at the start of this thread, Hitler just needed to tech up, let the USSR spend itself attacking Poland, playing the diplomatic game with France and England, and then making his move. By attacking first he turned American opinion against him which caused Germany to lose the war.

Had Germany waited until, say, even 1942 to fight back:

- Stronger military tech.
- Better diplomatic position because the USSR would have been the aggressor against Poland.
- A dying FDR and more sympathetic America.

-1933 Germany faced a jewish-led global boycott before Hitler did anything (march 23-24).

-1934 Hollywood (run by jews Mayer, Goldwyn, Warner) was pumping out anti-German films like The House of Rothschild. Germany formally protested the US laughed it off.

-1936 FDR's re-election campaign openly cast Hitler as a global menace before any hostilities before Anschluss or Poland.-FDR’s inner circle (Morgenthau, Frankfurter, Baruch, Brandeis) were fanatically anti-German. Hitler still held back, he kept a neutral tone on America until late 1941.

-The US refused fair trade. Germany offered barter arrangements to avoid Wall Street debt traps; Cordell Hull and FDR’s clique slammed the door.

-FDR never replaced Ambassador William Dodd after he left Berlin in 1937. That’s a diplomatic snub of the highest order basically saying, "You’re not a legitimate government."

-Then in the 1937 Chicago “Quarantine” speech, Roosevelt called Hitler a gangster years before war. Not provoked, just hostile.

None of these points really change anything. FDR was a Talmud puppet, but the American people were not.

Hitler was elected for life, and could have easily outlasted FDR whose health was declining fast.

Germany still could have accessed resources America had through 3rd parties like Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and even Italy, which is difficult to believe but apparently true.

See the neutrality acts:

Neutrality Acts of the 1930s - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Even as late as 1939 Senators were talking about how Germany could just buy through Italy:

An "outstanding Republican leader" who supported helping nations under attack, however, told H. V. Kaltenborn that the embargo was futile because a neutral country like Italy could buy from the US and sell its own weapons to Germany, while US companies would relocate factories to Canada.

The idea that Germany was being choked out and needed war is just White Nationalist propaganda with no basis in reality.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The propaganda machine was in full effect and it was powerful, but Hitler played into that frame by attacking America in his speeches and writings. Far better ways he could have handled it without giving the enemy ammo.

Back in the 1930's most Americans were simply uneducated and had no idea what was going on, either in the USSR or Germany. When dealing with ignorance perception is everything and keeping the public out of your business is always the best approach. Hitler also had great chances to win over the people of America as well:

That's in 1933, he was getting plenty of positive press in America.



Which is what I've said from the start of this thread, that Hitler was an idiot who could have easily won had he taken the slow route to victory instead of foolish all or nothing gambits. Germany had so many advantages it's incredible that they lost, takes talent to lose with such advantages.

Like I said at the start of this thread, Hitler just needed to tech up, let the USSR spend itself attacking Poland, playing the diplomatic game with France and England, and then making his move. By attacking first he turned American opinion against him which caused Germany to lose the war.

Had Germany waited until, say, even 1942 to fight back:

- Stronger military tech.
- Better diplomatic position because the USSR would have been the aggressor against Poland.
- A dying FDR and more sympathetic America.



None of these points really change anything. FDR was a Talmud puppet, but the American people were not.

Hitler was elected for life, and could have easily outlasted FDR whose health was declining fast.

Germany still could have accessed resources America had through 3rd parties like Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and even Italy, which is difficult to believe but apparently true.

See the neutrality acts:

Neutrality Acts of the 1930s - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Even as late as 1939 Senators were talking about how Germany could just buy through Italy:



The idea that Germany was being choked out and needed war is just White Nationalist propaganda with no basis in reality.

I think we mostly agree then. But the USA was firmly in the hands of the satanic elites and the people in the USA had no real means to get real news or information out of Europe, it was all filtered through the main stream media. So much so that Father Coughlin was taken off air, despite being the most popular radio show in the USA, because he opposed the USA getting involved in war in Europe.

The USA was going to be involved and Hitler should have foreseen this and waited longer. Granted, what little I have read of him, he thought the German volk could fight through about anything, if pushed hard enough. Not many men have the fight in them that he had and he miscalculated this and cost a chance at winning the war. Pride, a lesson for us all to learn.

But the USA was not going to support Germany, the people here didn't know. Heck, what percent of Americans today still think satanic third world immigration, LGBTQ being taught to 5-year-olds, and anti-White/anti-family policies are "good things"? Probably nearly 50% and that is with the internet to allow us to actually get truthful information.

 

[Australia Sucks]

So much bloviating on this thread about Hitler. The dude lost. That is the most important point that negates all other potential positives about Hitler. He lost the war and millions of Germans died. End of story.

 

[Blade Runner]

Has anyone seen the Jack Kruse interview with Robert Breedlove? Amazing stuff, even if all the details or speculation isn't exactly right.

 

[ginsu]

@Australia Sucks yours and others argument boils down to two things:

Hitler lost. 2. Therefore nothing good can be learned from the NS period.
This is postwar liberal moralism that masquerades as analysis. Samseau cannot win a battle of details so he avoids them or just cites wikipedia articles permitted by his talmuds like a normie who is too lazy to look for the truth.

Germany instituted most conscription in 1943 when manpower became desperate but in 1939–1942 the Waffen-SS had hundreds of thousands of foreign volunteers from over 30 nations many of whom had no German blood. Every last one of Spain's Axis fighters were volunteers. They weren’t conscripted or tricked. These men were ideologically motivated, which is not the insult Samseau thinks it is. The Allies never had anything like that. Their fiat money systems survived, but the ideology of Hitler will outlive all their systems even if it was just 1 man who believed in it and not the millions that still do.

The claim that Americans “rushed to sign up” ignores reality. 10.1 million men were conscripted and most of them teenagers. Just read their letters. Half didn’t even know what Europe had to do with them. They didn’t join to fight ‘evil’ they joined because they had no choice. The number of people who were conscripted on the Allied behalf per capita far outweighs those conscripted on the Axis side.

Read the earlier posts where MFTP clearly provided details on Jagerstatter who was executed not for refusing to fight or refusing to "swear an oath" but for encouraging military sedition under wartime law. One man’s emotional post-war "martyrdom" doesn’t prove an entire military system was coercive. But it does reveal how little an uneducated anti-Hitler agitator knows if they think Jagerstatter is some universal example.

Here’s the truth you guys either don't know or refuse to acknowledge, the NS economic system broke free of international finance, rebuilt a destroyed nation, eliminated mass unemployment, stabilized prices, built public works and a quality of life unmatched in Europe. That’s why it had to be destroyed not because it was evil but because it cut out the money powers and worked tremendously. The entire "6 million" mythos is a mockery figure that covers up the occupational recovery of Hitler creating and filling over 6 million jobs for unemployed Germans from Weimar.

Samseau calls this ‘worshipping losers’. Where is worship exactly? It is studying suppressed victories. Because when you actually know history, the fact that Hitler ‘lost’ doesn’t explain why the world is still monetarily enslaved today as it was before his interruption. But his economic model does offer a path forward. He achieved an economic victory between 1933-1945 that no communist country can ever boast of not even the US. No one had that kind of financial freedom since before Waterloo.

Since you guys constantly go back to the red pill, why do those of you who care about winning so much ignore the most obvious red pill of them all here being the economic one? It inspired similar nationalizing and economic attempts by Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, and Gaddafi, all had similar ideologies based on NS, the money powers lied about all of them too.

Also @It_Is_My_Time just curious where is the proof that Hitler was antagonizing America before the war? I looked at MFTP's timeline in this post here: https://christisking.cc/threads/hit...round-of-world-war-two.797/page-12#post-85904

and searched these events.. there is zero antagonizing from Hitler to the US before the war but plenty of hostilities and open smearing of Germany from the US. The only time Hitler verbally attacked the US was his speech on Dec 11th 1941 when he declared war on them, after years of US subversive belligerency against Germany and 6 months of supplying the USSR with lend lease. He talks about what America was doing before the war in heavy details:

 

[Острог]

All of this is not to worship Hitler but to be historically honest. As Christians we have an obligation to seek the truth and part of that is also to discern this topic. If we make exceptions then I don't see how we would differ from others who judge how they see fit, we could be talmudic jews then AFAIC.

 

[magoo]

@Australia Sucks yours and others argument boils down to two things:

Hitler lost. 2. Therefore nothing good can be learned from the NS period.
This is postwar liberal moralism that masquerades as analysis. Samseau cannot win a battle of details so he avoids them or just cites wikipedia articles permitted by his talmuds like a normie who is too lazy to look for the truth.

Germany instituted most conscription in 1943 when manpower became desperate but in 1939–1942 the Waffen-SS had hundreds of thousands of foreign volunteers from over 30 nations many of whom had no German blood. Every last one of Spain's Axis fighters were volunteers. They weren’t conscripted or tricked. These men were ideologically motivated, which is not the insult Samseau thinks it is. The Allies never had anything like that. Their fiat money systems survived, but the ideology of Hitler will outlive all their systems even if it was just 1 man who believed in it and not the millions that still do.

The claim that Americans “rushed to sign up” ignores reality. 10.1 million men were conscripted and most of them teenagers. Just read their letters. Half didn’t even know what Europe had to do with them. They didn’t join to fight ‘evil’ they joined because they had no choice. The number of people who were conscripted on the Allied behalf per capita far outweighs those conscripted on the Axis side.

Read the earlier posts where MFTP clearly provided details on Jagerstatter who was executed not for refusing to fight or refusing to "swear an oath" but for encouraging military sedition under wartime law. One man’s emotional post-war "martyrdom" doesn’t prove an entire military system was coercive. But it does reveal how little an uneducated anti-Hitler agitator knows if they think Jagerstatter is some universal example.

Here’s the truth you guys either don't know or refuse to acknowledge, the NS economic system broke free of international finance, rebuilt a destroyed nation, eliminated mass unemployment, stabilized prices, built public works and a quality of life unmatched in Europe. That’s why it had to be destroyed not because it was evil but because it cut out the money powers and worked tremendously. The entire "6 million" mythos is a mockery figure that covers up the occupational recovery of Hitler creating and filling over 6 million jobs for unemployed Germans from Weimar.

Samseau calls this ‘worshipping losers’. Where is worship exactly? It is studying suppressed victories. Because when you actually know history, the fact that Hitler ‘lost’ doesn’t explain why the world is still monetarily enslaved today as it was before his interruption. But his economic model does offer a path forward. He achieved an economic victory between 1933-1945 that no communist country can ever boast of not even the US. No one had that kind of financial freedom since before Waterloo.

Since you guys constantly go back to the red pill, why do those of you who care about winning so much ignore the most obvious red pill of them all here being the economic one? It inspired similar nationalizing and economic attempts by Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, and Gaddafi, all had similar ideologies based on NS, the money powers lied about all of them too.

Also @It_Is_My_Time just curious where is the proof that Hitler was antagonizing America before the war? I looked at MFTP's timeline in this post here: https://christisking.cc/threads/hit...round-of-world-war-two.797/page-12#post-85904

and searched these events.. there is zero antagonizing from Hitler to the US before the war but plenty of hostilities and open smearing of Germany from the US. The only time Hitler verbally attacked the US was his speech on Dec 11th 1941 when he declared war on them, after years of US subversive belligerency against Germany and 6 months of supplying the USSR with lend lease. He talks about what America was doing before the war in heavy details:

The consequences from Hitler policy was a completely subjugated and destroyed country. Wether he was right or wrong is debatable. Hitler was so nefarious to Germany that today Germany is still occupied. And will continue to be. Cause his loss can be considered one of the biggest fuckups of history. No ruler damaged so much his country. He fell for the jew trap. Any action against jews must be done through a coalition. No country alone can beat them. Cause they are internacional.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The consequences from Hitler policy was a completely subjugated and destroyed country. Wether he was right or wrong is debatable. Hitler was so nefarious to Germany that today Germany is still occupied. And will continue to be. Cause his loss can be considered one of the biggest fuckups of history. No ruler damaged so much his country. He fell for the jew trap. Any action against jews must be done through a coalition. No country alone can beat them. Cause they are internacional.

You just described what Germany was before Hitler. It was actually a lot worse before Hitler. Your post is very inaccurate, as many leaders have damaged their own countries much more.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

The consequences from Hitler policy was a completely subjugated and destroyed country. Wether he was right or wrong is debatable. Hitler was so nefarious to Germany that today Germany is still occupied. And will continue to be. Cause his loss can be considered one of the biggest fuckups of history. No ruler damaged so much his country. He fell for the jew trap. Any action against jews must be done through a coalition. No country alone can beat them. Cause they are internacional.

They had post WW1 starvation, then Weimar: starvation, degeneracy and reparations, all before Hitler, and from a coalition of countries. It's comparable to what happened after WW2, so he's not the sole source of Germany's 20th century problems.

Your simplistic analysis of Hitler is essentially the same as the post-war propaganda that he was the only bad guy on planet earth from 1939-1945.

 

[InspCallahan]

Wasn't the Axis or Wermacht a Coalition?

In a world that was getting smaller and encroaching Globo-Ho-Mo of the One World Talmudist, when was the perfect time to act against this Ancient International Force of Dark Principalities? I mean in my lousy assessment of things, any time to act was a crap shoot. Especially the falibility of humans and their Judas sell out ways against a power that can weaken or tempt any man who you may think your friend or ally.

 

[Australia Sucks]

It inspired similar nationalizing and economic attempts by Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, and Gaddafi, all had similar ideologies based on NS, the money powers lied about all of them too.

So your examples are all leaders that got killed by foreign governments. Going against the globalist system head on and getting yourself killed saves your country how exactly?

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

So your examples are all leaders that got killed by foreign governments. Going against the globalist system head on and getting yourself killed saves your country how exactly?

I would rather a leader get killed by foreign governments, for going against the satanic global order, than live in the USA or UK, where your men fought for the satanic NWO and now their countries are far worse off for "winning" the war.

 

[Острог]

These podcasts keep coming like on demand.

https://podcastaddict.com/the-pete-quinones-show/episode/199834213

 

[Острог]

I would rather a leader get killed by foreign governments, for going against the satanic global order, than live in the USA or UK, where your men fought for the satanic NWO and now their countries are far worse off for "winning" the war.

He essentially said that 'might makes right' which we know to be a fallacy. He essentially called the holy martyrs of Serbia including their King an illegitimate loser because the Ottomans ground them to dust in Kosovo. I will stop here because me continuing would involve a lot of swearing towards that level of 'intellect'.

 

[magoo]

You just described what Germany was before Hitler. It was actually a lot worse before Hitler. Your post is very inaccurate, as many leaders have damaged their own countries much more.

A lot worse before?



I beg to differ.

‘The Russian soldiers raped every German female from eight to 80’

Antony Beevor, author of the acclaimed new book about the fall of Berlin, on a massive war crime committed by the victorious Red Army

www.theguardian.com

‘The Russian soldiers raped every German female from eight to 80’​

Would anyone want to pass what germans endured during WWII with the mustache lunatic? I wouldn´t. It´s almost like children believing a fairy tale. cherryicking what they like and discarting what they don´t. Hitler was a massive faillure. Nobody would want a leader like Hitler. And nobody (at least with a sane mind) would want to live what germans suffered in 30/40 decades.

The cure was worse than the disease. Hitler was a faillure as a leader as a commander. Some of his thoughts were correct. But jews have been studied over and over. Nothing new from Hitler. Mein Kampf was written by a jesuit. So yeah. I think everybody knew about the jewish problem and their sick way of living for centuries. We don´t need Hitler to warn us about jews. It´s almost as if there was no anti jewish literature before.

The solution for jews is make them work for christians and make them convert. Once they almost willingly converted I think. But someone sabotaged. I read something about this a long time ago. In Czech they were going to sign some treaty.

If we are always saying we are going to kill jews I don´t see why aren´t they going to plot against us. They need to convert.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

A lot worse before?

View attachment 21461

I beg to differ.

View attachment 21462

‘The Russian soldiers raped every German female from eight to 80’

Antony Beevor, author of the acclaimed new book about the fall of Berlin, on a massive war crime committed by the victorious Red Army

www.theguardian.com

‘The Russian soldiers raped every German female from eight to 80’​

Would anyone want to pass what germans endured during WWII with the mustache lunatic? I wouldn´t. It´s almost like children believing a fairy tale. cherryicking what they like and discarting what they don´t. Hitler was a massive faillure. Nobody would want a leader like Hitler. And nobody (at least with a sane mind) would want to live what germans suffered in 30/40 decades.

The cure was worse than the disease. Hitler was a faillure as a leader as a commander. Some of his thoughts were correct. But jews have been studied over and over. Nothing new from Hitler. Mein Kampf was written by a jesuit. So yeah. I think everybody knew about the jewish problem and their sick way of living for centuries. We don´t need Hitler to warn us about jews. It´s almost as if there was no anti jewish literature before.

The solution for jews is make them work for christians and make them convert. Once they almost willingly converted I think. But someone sabotaged. I read something about this a long time ago. In Czech they were going to sign some treaty.

If we are always saying we are going to kill jews I don´t see why aren´t they going to plot against us. They need to convert.

Yes, before WW2 there was a civil war, poverty was skyrocketing to the point people had to choose to prostitute their daughters or go hungry, and the number of dead and wounded from WW1 paralyzed the country.

Today, the USA is a disgusting tower of Babel run on sin, and the UK has the same fate with no freedom to even speak against it.

The entire west is worse off, but at least Hitler lead his country to try to fight against it, instead of fighting for it and destroying everything good in the process.

 

[Samseau]

@Australia Sucks yours and others argument boils down to two things:

Hitler lost. 2. Therefore nothing good can be learned from the NS period.
This is postwar liberal moralism that masquerades as analysis. Samseau cannot win a battle of details so he avoids them or just cites wikipedia articles permitted by his talmuds like a normie who is too lazy to look for the truth.

Germany instituted most conscription in 1943 when manpower became desperate but in 1939–1942 the Waffen-SS had hundreds of thousands of foreign volunteers from over 30 nations many of whom had no German blood. Every last one of Spain's Axis fighters were volunteers. They weren’t conscripted or tricked. These men were ideologically motivated, which is not the insult Samseau thinks it is. The Allies never had anything like that. Their fiat money systems survived, but the ideology of Hitler will outlive all their systems even if it was just 1 man who believed in it and not the millions that still do.

The claim that Americans “rushed to sign up” ignores reality. 10.1 million men were conscripted and most of them teenagers. Just read their letters. Half didn’t even know what Europe had to do with them. They didn’t join to fight ‘evil’ they joined because they had no choice. The number of people who were conscripted on the Allied behalf per capita far outweighs those conscripted on the Axis side.

Read the earlier posts where MFTP clearly provided details on Jagerstatter who was executed not for refusing to fight or refusing to "swear an oath" but for encouraging military sedition under wartime law. One man’s emotional post-war "martyrdom" doesn’t prove an entire military system was coercive. But it does reveal how little an uneducated anti-Hitler agitator knows if they think Jagerstatter is some universal example.

Here’s the truth you guys either don't know or refuse to acknowledge, the NS economic system broke free of international finance, rebuilt a destroyed nation, eliminated mass unemployment, stabilized prices, built public works and a quality of life unmatched in Europe. That’s why it had to be destroyed not because it was evil but because it cut out the money powers and worked tremendously. The entire "6 million" mythos is a mockery figure that covers up the occupational recovery of Hitler creating and filling over 6 million jobs for unemployed Germans from Weimar.

Samseau calls this ‘worshipping losers’. Where is worship exactly? It is studying suppressed victories. Because when you actually know history, the fact that Hitler ‘lost’ doesn’t explain why the world is still monetarily enslaved today as it was before his interruption. But his economic model does offer a path forward. He achieved an economic victory between 1933-1945 that no communist country can ever boast of not even the US. No one had that kind of financial freedom since before Waterloo.

Since you guys constantly go back to the red pill, why do those of you who care about winning so much ignore the most obvious red pill of them all here being the economic one? It inspired similar nationalizing and economic attempts by Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, and Gaddafi, all had similar ideologies based on NS, the money powers lied about all of them too.

Also @It_Is_My_Time just curious where is the proof that Hitler was antagonizing America before the war? I looked at MFTP's timeline in this post here: https://christisking.cc/threads/hit...round-of-world-war-two.797/page-12#post-85904

and searched these events.. there is zero antagonizing from Hitler to the US before the war but plenty of hostilities and open smearing of Germany from the US. The only time Hitler verbally attacked the US was his speech on Dec 11th 1941 when he declared war on them, after years of US subversive belligerency against Germany and 6 months of supplying the USSR with lend lease. He talks about what America was doing before the war in heavy details:

This is the kind of delusional thinking which pervades the White Nationalist mind, a fantasy of history instead of what actually happened.

They only concern themselves with, "But Hitler had good ideas!!" and ignore his colossal failure as a military commander.

Once again, like MFTP and every other Hitler apologist and worshipper, instead of focusing on the actual critique you deflect with emotional nonsense.

The actual critique: Hitler was one of the worst military leaders of all time

The response: BUT Muh Weimar! Muh usury!

ZERO responses to the actual criticism; none of the criticism of Hitler has to do with his policies, which weren't that original: Anti-usury comes from the Church, and limiting the powers of Talmudic Jews was done for 1000 years under the Byzantine Empire.

Hitler called Germany the Third Reich for a reason, he was copying Roman/Byzantine ideas almost to the letter. No one here thinks that's a bad idea, what we think was a bad idea was his shit commandeering, and his horrible strategic decisions. All the results of which can been seen around us in the world today.

As Christ said, "Ye shall know them by their fruits," and Hitler was a false prophet who lead his people to their doom. That's the bottom line and no one here can defend it other than defect about Hitler being this cool dude who tried to make his country better while ignoring his trash tier foreign policy.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

 

[NSOE]

Made-up incidents? Even mainstream historical accounts acknowledge the persecution of Germans in Polish-held territories. Dismissing it as a tiny pretext ignores the geopolitical reality that Poland was a strategic piece in the Anglo-French containment strategy against Germany.

Did you read any of his speeches prior to September1st, 1939? There were issues with Poland going back over a year. The massacres didn't start getting bad until March 1939.

Look at these filthy jews who led the groups that murdered thousands of German children.

The shorter answer which explains everything comes first:

From a Polish magazine, google translation:

Spoiler: Translated excerpt

According to German documents found after the war in Berlin by lawyer Alois Glugl and later published by Edmund Osmańczyk, in the summer of 1939, German saboteurs intended to carry out 180 attacks on 223 facilities. The attacks on German property on the Polish-German border were to provide international public opinion with evidence of the provocative behavior of the Polish side and to give Adolf Hitler a propaganda reason to start the war. The intention was to destroy 63 facilities located on the German and Polish sides of the border of East Prussia and in the Pomeranian Voivodeship, 32 in the Free City of Gdańsk, 89 in the Poznań Voivodeship, and 39 in the Silesian Voivodeship and in Zaolzie Silesia. Each building was described in detail and marked on maps. Among the facilities to be blown up or set on fire were, among others: headquarters of German organizations, publishing houses and printing houses owned by Germans, schools belonging to the German minority, German monuments, a pontoon bridge in the Free City of Gdańsk, as well as mills, sawmills, shops, bookstores and farms belonging to famous Volksdeutsche.

Historians have managed to establish, mainly thanks to the research of Karol Marian Pospieszalski, that only a few dozen attacks were included in the plans of the Reichsführer SS. Thanks to the publication of the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs "Dokumente zur Vorgeschichte des Krieges" published in 1939, containing a compilation of official reports on border incidents, it is known that in the last days of August the German police informed the authorities in Berlin about Poles setting fire to German farms located in border towns. All these places were included in the plan of attacks of the Reichsführer SS, so it can be assumed that they were German provocations.

https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/historia/189658,1,piata-kolumna.read

More details/longer version below the divider -

---

I'm not interested in prolonging this discussion, and since I don't want to hang out on the internet long enough to address everything, I'll go back to the two main subjects that caught my attention when I checked this thread out, when it popped up among the newest comments on the right side of the page- the two blatant lies, the alleged massacres of Germans in Poland, and Rydz-Smigly as the personification of Poland's belligerence, the guilty party whose stance precipitated the outbreak of the war.

For now, I'll only address the claims of the massacres of German civilians immediately before the war, as these lies gained some currency and persist contributing to the enormous pile of internet garbage. And as usual, here's waiting for you to again dismiss this information as lies produced by the winners.

In short, the Germans were attacking their people in Poland themselves, and created a task force for that purpose, a voluntary corps populated by Polish born Germans who, not surprisingly, were considered beneath their compatriots back home, tainted to varying degrees by traces of the unavoidable Polonization. Not unlike among mafia types, where the dirty whack jobs are given to the least esteemed, expendable man, whose chances of rising to the top aren't high.

Such a false, preposterous premise defies common sense. Everyone who knows a thing or two about life should be wondering. Poles have not committed any pogroms (like Rusyns/Ukrainians in Volhynia, that's just not our thing, the burning of witches never really caught on either in the same proportions as abroad) even though communist propaganda tried to blame us for some events organized by the communist intelligence in the 1940's and 1950's, like the Kielce "pogrom". Jews, Germans, and the Russian peoples in Poland had it much better than Poles, when the roles had been reversed for more than 100 years, before World War I.

Those were all imaginary crimes, but these gallant volunteers, called the Volksdeutscher Selbstschutz, were later used to commit real mass murder against Polish civilians, in general in those same areas where these fake killings of Germans were said to have occurred. For example, here is the timeline of all of their activities, and here their crimes in Pomerania are listed.


Now back to those made up massacres of Germans- below is the relevant information I located:


This campaign, codenamed Operation Himmler, is described in detail on the Polish wiki- here's the translated link.


Also mentioned, along with other hostile events, on the website of a trade school in the Warmia region (fka Eastern Prussia):

Spoiler: German sabotage in 1939

In 1939, many sabotage actions took place in Poland, inspired by the German secret services.

On April 28, 1939, the Third Reich terminated the Polish-German non-aggression pact. The natural effect of this situation was to aggravate relations between Poles and the German minority living in the Republic. There were both anti-Polish and anti-German demonstrations. Additionally, German secret services conducted activities aimed at spreading unrest and provoking provocations. They were to present the German troops' attack on Poland as a campaign of retaliation against a series of aggressions on the Polish side, which would justify it in the eyes of international public opinion. In Germany, a secret cell was established to coordinate the activities of the German minority in Poland, called the so-called Committee of Six. Already in the spring of 1939, Polish counterintelligence arrested several dozen people on charges of espionage for Germany.

In the summer, there were a number of attacks on Polish border posts, railway stations and industrial facilities in the border zone. Saboteurs from Germany placed bombs in facilities belonging to the German minority, including German schools. Terrorist attacks also occurred deep in Polish territory. At the end of August, a member of the German national minority from Bielsko placed two suitcases loaded with explosives in the railway station in Tarnów. Twenty people died in the explosion, and one third of the station building was destroyed. The number of victims could have been higher, as a transport of Polish soldiers left the station a few minutes before the explosion, and the train from Kraków was late in arriving.

On the eve of the outbreak of World War II, the Third Reich's security services carried out a series of provocations as part of Operation Himmler. The most famous of these was the Gliwice provocation. Before the war, Gliwice belonged to Germany territorially. On August 31, 1939, a seven-person group of Germans posing as Poles broke into the building of the local radio station. One of the attackers began reading a previously prepared message, but after a few words the radio fell silent for unknown reasons. The provocation turned out to be an embarrassment for the organizers. However, this did not hinder German propaganda. Two hours after the "attack", all transmitters of the Deutschlandsender radio station broadcast extensive information about "Polish provocations".

Part of the German sabotage operations aimed to seize strategically important objects. An example of such an operation is the so-called Jabłonków incident. In the vicinity of the town of Mosty near Jabłonków there was a three-hundred-meter railway tunnel, which was one of the most important communication passages through the main ridge of the Carpathians. Its capture by the Germans could have ensured a quick transfer of troops to Polish territory. To avoid this, the Poles mined the tunnel. According to the original German plans, the aggression against Poland was to begin in the morning of August 26, 1939. The attack was called off at the last minute by Adolf Hitler, who was afraid of the consequences of the Polish-British alliance. The order to change the date of the attack did not reach the group of saboteurs, who set off in the evening to take over the object. The Polish personnel of the tunnel did not allow themselves to be surprised and held their positions.

A dozen or so minutes before the German invasion began, a sabotage group tried to seize the bridges in Tczew, where the railway line from the Reich to East Prussia ran. The Germans intercepted two Polish steam locomotives on the border and sent a train with an assault group as a planned transit train. The operation ended in failure thanks to Polish railway workers who directed the approaching train onto a dead end. Polish sappers blew up the bridges and the Germans had no convenient connection with Prussia until the construction of a new bridge was completed in 1940.

Since the first aggression of the Third Reich against Poland, some members of the German minority organized numerous sabotage actions against Polish soldiers. Parachutists also carried out such actions. Telephone lines were cut en masse, railway tracks were sabotaged, and disinformation was spread. The saboteurs often appeared in Polish uniforms. Units of the sabotage Freikorps Ebbinghaus attempted to occupy some Silesian cities. The German so-called fifth gathered intelligence information, including on the location of the Polish highest authorities.

On September 3, retreating Polish troops were fired upon from several locations in Bydgoszcz. A fight broke out, and the army began to catch saboteurs. Several hundred suspects were detained. In accordance with the martial law, people in civilian clothes who possessed weapons were shot. In the heat of the moment, innocent Germans were also murdered. After several hours, the situation seemed under control, but the attacks on Polish troops were repeated at night and the next day. This time, soldiers shot all suspects on the spot. On September 5, Wehrmacht troops entered the city. Several hundred Poles were shot in the first week of the occupation of Bydgoszcz. By the end of 1939, about five thousand residents of Bydgoszcz and the Bydgoszcz district had died in executions. The events of September 3 and 4, under the name "Bromberger Blutsonntag" (Bydgoszcz Bloody Sunday), were used by the propaganda of the Third Reich.

Thanks to the denunciations of some of the German minority living in the pre-war Polish Republic, many Poles were found on the so-called list of enemies of the Reich. This data was used in the elimination of Polish intelligentsia, members of local authorities, political activists, war veterans, declared patriots, representatives of the world of culture and science, conducted from the first day of the war.


https://ckziumragowo.pl/historia/Dywersja-niemiecka-1939