Hitler versus Rothschild: the Logistics and Background of World War Two

No idea why you respect this Matt Johnson so much. He is very clearly confused. He starts off the post with true info, then ends with a non-sequitur.



If Britain was to blame, why did Tsar Nick ally with them in WW1? Matt unintentionally labels Nick as a fool, which is true.
Because he's a vetted academic and has a wide archive of lectures. I respect him hell of a lot more than suspected fed Samsu who has no verifiable legitimacy.
 
Because he's a vetted academic and has a wide archive of lectures. I respect him hell of a lot more than fed Samsu who has no verifiable legitimacy.

It doesn't take very many credentials to impress you now does it? Lots of trash schools out there, being an academic means nothing.

My cred in real life is extremely high, not that I need them, because it's logic and reason that counts.

Note you cannot answer my objection (and haven't for the vast majority already in this thread).
 


"I've got to wake up at 4!"

Games Lol GIF by Eternal Family
 
My cred in real life is extremely high, not that I need them, because it's logic and reason that counts
What an un-Orthodox statement. This logic and reason has brought you to a point where you hold in a lower regard a divinely appointed Orthodox Christian monarch who died a holy martyr's death than Trump who lives outside of The Church, presides over a Masonic country, publicly prays with members of Synagogue of Satan and does their bidding every step of the way. You are a seriously, seriously confused individual.

a4f9cac7b4d180e6dab510b9e5447b92.jpg
Yeah, I remember even that.
 
Last edited:
What an un-Orthodox statement. This logic and reason has brought you to a point where you hold in a lower regard a divinely appointed Orthodox Christian monarch who died a holy martyr's death than Trump who lives outside of The Church, presides over a Masonic country, publicly prays with members of Synagogue of Satan and does their bidding every step of the way. You are a seriously, seriously confused individual.

View attachment 22373
Yeah, I remember even that.
Further reading on the subject (which Samsu should do to get rid of the bogus notion that Nicolas II was somehow a bad monarch):


Was Ivan the Terrible Really a “Mad Butcher?” • Wasn't Emperor Paul a “monster?” • Was Tsarist rule completely “unlimited?” • Was the peasantry under serfdom oppressed? • Who financed the Bolsheviks? • Did the Tsars really represent the Russian people? • Where did Russian Liberalism actually come from? Just in time for the 300th anniversary of Petrograd, a new book on pre-Bolshevik Russian history has been published in English. It is a defense of royalism from Kievan Rus' until the abdication of Tsar Martyr Nicholas II at the end of World War I. For English speaking readers, it is the only published account of Tsarist Russia that succeeds in demolishing the arguments of the kept Anglo-American historians on the “evils” and “tyranny” of the Tsarist government. This work is a concise defense of Tsarism and the notion of Orthodox Russia. Just after the “History Channel's” hatchet job on the Romanovs recently ran on American television, referring to the Tsars as “butchers” and “tyrants,” this new book could not be more useful.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top