Hitler versus Rothschild: the Logistics and Background of World War Two

Sure it is, which is why you've not presented it nor is it presented anywhere in the description.

"Just listen to my 30/60/120 min podcast brah, then you'll know!"

Btw the podcast link doesn't work for me, I'm using brave, and not interested in switching browsers.
What a lame ass excuse. As I said, you're no match with dr. Johnson academically so you can shite post all you want, I'm not buying it. My post is not for you and I won't waste my time creating walls of text like MFTP so that a guy I've never met thinks this or that, I don't care what you think, it's for others who want to learn instead of agenda pushers like you.
 
Last edited:
What a lame ass excuse. As I said, you're no match with dr. Johnson academically so you can shite post all you want, I'm not buying it. My post is not for you and I won't waste my time creating walls of text like MFTP so that a guy I've never met thinks this or that, I don't care what you think, it's for others who want to learn instead of agenda pushers like you.
The links don't work for me either, I don't know if it's the browser or not, I also use brave. Shame, because I 'd listen to the podcast.
 
The links don't work for me either, I don't know if it's the browser or not, I also use brave. Shame, because I 'd listen to the podcast.
That's the official page, you need to try a different browser but it works for me in Brave too. Maybe try a VPN, the site has been banned in places. Or try looking on YT, a guy has mirrored selected few and here it is.

 
Last edited:
Samseau, not to target you but now I feel compelled to also respond. Your posts tend to hold some weight although a person is left wondering if it's worth believing in what's being said. It's fine to sit in the peanut gallery and take pot shots at men in history far greater than yourself. I say out of concern which cannot be conveyed in writing: do you think it's time to speak to your priest about pride? There is an air of yourself being Orthodox and an administrator making you privy to a higher understanding.

1748076180829.png
 
Last edited:
Trump is most likely not going to save America. He may not even save himself. He is, however, useful for Christians and will mitigate a lot of damage from Talmudic Jews. He will help Whites by extension. He is a big speed bump against the Reform Jews ruling and destroying this world.

I don't see Trump as someone to emulate, nor do I see him as infallable. He's just the best choice in a rotten system. This is what most Trump supporters believe, by the way.
I agree to that but factoring in the realities of 30's Germany Hitler was the exact same thing. And it's not Hitler who wiped out Germany but talmudic Allies and Soviets. He 'started' WW2 just like Putin attacked Ukraine. He merely forestalled the invasion of Stalin. You cannot also speak about Trump in certain terms because he lives in the present and his actions are yet to occur. Your opinion on the war with China is as good as mine. Pete's sources say an 'event' involving Taiwan and US is being prepared for autumn. What else is going to happen in October? Oh yes, the digital Euro. And we have the WHO plandemic treaty ratified. Things are converging too much to be just idle talk.
 
Last edited:
And it's not Hitler who wiped out Germany but talmudic Allies and Soviets. He 'started' WW2 just like Putin attacked Ukraine. He merely forestalled the invasion of Stalin.

Yet unlike the moron Hitler, Putin has played his cards close to his chest. He has not squandered his nation in foolish, all-or-nothing offensives that leave his people totally exposed. Despite the fact that Europe is planning to invade Russia again, Putin is not using this as a pretext to launch a massive invasion into Europe, because Putin is a smart man who knows the defender has the advantage.

Putin is a winner. Hitler was a loser. The two men were in similar circumstances but one completely outclasses the other both in terms of strategy and spirituality. Putin is an observant Orthodox, what did Hitler do for the Church?
 
Yet unlike the moron Hitler, Putin has played his cards close to his chest. He has not squandered his nation in foolish, all-or-nothing offensives that leave his people totally exposed. Despite the fact that Europe is planning to invade Russia again, Putin is not using this as a pretext to launch a massive invasion into Europe, because Putin is a smart man who knows the defender has the advantage.

Putin is a winner. Hitler was a loser. The two men were in similar circumstances but one completely outclasses the other both in terms of strategy and spirituality. Putin is an observant Orthodox, what did Hitler do for the Church?
You're strawmanning the argument with a moronically myopic missassumption on your part that you desperately try to stick on the man. Germany could never win that war for one reason alone - lack of natural resources. Germany doesn't sit on everything that's needed to reliably power the military but Russia does. This is why it was a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' situation. If he did nothing Germany would've been torn to shreds like Tsarist Russia. The Bavarian bolshevik revolution would've spilled over the whole Reich. Fuhrer Samsu would just let his nation be eaten by wolves.

Putin is an observant Orthodox, what did Hitler do for the Church?
Respected Mt. Athos and left it intact. You're plain dishonest.

Besides, you started an offtopic discussion in a thread that is not meant for it.
 
Last edited:
You're strawmanning the argument with a moronically myopic missassumption on your part that you desperately try to stick on the man. Germany could never win that war for one reason alone - lack of natural resources. Germany doesn't sit on everything that's needed to reliably power the military but Russia does. This is why it was a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' situation. If he did nothing Germany would've been torn to shreds like Tsarist Russia. The Bavarian bolshevik revolution would've spilled over the whole Reich. Fuhrer Samsu would just let his nation be eaten by wolves.
The prolificity of Dr. Johnson is really something else. He must be reading my mind.


In the first few minutes we get a statement of who the moron here is.

Listen Samsu, I get what you are doing here and I agree, no future battles will be won under these banners and I see how someone would not want this idea to propagate across the forum. What I'm concerned about is truth above anything else and the way you try to sway the discourse with skewing facts and producing alternative history is a disservice to the intellect of the men here who are more than able to come up with healthy conclusions themselves. Don't do it, it works against you and is not the proper method.
 
The prolificity of Dr. Johnson is really something else. He must be reading my mind.


In the first few minutes we get a statement of who the moron here is.

Listen Samsu, I get what you are doing here and I agree, no future battles will be won under these banners and I see how someone would not want this idea to propagate across the forum. What I'm concerned about is truth above anything else and the way you try to sway the discourse with skewing facts and producing alternative history is a disservice to the intellect of the men here who are more than able to come up with healthy conclusions themselves. Don't do it, it works against you and is not the proper method.

I am at a loss of what a podcast about the Lokot Republic has to do with this thread. That Nationalist Socialist ideas can work economically has never been disputed by me. Every single one of my criticisms has to do with Hitler's cult-like obsession with amassing power and his disastrous military campaign afterwards.
 
Germany could never win that war for one reason alone - lack of natural resources. Germany doesn't sit on everything that's needed to reliably power the military but Russia does. This is why it was a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' situation. If he did nothing Germany would've been torn to shreds like Tsarist Russia. The Bavarian bolshevik revolution would've spilled over the whole Reich. Fuhrer Samsu would just let his nation be eaten by wolves.

Germany had plenty of access to resources through America. Germany only needed to play it cool after the 1933 Jewish boycott, and focus on trade with America. 1/3 of America was ethnically German and did not care at all about European politics, but was actually sympathetic to Germany.

If Soviet Russia had invaded Poland, but Germany did not, then France and England would have been obligated to go to war with the USSR due to their defensive pact with Poland. If the USSR marched all the way up to the German border, then Germany would have an excellent pretext to counter-attack without fearing reprisal from England and France. More importantly, it would have kept America on Germany's side.

America was the wild-card in WW2 and Hitler arrogantly dismissed it. It made no sense and Germany could have easily kept America neutral by keeping the moral high ground at the start of the war. If the USSR invaded Poland and pushed up to German borders, America would have never supported the USSR, nor would they have been able to mobilize a draft against Germany, and the isolationists that were opposed to FDR would have won the culture war in America.

Additionally, had Japan refused to attack the USSR at the Eastern front, then Hitler should have broken the alliance and cited noncompliance from the Japanese. If Germany had broken away from Japan this also would have been very popular with Americans. Keeping America out of the war would have easily allowed Germany to win. It was the material support that saved the USSR and Germany could have easily kept open trade channels with America for any resources they needed.

That Hitler never implemented such commonsense strategies showed his lack of ability and understanding of the world at that time. His neglect of America was especially foolish.
 
If Soviet Russia had invaded Poland, but Germany did not, then France and England would have been obligated to go to war with the USSR due to their defensive pact with Poland. If the USSR marched all the way up to the German border, then Germany would have an excellent pretext to counter-attack without fearing reprisal from England and France. More importantly, it would have kept America on Germany's side.

America was the wild-card in WW2 and Hitler arrogantly dismissed it. It made no sense and Germany could have easily kept America neutral by keeping the moral high ground at the start of the war. If the USSR invaded Poland and pushed up to German borders, America would have never supported the USSR, nor would they have been able to mobilize a draft against Germany, and the isolationists that were opposed to FDR would have won the culture war in America.
See, this is what I'm talking about, this is naive, high school textbook level historicism. Like the textbook you're omitting the jewish influence in all of this which is key. England, US and France would NEVER attack USSR, they supported bolsheviks and Stalin! This is just Samsu's joyful day dreaming. This is so stupid I'm not going to waste my time bickering with you like MFTP. You'd have to get a grip first. Instead I'll hotlink another podcast to blow you out of the water or rather give the men who read this something to chew on because I don't care what you think, you're a fraud.

 
Last edited:
England, US and France would NEVER attack USSR, they supported bolsheviks and Stalin!

Only to the degree they could not publicly look like they were supporting Stalin. Stalin was not a popular figure and public perception greatly mattered, especially in America. America still had a legit democracy and rigging national elections in those days was next to impossible.

It's okay if you have no arguments, but everyone can see you're just a partisan ideologue who isn't interested in any serious discussion. MFTP would also talk in circles while avoiding my main points.

If you understand a topic material well then you can discuss it succinctly. This is true in every subject. Details can always be engaged more on a specific point if necessary. But like MFTP you cannot discuss the subject without a link to a blog, no link in particular within the blog, which indicates you're operating on emotion and not reason.

The fact of the matter is that the isolationist movement was very strong in America during the 1930's, as WW1 had been extraordinarily unpopular. The Bonus Army and the aftermath meant that no one, from either D or R party, could be pro-war without getting crushed in an election.


That Hitler did not encourage this movement and advance trade with the USA is mind-boggling, and it shows, much like Japan, that there was a severe underestimation of the capabilities of America.

Instead Hitler deliberately antagonized Americans, declared them ideological enemies in the 1930's, and was dismissive towards America because it was a democracy. Instead of being an intelligent diplomat, Hitler gave his enemies endless ammunition to sway public opinion against Germany. Hitler made enemies with America for no reason even though America could have easily stayed neutral.
 
Last edited:
I'm not on this forum to write essays to win an argument with a person I've never met. There is no need for me to do what much more knowledgeable men are already doing on a daily basis (hence the podcast). And to be honest life taught me to value my time more than internet forums because it's limited thus posting here is pretty low on my food chain. I can be banned off here and frankly Scarlett, I wouldn't give a damn. Take it whichever way you want, what I'm interested in is you debunking M20C guys or dr. Johnson because that is where the weight lies. You can win an argument in this sandbox but fail miserably against honest intellectuals who punch above anyone present here.
 
Last edited:
Only to the degree they could not publicly look like they were supporting Stalin. Stalin was not a popular figure and public perception greatly mattered, especially in America. America still had a legit democracy and rigging national elections in those days was next to impossible.

It's okay if you have no arguments, but everyone can see you're just a partisan ideologue who isn't interested in any serious discussion. MFTP would also talk in circles while avoiding my main points.

If you understand a topic material well then you can discuss it succinctly. This is true in every subject. Details can always be engaged more on a specific point if necessary. But like MFTP you cannot discuss the subject without a link to a blog, no link in particular within the blog, which indicates you're operating on emotion and not reason.

The fact of the matter is that the isolationist movement was very strong in America during the 1930's, as WW1 had been extraordinarily unpopular. The Bonus Army and the aftermath meant that no one, from either D or R party, could be pro-war without getting crushed in an election.


That Hitler did not encourage this movement and advance trade with the USA is mind-boggling, and it shows, much like Japan, that there was a severe underestimation of the capabilities of America.

Instead Hitler deliberately antagonized Americans, declared them ideological enemies in the 1930's, and was dismissive towards America because it was a democracy. Instead of being an intelligent diplomat, Hitler gave his enemies endless ammunition to sway public opinion against Germany. Hitler made enemies with America for no reason even though America could have easily stayed neutral.
Hitler was dismissive of the USA, prior to WW2 for many reasons, though he does point out what a joke "democracy" was back then, the same as it is today. The "democracy" of the USA in the 1930's is the same as today. Controlled by Wall Street, and both candidates are puppets, so it doesn't matter who wins, Wall Street still wins.

He was dismissive of the USA, because the same communist bankers he defeated already completely controlled the USA, complete with their puppet FDR. That Americans just did as told, suffered through a depression despite having unlimited resources, while Germany prospered. The USA govt. was then using its wealth, which there was little due to the depression, to build up Stalin's military in a plan to attack Germany. While USA tax money was being wasted to kill millions of innocent Christians all across Eastern Europe and thousands of churches were being burned down, Hitler reached out to England, France and the USA for peaceful negations to take on Stalin.

The fact the USA helped build up the USSR, while the USSR was killing millions of Christians and burning down churches is enough to make any reasonable Christian untrusting of the Americans and the reason many German soldiers referred to the USA troops as "Godless Americans".

Hitler's mistake was not in respecting the satanic USA, it was in not waiting to go to war until their technology was so advanced that they could not be defeated. Had they waited a year or two and advanced what they were working on, they likely would have won the war. Hitler admitted this mistake to Von Braun in their last communication.


-1933 Germany faced a jewish-led global boycott before Hitler did anything (march 23-24).

-1934 Hollywood (run by jews Mayer, Goldwyn, Warner) was pumping out anti-German films like The House of Rothschild. Germany formally protested the US laughed it off.

-1936 FDR's re-election campaign openly cast Hitler as a global menace before any hostilities before Anschluss or Poland.-FDR’s inner circle (Morgenthau, Frankfurter, Baruch, Brandeis) were fanatically anti-German. Hitler still held back, he kept a neutral tone on America until late 1941.

-The US refused fair trade. Germany offered barter arrangements to avoid Wall Street debt traps; Cordell Hull and FDR’s clique slammed the door.

-FDR never replaced Ambassador William Dodd after he left Berlin in 1937. That’s a diplomatic snub of the highest order basically saying, "You’re not a legitimate government."

-Then in the 1937 Chicago “Quarantine” speech, Roosevelt called Hitler a gangster years before war. Not provoked, just hostile.
 
Last edited:
Hitler was no megalomaniac cult leader as the usual lies claim. He was the figurehead of a cause that millions across Europe and beyond voluntarily embraced to defend their homelands and resist Bolshevik tyranny. The Waffen-SS alone drew hundreds of thousands from many nations even winning the loyalty of entire Soviet units who defected to fight under Germay's banner.

Meanwhile the Allies relied heavily on forced conscription drafting tens of millions of unwilling men into a war they neither wanted nor understood. The American draft alone pulled over 10 million young men into a conflict manufactured by FDR’s warmongering agenda.

British troops fought under warmongering alcoholic Churchill whose reckless bloodlust drove millions of young men into needless carnage to serve imperial ambitions only to lose it all. Soviet soldiers were expendable cannon fodder for Stalin’s brutal regime where human life meant nothing and millions were sacrificed in endless “meat grinder” offensives, following the grim logic of “we have more bodies than they have bullets.” No one would take an "oath" to Stalin because no one wanted to, he had zero personality or charm and inspired nobody.

This is the real difference. A majority of the Axis soldiers fought as free men by choice united by conviction and identity. Allied soldiers were slaves to their governments’ ambitions swept up in a war driven by propaganda and manipulation.

So when you hear the tired claims about Hitler’s “personality cult” or “lack of vision,” remember those are excuses from people who can’t explain without lying how millions freely rallied behind him while the Allies resorted to coercion and control. The Axis cause was powerfully real, unlike the manufactured loyalty on the other side
 
Back
Top