He needs to go with an attack dog for VP like Matt Gaetz or Thomas Massey. Someone that would carry the torch if they had to fill the presidency, and someone the uniparty would think is as bad as Trump.
That's why Vance is good. Gaetz would be my preference. But won't happenHe needs to go with an attack dog for VP like Matt Gaetz or Thomas Massey. Someone that would carry the torch if they had to fill the presidency, and someone the uniparty would think is as bad as Trump.
That deserves the eye-popping angry merchant or the Shut it Down meme. Massey just won Primary against an AIPAC RINO, taking their win rate down to 97.9% or so.He needs to go with an attack dog for VP like Matt Gaetz or Thomas M.assey Someone that would carry the torch if they had to fill the presidency, and someone the uniparty would think is as bad as Trump.
Ramaswamy! It's funny that people will post things like this and ignore him hard because of identity politics but won't come up with legitimate criticisms. He's likely one of the smartest people we can have in politics.
Trump's VP pick will tell us a lot both about how much he's learned from his mistakes while in office, and how he intends to govern in his second term. Unfortunately, most of these picks do not inspire much confidence. Cotton, Rubio, Stefanik and Scott are all complete GOP hacks and Israel stooges. Trump would literally be setting himself up for impeachment and/or worse by picking any one of them. Ben Carson, Doug Burgum and J.D. Vance would be better MAGA picks, but all three are fairly untested, and both Burgum and Carson are of an age (67 and 72, respectively) where neither could be counted upon to carry the torch and act as Trump's heir-apparent to the MAGA movement in 2028. Vance is only 39 and has a lot of upside potential, but there are questions about how deeply held his MAGA/America First principles really are. But of the limited options presented in this shortlist, he would be my preferred pick.
Curious what the resident Trump diehards think.
I only ignored him because if you read the article you'll see that Trump has apparently already eliminated Vivek from consideration as VP, but has instead decided to give him a cabinet position (if that's true, they obviously talked and came to some agreement). But I would personally prefer Vivek as VP over any of the other listed candidates, as I think he has the most overall upside both ideologically and strategically. But Trump clearly has his own criteria for who he wants to pick.Ramaswamy! It's funny that people will post things like this and ignore him hard because of identity politics but won't come up with legitimate criticisms. He's likely one of the smartest people we can have in politics.
I'd argue that, assuming there's no good proof of him being a trojan horse, he's a strong pick because it's an insurance policy. If the #2 coming up is the guy who has been most vocal about dismantling the security state and demonstrates a strong understanding of how the opposition work (IMHO he's the only candidate that showed he understands socialist dogma), then killing off or imprisoning Trump means you've just massively empowered another threat.I only ignored him because if you read the article you'll see that Trump has apparently already eliminated Vivek from consideration as VP, but has instead decided to give him a cabinet position (if that's true, they obviously talked and came to some agreement). But I would personally prefer Vivek as VP over any of the other listed candidates, as I think he has the most overall upside both ideologically and strategically. But Trump clearly has his own criteria for who he wants to pick.
You think that no Church Father ever called anyone a wretched pig or a whore? If my memory serves me well Fr. Peter Heers gave this example.With all that constant swearing and cussing in all of his articles ?
You think that no Church Father ever called anyone a wretched pig or a whore? If my memory serves me well Fr. Peter Heers gave this example.
I do see your point. Pre Trump your choices were jingoistic neo-cons who’d slop the Israeli knob. They were also pro deep state. Remember “what’s wrong, got something to hide?” If you were against these guys you were driven into the arms of a bunch of feminists. Trump did what many a third party tried, but could never do. Run and win in an alternative platform. He basically had to highjack the RNC to do it. Unless someone was asleep at the wheel the mainline RNC must have found him useful.Pre-Trump, it was still "racist" to talk about open borders. Does anyone remember how pathetically blue-pill American society was before Trump?
They are going to kill him
They are going to kill him
The Bible is pretty good at calling out the wicked using strong language. Alex is just letting off steam by cussing, and not being tempted to threaten violence, which is all the FEDS would need to shut him down.You think that no Church Father ever called anyone a wretched pig or a whore? If my memory serves me well Fr. Peter Heers gave this example.
He also mentioned that he would release JFK files in 2016, and didn't deliver.
As well, most of these documents are purple pilled at best, or "limited hangouts". They are written by deep state bureaucrats.
Granted that's still better than Biden but I wouldn't raise my expectations here.