A Ponzi is a scheme whereby investors are paid a phony return with the money from new investors. As you yourself continue to state: Bitcoin has no return. Under your definition, Gold is a Ponzi scheme.
Bernie Madoff's fund was a Ponzi. Social Security is a ponzi. Government bonds are a ponzi. Bitcoin by definition cannot be a ponzi, because there is no yeild.
I should have used different terminology. More accurately, Bitcoin is a "greater fool" asset or a type of pyramid scheme, since it can only produce a return for its owner by being sold for more than the initial purchase price. Gold, at the very least, can be melted down for jewelry, or simply used as the world's most expensive doorstop, since, you know,
it actually exists in physical form
. Conversely, Bitcoin provides zero utility to its owner except the hope for being sold for a higher price at a future date.
People who buy $70k Bitcoin today will sell at $200k.
For every seller, there is a buyer, and vice versa.
What is the guy who bought at $200k going to sell it for? And what is the guy who buys from
him going to sell it for? Eventually you run out of buyers at these increasing price points, and you get a crash. So no, there is not a seller for every buyer and vice versa.
Ok, at least you sort of answered the question I posed 5 times, after saying it was a bad faith "gotcha". How is answering a question a gotcha? You are projecting, since I'm not accusing you of anything (your analogy of the beating question is an accusation). You don't look at this topic dispassionately, which is what I have shown, or you would answer. I'm assuming "I will never be wrong about BTC" is the answer. Just be a man and say it; it's fine since it's clear that's what your answer is.
But you're not asking that question because you're interested in my response, you're asking it because it's a rhetorical trick that Bitcoiners throw around to silence debate. Imagine if I just kept asking you like a broken record, "HEY BLADE RUNNER, WHAT WILL MAKE YOU ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG ABOUT BITCOIN?"
How are you supposed to answer that?
"If it crashes again?" (No)
"If the government cracks down hard on it?" (No)
"If the network is compromised in some manner?" (No)
The point is that there is no way I can get you to answer this question, because ultimately your belief in Bitcoin is irrational and faith-based. Even if Bitcoin dropped down to 1 cent and mining was punishable by the death penalty, you and chance vought would come here and say that you'd still buy Bitcoin because you believe in it. Similarly, I
believe that Bitcoin is ultimately worthless and not worth investing in. The difference is that my position is not based on faith and delusion, it's based on the incontrovertible fact that Bitcoin is a greater fool asset by its very design, and that eventually you will run out of buyers for it as the price increases, causing a massive crash as everyone stampedes for the exits simultaneously.
But since it's a silly question, I'll give you an equally silly answer: when BTC is the world reserve currency and I can pay my taxes in it, I'll be a believer that you were right all along.
Let's say BTC isn't what chance or myself claim it is. Ok. But all it does is go up and to the right for decades, while you wait for it to crash to zero. At what point wouldn't you want to have 1000x gain, or 100x gains, or even 10x gains if you recognized something for at LEAST monetary value, even valued in fiat?
Are you seriously predicting a 10x anytime soon? Much less a 100x or a 1000x? Really???
I mean, I guess if that's what you
honestly believe then your zealous pro-BTC position makes sense. But I think you're straight up delusional in that case. It's pure wishful thinking. All the big money has already been made in Bitcoin. You and chance vought are both
very late to the party if you think you'll be making lifechanging money by HODLing.