Scott Ritter is doing a great Indepth live talk with Larry Johnson and Danny Haiphong. So far the points in the talk...
Ukraine is finished, they can't even defend themselves. Putin wants unconventional surrender and Ukraine will not give it, so Russia likely will go on the offense this summer when they are fully prepared to take it to Ukraine and finish them off. They are training soldiers now for these new tactics.
Israels' efforts are embarrassing. Their military tactics seen on video are terrible. They are inexperienced and way too young for their ranks due to conscription. Ritter went as far as to say Israel is probably finished as a country and he wished when they all try to leave they were forced to stay and face the Palestinians for the crimes they committed.
The USA is pretty much helpless, other than just dropping bombs, which does us no good if Hezbollah invades Israel. Our military equipment performed so badly in Ukraine we know we have no real chance. The support for a new war is simply not there, and no one will support it in the west.
Add to this, the economy in Russia is doing good, things are being built, while everything in the west is collapsing and falling apart.
Ritter says there is good reason to believe that Iran has developed underwater drones and if so, they likely have given it their proxies and our air craft carriers are nearly unable to defend themselves against them, which is why we are staying out so far.
Ritter also said that the Iraqi army would be able to hold off the US... So dont put all your eggs in one pervert basket with that dude.
He's good on some things... But often overstates things.
Your last sentence might make sense if it wasnt true that ..He also literally fell for the same thing twice and is on video exposing himself to someone he supposed was 15.Ritter has been spot on on Ukraine. He's a bit too optimistic about the prospects of Gaza militants, a bit of a cheerleader, however a lot of what he is reporting on Israeli losses seems to be true. He's a lot closer to the truth than your average pundit.
He was also targeted by the feds and set up.
Ritter is a full time bullsh*tter and perv to boot. A man in his late 40s showing off his private parts online to what he thought were 14-15 year olds. Got caught twice in the span of 8 years (2001-2009). That basically means he's been a predator for nearly a decade.Your last sentence might make sense if it wasnt true that ..He also literally fell for the same thing twice and is on video exposing himself to someone he supposed was 15.
Don't make excuses for the guy.
I'm a Marine, I want to give him a benefits of the doubt... But as a father and a man of integrity..
He's a pervert.
Eta...
You see stuff like this all the time in corporate and higher echelon military leaders.
People have something wrong with their soul/body or what I call ...Corpus.
These people self sabotage.
Ritter is a self sabotage expert clearly.... 1st time maybe it's a set up... 2x? Come on....
In the documentary, Ritter repeated his charge that the United States used UNSCOM to spy on Iraq. He also accused the United States of manipulating UNSCOM to provoke a confrontation with Saddam Hussein as a pretext for U.S. air strikes on Iraq.
Second this. I saw Ritter attract a several thousand strong "Don't invade Iraq!" protest crowd at Cal Tech in late 2001 (they actually brought speakers outside for overflow crowd) and you could tell he was loving the attention (and the money at $20 a ticket). I'm skeptical of people who seek any form of public recognition or fame. Not to mention, he has been wrong on the US's "imminent" invasion of Iran for over 20 years now. Doesn't surprise me that he wound up in pedo trouble. Whether he was framed or not, anyone who risks their life simply for the pleasure of being able to run their mouth in public has an addiction problem (an addiction to attention), and addicts can never be relied upon, much less trusted.Ritter also said that the Iraqi army would be able to hold off the US... So dont put all your eggs in one pervert basket with that dude.
He's good on some things... But often overstates things.
If you find anyone better on the Middle East situation, let us know. TBH, you just described every politician in the USA.Second this. I saw Ritter attract a several thousand strong "Don't invade Iraq!" protest crowd at Cal Tech in late 2001 (they actually brought speakers outside for overflow crowd) and you could tell he was loving the attention (and the money at $20 a ticket). I'm skeptical of people who seek any form of public recognition or fame. Not to mention, he has been wrong on the US's "imminent" invasion of Iran for over 20 years now. Doesn't surprise me that he wound up in pedo trouble. Whether he was framed or not, anyone who risks their life simply for the pleasure of being able to run their mouth in public has an addiction problem (an addiction to attention), and addicts can never be relied upon, much less trusted.
“More journalists have been killed in the first 10 weeks of the Israel-Gaza war than have ever been killed in a single country over an entire year,” it said.
“CPJ is particularly concerned about an apparent pattern of targeting of journalists and their families by the Israeli military.
The CPJ said there was a “pattern of journalists in Gaza reporting receiving threats, and subsequently, their family members being killed”. It said the 90-year-old father of the Al-Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif was killed by an Israeli airstrike on his home after multiple threats were made to his son.
That is fair... Ritters tract record has been so so...and it's not that hard to debunk his claims.Can we stop with all the ad hominem on Scott Ritter? Debunk his arguments, but uncited critques of his calls 2 decades ago when he was a twentysomething or his personal degeneracy have nothing to do with the truth of statements he makes.
Gay Jewish homosexual Glenn Greenwald is one of the best English language journalists today.
Kevin Spacey despite (I guess?) being a pervert is an outstanding actor.
Nick Fuentes hangs out with weird furry fanatics.
Alex Jones married a Jewess.
And you know who was doing stuff we all universally reject 20 years ago? I'll give you a hint. He's the reason every one of you are here.
Drama, gossip, whatever, it's boring snarky, and feminine.
Hypocrisy, such as attacking Elliot Spitzer for zealously prosecuting politicians for paying for sex, when he was doing the very same thing himself is one thing. But otherwise all the drama and opinion about a man's personal life or whether you, as an anonymous internet poster "like" someone you've never met before is below the level of serious discourse.
You guys are gonna make me quote a feminist again.
Great Minds Discuss Ideas. Average Minds Discuss Events. Small Minds Discuss People.
At least try to stick with the middle one.
What is going on here? How did Scott Ritter go from being the darling hero of the atheist far left in 2001 to having so many die hard conservative Christian men fanboying over him in 2024 (same goes for Glen Greenwald)? Weird. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. This proves my point about fame and those who seek it. Snap out of it boys! A pedophile has you under his fame-spell. Next you'll be gleefully passing out thumbs downs for those who call Noam Chomsky a misinformed, controlled-op jew.Can we stop with all the ad hominem on Scott Ritter? Debunk his arguments, but uncited critques of his calls 2 decades ago when he was a twentysomething or his personal degeneracy have nothing to do with the truth of statements he makes.
Gay Jewish homosexual Glenn Greenwald is one of the best English language journalists today.
Kevin Spacey despite (I guess?) being a pervert is an outstanding actor.
Nick Fuentes hangs out with weird furry fanatics.
Alex Jones married a Jewess.
And you know who was doing stuff we all universally reject 20 years ago? I'll give you a hint. He's the reason every one of you are here.
Drama, gossip, whatever, it's boring snarky, and feminine.
Hypocrisy, such as attacking Elliot Spitzer for zealously prosecuting politicians for paying for sex, when he was doing the very same thing himself is one thing. But otherwise all the drama and opinion about a man's personal life or whether you, as an anonymous internet poster "like" someone you've never met before is below the level of serious discourse.
You guys are gonna make me quote a feminist again.
Great Minds Discuss Ideas. Average Minds Discuss Events. Small Minds Discuss People.
At least try to stick with the middle one.
Ad hominem is greek, and is one of the categories of logical fallacy identified by Greek philosophy, as listed in Aristotle''s Sophistical Refutations. It is not just PUA lingo like negging and establishing kino.What is going on here? How did Scott Ritter go from being the darling hero of the atheist far left in 2001 to having so many die hard conservative Christian men fanboying over him in 2024 (same goes for Glen Greenwald)? Weird. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. This proves my point about fame and those who seek it. Snap out of it boys! A pedophile has you under his fame-spell. Next you'll be gleefully passing out thumbs downs for those who call Noam Chomsky a misinformed, controlled-op jew.
This is one of the most interesting things about the Israeli-Hamas war. That is, all of the confusion and cross-over-reverse politicking between America's left and right. In 2001 you couldn't find a conservative Christian man that didn't want to "genocide" Muslims and now that someone (regardless of who) is doing just that you have Christian conservative men crying "War crimes on Muslims!" All jews and Muslims are spritually on the same side, and therefore going to hell for denying Our Lord Jesus Christ. So why all the concern for our Muslim enemies? I just don't get it? Bizarro World.
And can we ease up on the PUA/manosphere terminology of "ad hominem"? Attacking a person's "person" is the same thing as attacking his ideas. If you're a shi**y person then you have shi**y ideas. Expose one, and you expose the other.
Understood. Not to further derail on Ritter but I'm aware of the Greeks, and Aristotle and the Latin origins of language. This is the funny thing, nobody was disputing that Ritter makes good points or got Iraq right. We simply said "be careful" trusting the analysis of life long public speakers who get paid to beat other people over the head with their brilliant, oh so original "ideas." How long can you get paid to talk "at me" with your "expertise" simply based on a modicum amount of fame and real world experience from 25 years ago? I get it, war is inevitable, it's eventually going to happen, and nobody's going to do a thing to stop it. Sheer brilliance. Now, if you really want to help society, go get a job and physically build something of value that helps others (wells, roads, houses, etc.). But no, I think I'll just sit here on my fat as* repeating the same thing over and over while watching porn and writing another book that doesn't move the needle one inch.Ad hominem is greek, and is one of the categories of logical fallacy idenified by Greek philosophy, as listed in Aristotle''s Sophistical Refutations. It is not just PUA lingo like negging and establishing kino.
According to Aristotle, dismissing Ritter's useful expert commentary on Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Gaza based on personal disparagement of him is a logical fallacy to avoid addressing his correct and substantive points.
That is fair... Ritters tract record has been so so...and it's not that hard to debunk his claims.
It is relevant to consider the source however...and it's fair game that if someone is a pervert... They can be labeled appropriately in the process of pointing out their flaws.
AJ is clearly an alcoholic. Doesn't mean he's not capable of being right on many things for example.