The Destruction of Modern Women

I strongly disagree with this. I have far less sympathy for women because they start from a privileged position and all they have to do is not mess things up. Whereas young men today start handicapped and have to struggle to get anywhere.

Somebody who was born into a poor family and remains poor deserves more sympathy than a poor person who was born into a wealthy family and inherited wealth then proceeded to squander it all on hookers, cocaine and gambling. The first poor person in this example is like modern young men and the second poor person is like modern young women.

I didn't say the young woman deserves as much sympathy as the young man, just that she deserves sympathy. It's not easy to break through deception if you're fed lies from childhood.
 
This is like locking a starving man in a room, then placing twinkies in front of him, and afterwards criticizing him for eating garbage food.

Men aren't perpetuating the cycle. Young men are victims of the cycle.

The women just want easy cash, they have no excuse for whoring themselves out either online or in person. At most I can feel sympathy for a whore who is trying to feed her children, and yet Jesus forgave whores much worse than that.

Thus if Christ forgave terrible whores, there is basically nothing we can hold against young men who participate in porn or the hook up culture, since they are merely trying to alleviate their starvation of female love and attention. Likewise women who participate in hook up culture are simply fed lies from birth, so it is easy to have sympathy for them as well.
You're operating off a false dichotomy. No one is denying that young men are victims, they couldn't help being born into this. But that does not mean they are not also victimizers. You can't beat off to porn and chase whores then turn around and complain about not being able to find a good woman. It don't work that way

The same goes for women. They are victims in the sense that they were raised to be whores by whores and are ignorant of the modest life. But ignorance is not innocence. So by living and incentivizing the whore life, they remain victimizers.

Both can be forgiven, but both must take responsibility. If there is one thing that unrepentant sinners can't do, it's take responsibility.

I understand you to have a weak stance on abortion. Why would you take a weak stance on one of the key factors that enables this whorish enterprise?
 
Urkel is a broke, pot smoking, alien summoning tard...
I can't believe I'm famous and living rent free in the minds of The Enemy. I never thought my life would amount to so much and that I'd be important enough for a stalker to stalk me for what is now going on 10 years and to take so many copious amount of notes on my past life. But let me give you some updates and revisions for your novel, "The Life And Times Of Purple Urkel: A Memoir Of Greatness":
Urkel is broke...
No longer true.
Urkel is a pot smoker...
No longer true.
Urkel is an alien summoning tard who thinks he can contact UFOs and communicate with aliens...
Not true, I've only had two encounters with UFO's, and in only one of those was there any type of "communication." But in no way can I, or have I ever been able to "summon" aliens.
As for me I drink and thus enjoy stalking members here via multiple accounts because I have nothing better to do with my Christ-denying, atheistic life. Please pray for me.
 
Absolutely brilliant!! Now maybe you can teach this sorry band of misfits! Those who can do DO those who can’t, well you see them here! The circle jerk of posters is a sorry state. Let us investigate who we have. Samson, that is a complete and utter form of retardation who sucks the Trump teat, and claims to be a semen-arian. Yes semen like seed, but I question what type of semen this is!

There is a misfit, broke, pot smoking, alien summoning tard. None other than Urkel, look what a loser who thinks he can contact UFOs and communicate with aliens and you are listening to these fools? As for me I may drink yes, but do what!

Get back on track men, make this a real bastion of Christianity, and throw out the loser members and leadership. Be real men, not losers on here. Abandon this forum and live your life, grow some stones,
Rowan Atkinson Attack GIF by Working Title


Thanks for the pep talk. I needed that.
 
You're operating off a false dichotomy. No one is denying that young men are victims, they couldn't help being born into this. But that does not mean they are not also victimizers. You can't beat off to porn and chase whores then turn around and complain about not being able to find a good woman. It don't work that way

The same goes for women. They are victims in the sense that they were raised to be whores by whores and are ignorant of the modest life. But ignorance is not innocence. So by living and incentivizing the whore life, they remain victimizers.

Both can be forgiven, but both must take responsibility. If there is one thing that unrepentant sinners can't do, it's take responsibility.

I understand you to have a weak stance on abortion. Why would you take a weak stance on one of the key factors that enables this whorish enterprise?

Like I said a few pages ago, while people born into sin are innocent at first, they can become culpable over time if they do not work to overcome it.

Everyone does this by the way - which is why we all intrinsically give sympathy to a child, than we would a teen, then a young adult, then adult, then elderly. At each stage people expect others to "grow up" and learn how to combat the sins they inherited.

So for the boys born into a world where porn is available at the local library computer, I find them to be victims and not responsible.
 
So for the boys born into a world where porn is available at the local library computer, I find them to be victims and not responsible.
I don't understand this. If you had a son and you caught him surfing porn on the web, would you discipline him? If so, why? If not, why?

This false either-or dialectic of victim vs victimizer is a classic Marxist mindset. Once you give yourself permanent victim status, you never see yourself as the one perpetrating the problem, and thus remove any impetus to take responsibility and correct your behavior. That's exactly why leftists behave the way that they do.

Feminists do the same thing that you're doing right now. They give their side a pass by declaring themselves the victims and declaring the other side to be all victimizers. This pitting of the sexes against each other is a tool of Satan.

Again, the only way this gets fixed is for both sides to take accountability. The fastest way to make women take accountability is to remove abortion, so that they can no longer fornicate without restraint. Until then, we will remain in the situation we find ourselves in.
 
I don't understand this. If you had a son and you caught him surfing porn on the web, would you discipline him? If so, why? If not, why?
Obviously, a scenario where they get disciplined for it would be ideal, but I think most men who use porn never had parents who cared enough to discipline them and to protect them from pornography. Most people born after the year 2000 were simply handed an internet-capable device and told to shut up instead of being raised. I think if you ask your average porn user what led to him using porn for the first time, "I had unrestricted and unsupervised internet access when puberty hit and my hormones were going insane" will almost always be the answer. This being the case, I agree with Samseau's view that boys who start watching porn are really just victims of their circumstances.

It's different after they grow up, of course. There is a very different level of moral culpability between a 25-year-old man who uses porn every day and is very noticeably lecherous and dull as a result, and a 12-year-old boy who inexplicably owns a smartphone and of course finds out about porn as an inevitability. Either they constantly get bombarded with pornographic ads even when they just try to play innocent games or watch pirated anime or whatever, or someone, usually a same-age peer but unfortunately often an adult, introduces them to porn.
 
This being the case, I agree with Samseau's view that boys who start watching porn are really just victims of their circumstances.
Are girls who start whoring away really just victims of their circumstances as well? At this rate, the average family doesn't have a problem with it. They might even supply the birth control. How's a young girl to know any better if no one is telling her otherwise? Again, dispense with this false either victim or victimizer mindset. No sin is innocent.

Samseau shifted the goalpost of his argument. We were not talking about young boys watching porn on the local library computer. This is what we were talking about:
Thus if Christ forgave terrible whores, there is basically nothing we can hold against young men who participate in porn or the hook up culture, since they are merely trying to alleviate their starvation of female love and attention.

This is backwards thinking. It would be like saying that there is nothing we can hold against young women who participate in hook up culture, since they are merely trying to alleviate their starvation of male affection (not lust). We laugh at women who complain about not being able to find a good man after living the slut life. But with the other face we turn around and say that men are fine to engage in sin since they are just attention starved.

On a Christian level, Samseau is right in that there is nothing you can hold against anybody since you yourself are a sinner who needed forgiveness. But on a cultural level, the mindset is that there is nothing you can hold against anybody because it is their body, their choice, and they are just doing what makes them happy. If you want to fix the problem, you do not heap more grace on people already given over to licentiousness. That kind of grace is no grace at all. You give them Law. First, by speaking God's Word prophetically to them. Second, by going after the things that enable and promote their sin, such as pornography, abortion, no-fault divorce, etc.
 
I don't know much about these two guys but I found this clip interesting. The (((Weinstein))) guy has a good hypothesis as to why modern woman are so wishy-washy and confused about what "role" they want to play within the confines of a heterosexual relationship/marriage. They want to work outside the home but are unhappy with the men in their workplace who put in extra effort by staying late and working weekends because women want to cut out at 5pm sharp to be with their friends and family. So they resent the type of man who puts in extra hours/effort to "beat" them in the workplace. Yet at home they want that same type of workaholic man that they resent in the workplace to pick up the domestic/financial slack so that they can spend more time at... you guessed it... the workplace. A completely schitzoid contradiction that leads careerist women to be existentially unhappy with men in general which leads them to initiate 70%+ of all relationship break-ups and divorces. In other words, women have too many choices, and thus can't decide if they love men or hate men, leaving them perpetually confused, depressed, resentful, and dissatisfied with the men in their lives.

 
This is backwards thinking. It would be like saying that there is nothing we can hold against young women who participate in hook up culture, since they are merely trying to alleviate their starvation of male affection (not lust).

Starved of male attention? They are inundated with in from an early age. Sometimes there are girls with abusive fathers, however, most girls grow up with the princess treatment and have no shortage of men spoiling her, from fathers, cousins, or other boys at school, plus her other girlfriends.

Boys on the other hand literally have no one to talk to other than other boys. Most boys won't even get a kiss in high school, and yet for most of history most men would be looking at marriage by the time they were 18.
 
I don't know much about these two guys but I found this clip interesting. The (((Weinstein))) guy has a good hypothesis as to why modern woman are so wishy-washy and confused about what "role" they want to play within the confines of a heterosexual relationship/marriage. They want to work outside the home but are unhappy with the men in their workplace who put in extra effort by staying late and working weekends because women want to cut out at 5pm sharp to be with their friends and family. So they resent the type of man who puts in extra hours/effort to "beat" them in the workplace. Yet at home they want that same type of workaholic man that they resent in the workplace to pick up the domestic/financial slack so that they can spend more time at... you guessed it... the workplace. A completely schitzoid contradiction that leads careerist women to be existentially unhappy with men in general which leads them to initiate 70%+ of all relationship break-ups and divorces. In other words, women have too many choices, and thus can't decide if they love men or hate men, leaving them perpetually confused, depressed, resentful, and dissatisfied with the men in their lives.


Men should stop caring what modern career women are attracted to. They should be avoided entirely. We should be using that time to focus on improving our own lives and putting ourselves in places to meet traditional women that don't make men's lives hell.

Men need to stop enabling horrible women.
 
Just using your logic. Who are the women whoring with? You can't blame women for being whores and give men a pass for chasing whores at the same time. It takes two to tango. Rather, assign responsibility to both.
In my experience, working in a very social setting, they are mostly whoring with other women. If not other women, a very small percent of men will give them the pleasure they are seeking, without too many others knowing of their sleeping around. A tiny % of men find a hack into how to sleep around and the women are okay with these few men doing so. Most of this tiny % are super good looking guys, often athletes, often even men their own fathers cheer for and live vicariously through while watcing sportsball on TV.
 
We're not bemoaning over dykes.


The 80/20 rule is a problem, I agree. So without speaking in generalities, how do we solve this problem?
These young women are not lesbians, but they want to "experiment". Experimenting proves to them they can get this pleasure, without a relationship or even a "body count" in their mind. I know of one young, beautiful, intelligent, happy, kind young woman, whom I thought "wow, she would be a good mother". A few times I have heard her talking about her escapades with other women. And she is straight and now has a boyfriend. I see it a lot with young straight women. I work in a very social setting, and I am privy to behind-the-scenes knowledge.

The only fix I see is overthrowing the system that treats men as 2nd class citizens. And I don't see that happening any time soon. The most likely outcome is the system eventually crashes in on itself and hopefully thereafter men learn that women have no role in politics or most of the outside world, outside of raising children and tending to the sick and elderly.
 
Back
Top