The Destruction of Modern Women

So if we want to solve the problem and overthrow the system, shouldn't we as men take the responsibility to not engage in, enable, and promote these things, and further, should seek instead to abolish these things?
Yes, though I don't see any of it being abolished as long as women have the right to vote, which is why the system must be replaced by one in which women don't vote.
 
Yes, though I don't see any of it being abolished as long as women have the right to vote, which is why the system must be replaced by one in which women don't vote.
All of these problems bleed into each other. The reason so many men are becoming fags or porn addicts is because they can't get laid. They can't get laid because women are ultra-selective. Women are ultra-selective because they can fornicate without consequence. They can fornicate without consequence because they have free birth control. They also have no responsibility under no-fault divorce. Sexual liberty (slavery) gives women lopsided power over men. All of this was by design and is used to systematically dismantle the society. It's a perversion of God's order from top to bottom.

I expect the Left to push this degeneracy at the representative level. The fact that the representative Right is neutral (at best) to all of this just shows that the game is rigged and that they do not have the society's best interests at heart.
 
Last edited:
You can't blame women for being whores

I didn't, I said girls deserve sympathy for being brainwashed at an early age. Their egos are inflated to gargantuan proportions, setting them up failure down the road. That's how this entire chain of response started, when Australia Sucks challenged me on this point, to which I replied that girls do not deserve as much sympathy as boys, but they still deserve sympathy.
 
Their egos are inflated to gargantuan proportions, setting them up failure down the road.
Yeah these average plain Janes act like they're a 10 and expect you to worship them. Meanwhile, some of the hottest Christian women I've met actually have the most humility. Says a lot about how well their parents did raising them. Usually home schooled and even home churched as well.
 
Are girls who start whoring away really just victims of their circumstances as well?
I mean, yeah. I've stated this before throughout this thread. Women are very gullible, so their level of moral culpability for being promiscuous is greatly diminished since they're born in an environment specifically designed to get them to do that. See the following excerpt from one of my posts:
That said, my understanding is that the Just Judge will take everyone's circumstances into consideration. We all know this is a world where some people really are just screwed from birth.

This being the case, since women are innately much weaker than men (both mentally and physically), as well as disconnected from reality to some extent, and since they were born in an inverted society which completely fails to protect them and lead them, and which in fact goes out of its way to foment and encourage all of their worst instincts and to ensure that there is not a smidge of humility within them, there is no doubt in my mind that God will show them some kind of leniency. How much of it, I do not know.
I don't know that they have no culpability at all, I tend to think that even they know deep down that their bad behavior is bad, and I think a lot of them do have good examples and guidance but willingly decide to ignore them. Regardless, I don't know their hearts and I am not qualified to make that judgement.
Again, dispense with this false either victim or victimizer mindset. No sin is innocent.
I have no such mindset. I am not talking about victimizers or victims. I am simply saying that moral culpability can be diminished by external factors.
It would be like saying that there is nothing we can hold against young women who participate in hook up culture, since they are merely trying to alleviate their starvation of male affection (not lust).
A woman never, ever, under any circumstances has any such starvation. Even fat women all have simps.
On a Christian level, Samseau is right in that there is nothing you can hold against anybody since you yourself are a sinner who needed forgiveness. But on a cultural level, the mindset is that there is nothing you can hold against anybody because it is their body, their choice, and they are just doing what makes them happy.
He said no such thing whatsoever. You're shadowboxing here. We agree, so relax a little.
If you want to fix the problem, you do not heap more grace on people already given over to licentiousness.
No, but you can have sympathy for them and their circumstances.
You give them Law. First, by speaking God's Word prophetically to them. Second, by going after the things that enable and promote their sin, such as pornography, abortion, no-fault divorce, etc.
I agree with all of this.
 
Last edited:
The 80/20 rule is a problem
Most of the focus should be on women staying virgins until marriage as well as marrying under 25.

Even if we get a quarter of the top 20% of men (which is 5%) to stop, the next top 5% of men would just take their place. Meanwhile if a quarter of 80% of women (which is 20%) stopped being whores, then that would make a bigger difference.

If a quarter of the bottom 80% of men stopped watching porn? Negligible difference.
 
Last edited:
when Australia Sucks challenged me on this point, to which I replied that girls do not deserve as much sympathy as boys, but they still deserve sympathy.
In my mind they don't need anymore sympathy they already have too much sympathy what they need is for their huge egos to be brought down a few pegs.

It will be interesting to see if the current crop of girls being born in Afghanistan today will be actually be humble when they are 18.
 
In my mind they don't need anymore sympathy they already have too much sympathy what they need is for their huge egos to be brought down a few pegs.

It will be interesting to see if the current crop of girls being born in Afghanistan today will be actually be humble when they are 18.
What they need, and what I believe Samseau was getting at, is love. Not love as the world sees it, but true love. The greatest form of love is to care for their souls. Often this love appears harsh, as with a father disciplining a disobedient son. The sicker the patient, the more bitter this medicine will be.

Most of the focus should be on women staying virgins until marriage as well as marrying under 25.

Even if we get a quarter of the top 20% of men (which is 5%) to stop, the next top 5% of men would just take their place. Meanwhile if a quarter of 80% of women (which is 20%) stopped being whores, then that would make a bigger difference.

If a quarter of the bottom 80% of men stopped watching porn? Negligible difference.
Yes if 20% of women repent that would hugely improve our marriage prospects and family formation. But any change has to start with the men. Men need to lead women to change, women will never take initiative on their own en masse.

Actually getting the top 5% of men to stop their own whorish behavior would be a huge motivator. Women would see this and realize those men, who are still desirable, don't want them anymore.

If 20% of men stopped using porn, that would significantly decrease the simping. Porn and cam sites would bleed users (and this is destroying not only the West, but also Eastern Europe and South America where many of the content creators live) and some of the women would be forced to find another occupation. Many of those 20% of men would then be motivated to change their lives and join the top 20%.
 
You can't beat off to porn and chase whores then turn around and complain about not being able to find a good woman.
Most don't do that as you know, they didn't have many prospects or anyone treating them well for 20 years. For some, after the pop boom, it was probably never going to work or matter, if we're honest, anyway.
Who are the women whoring with? You can't blame women for being whores and give men a pass for chasing whores at the same time. It takes two to tango. Rather, assign responsibility to both.
You know this as well - it actually takes 5% to tango with near all, not two.
The 80/20 rule is a problem, I agree.
There we go. Most women by the way just keep holding out for grass is greener, something few realize. They do a lot of avoiding men and passing up good men, waiting for others, or just getting attention but then not doing much of anything.
The only fix I see is overthrowing the system that treats men as 2nd class citizens.
That's right. How and when that actually happens is always harsher and takes longer than most think.
All of these problems bleed into each other. The reason so many men are becoming fags or porn addicts is because they can't get laid. They can't get laid because women are ultra-selective. Women are ultra-selective because they can fornicate without consequence. They can fornicate without consequence because they have free birth control. They also have no responsibility under no-fault divorce. Sexual liberty (slavery) gives women lopsided power over men. All of this was by design and is used to systematically dismantle the society. It's a perversion of God's order from top to bottom.
Yes yes yes.
I mean, yeah. I've stated this before throughout this thread. Women are very gullible, so their level of moral culpability for being promiscuous is greatly diminished since they're born in an environment specifically designed to get them to do that.
Again, they are far closer to children. Even young boys, mostly without testosterone, but into adolescence still, think and lean heavily on what others are doing. I don't even think women think that much, they just react, do what others do, talk about what others talk about, and then maybe have some marginally informed opinion about a topic because they had to do things like work and file taxes here and there.

The biggest problem is that women peak super early, have whatever they're going to have early in life, and they can't or will not allow themselves to think about anything in the future or what actions might be best in terms of the last 60 years of their lives. Since this is the case, men are all seeking youth for obvious reasons, which only lasts a short period of time, or dealing with other aging women who increasingly act up, act out, and make anything important, like telling the truth, something painful to talk about.
 
This means that in every 10 woman. There´s at least 5 worthy.
You’re jumping to the wrong conclusion.

There are many miserable people who are married. Often they do not divorce because of a range of reasons.

Often for financial reasons or for the sake of the children couples who despise each other and are miserable stay married. Sometimes they stay married for religious reasons.

When I was in primary school I had a friend whose parents hated each other and almost never spoke to each other. The father was a womaniser and occasionally drunk and the woman seemed like the naggy type and was fat. Visiting his house I always remember the tension in his house was palpable. But his parents remained married because the mother was a strict Latina catholic and did not believe in divorce.

If out of 10 couples 5 are divorced of the remaining 5 couples 3 are likely miserable. And the 2 out of 10 that are happy couples a lot of them have been married for 20+ years before women were as rotten as today. If a man and woman get married in a western country today who the current crop pf modern women they would be lucky if 10% of them had a happy marriage.
 
You’re jumping to the wrong conclusion.

There are many miserable people who are married. Often they do not divorce because of a range of reasons.

Often for financial reasons or for the sake of the children couples who despise each other and are miserable stay married. Sometimes they stay married for religious reasons.

When I was in primary school I had a friend whose parents hated each other and almost never spoke to each other. The father was a womaniser and occasionally drunk and the woman seemed like the naggy type and was fat. Visiting his house I always remember the tension in his house was palpable. But his parents remained married because the mother was a strict Latina catholic and did not believe in divorce.

If out of 10 couples 5 are divorced of the remaining 5 couples 3 are likely miserable. And the 2 out of 10 that are happy couples a lot of them have been married for 20+ years before women were as rotten as today. If a man and woman get married in a western country today who the current crop pf modern women they would be lucky if 10% of them had a happy marriage.
If a woman stays with a man. At least I think we can agree they are not gold diggers. Cause financially raping the men in divorce is easy.
As for unhappy marriage statistics. You give one example. And extrapolate to some numbers which I think are made up.

Marriages are not hollywood movies. They have good and bad moments. Raising children is extremely demanding.

And yes catholics raise their daughters right.
 
If 20% of men stopped using porn, that would significantly decrease the simping.
Watching porn and simping are not the same. As I stated earlier most of the simping money comes from middle aged married men. If young men stopped watching porn it would be good for those individuals but it wouldn’t be near as big of an effect as 20% of women being chaste until marriage.
 
If a woman stays with a man. At least I think we can agree they are not gold diggers. Cause financially raping the men in divorce is easy.
You cannot squeeze blood from a stone. In some marriages both the man and the woman are poor and divorce rape is meaningless because the man has no wealth (or high income) to extract so they stay married because it allows them to split the living expenses.
 
As for unhappy marriage statistics

Psychologist Ty Tashiro has said, “Of all the people who get married, only three in ten remain in healthy, happy marriages.”


“In the United States, nearly 40 percent of marriages end in divorce. Another 10 to 15 percent of couples separate and do not divorce, and another 7 percent or so stay together but are chronically unhappy.”
 

Psychologist Ty Tashiro has said, “Of all the people who get married, only three in ten remain in healthy, happy marriages.”


“In the United States, nearly 40 percent of marriages end in divorce. Another 10 to 15 percent of couples separate and do not divorce, and another 7 percent or so stay together but are chronically unhappy.”
Wow, if only 30% of people who get married are happy, and a large % never get married and likely are never happy, there are not many happy people in the USA. And not only is nothing being done to address this issue, but the only things also our govt. and society push make these situations spread further and wider.
 

Psychologist Ty Tashiro has said, “Of all the people who get married, only three in ten remain in healthy, happy marriages.”


“In the United States, nearly 40 percent of marriages end in divorce. Another 10 to 15 percent of couples separate and do not divorce, and another 7 percent or so stay together but are chronically unhappy.”
Who the f is Ty Tashiro and how and where did he get his data?

Man always complain about marriages. Thats what being a man is.

The bad part about marriage is not having sex with other women. Being unmarried and celibate? Jews really managed to brainwash young people. I tell my kids women are a toy. Like PlayStation. Its for you to have fun with.

For marriage:

Of course low notch count
No social media
Good relationship with father.
Boner test approved

My wife didnt know how to cook. My mother in law taught her.

Imagine the kid is with varicele for 15 days she is putting some cream in each red spot. They have each around 100.
This like every 4 hours. Now its two kids with spots.

Find a catholic girl. The smartest are already doing it.

Here I googled the first result:


For all flavors.
 
After browsing that site, no thanks. "Psychologists" and "marriage counselors" are a big no-no in my book. What's wrong with seeing a priest for marriage counseling?
LinkedIn? A site filled with Leftists' viewpoints and agenda? Yeah...no thanks.

Edit. For those wondering why I'm against "psychologists" and "marriage counselors", look at how unhappy Western Women are. What is up with mental health professionals giving depression drugs to Western Women? Why prescribe depression drugs and how is that suppose to help Western Women treat their so-called depression symptoms? Drugs numb a woman's soul.

Go to church. See a priest. They don't prescribe prescription drugs to destroy one's soul.

This is why I don't trust mental health professionals. Same can be applied to LGBQT agenda, race agenda, etc.
 
Last edited:
Edit. For those wondering why I'm against "psychologists" and "marriage counselors", look at how unhappy Western Women are. What is up with mental health professionals giving depression drugs to Western Women? Why prescribe depression drugs and how is that suppose to help Western Women treat their so-called depression symptoms? Drugs numb a woman's soul.
Psychologists and marriage counselors are a bunch of gynocentric Jewish quacks and it's in their best interest to create and prolong problems. That said, there are cases where people are so far gone that the drugs are just necessary. A very concerning amount of women would self-harm or genuinely kill themselves if they didn't have SSRIs.
Of course low notch count
No social media
Good relationship with father.
Boner test approved
You are describing a complete unicorn. Let alone the other three bulletpoints, I have yet to meet a single woman, anywhere, of any age, who does not use social media. Even grandmas all use social media. Even the antisocial NEET women are at least on Discord and have a couple e-orbiters. It's totally disgusting.
I tell my kids women are a toy.
Yeah, like Chucky.
 
Back
Top