The Destruction of Modern Women

So how would that work for Orthodox if your wife let's herself go to the point where you simply don't want to fulfill that side of marital duties? Like, she gets fat and won't brush her teeth or something, but she's not technically turning you down?
Back in the day this was part of the reason men had mistresses on the side (and wealthy men still often do). Although of course this is not the Christian way. But anyway if you are you allowing your wife to get fat? You should be taking action on this.
 
So how would that work for Orthodox if your wife let's herself go to the point where you simply don't want to fulfill that side of marital duties? Like, she gets fat and won't brush her teeth or something, but she's not technically turning you down?

That falls under rule 8, of not upholding the responsibilities of marriage.

A major responsibility of marriage is that each spouse gains control over the other's body. If your wife likes a beard you grow a beard, if she likes you shaved then you must shave. Likewise if the man likes his wife to be in good shape and grow her hair, then she needs to also do that.

Of course, when it comes to something like going to the gym, it is hypocrisy to demand it from your spouse and not do it yourself, so, for many things regarding the upkeep of our bodies it should be done mutually. However, if one refuses and lets themselves go, this falls under not upholding the responsibilities of marriage since one's body is no longer an individual.

"The two become one flesh."
 
IMG_4385.jpeg

White marriages are being sabotaged.
 
Lately I have noticed a massive difference in the quality of women at church that wear a dress or look like they're from the 1950s. Several of them even dress like that on a regular day.

I'm not saying to automatically avoid women that don't wear a dress, or to start simping right away for any woman wearing one. But it is absolutely noticeable when you start talking to them.
 
Last edited:


So much for China being based. The feminism and hypergamy there is off the charts. its every bit as bad as the west. The only difference is Chinese men are waking up to the reality of things much faster than western men and have started refusing to simp for these older leftover women with insane standards. Based on this video it seems the majority of Chinese women from larger cities expect to land land a top 1% man when they are aged 30 or 35. Its absolutely insane. I am surprised the Chinese leadership is not doing more to address this.

In the video there was literally a 34 year old woman complaining she cannot find a man. And she required a man who has a house, a postgraduate degree and is handsome and earns 1 million yuan per year ($138,000 USD). You honestly cannot make this stuff up.

At this point the Chinese government should honestly put a special penalty tax on unmarried women over 25 and give the money to married couples with children (with a fixed annual bonus payment per child).

But I was also honestly impressed by how based the Chinese dudes in the video seemed. Western men could really learn something from them.
 
Last edited:


So much for China being based. The feminism and hypergamy there is off the charts. its every bit as bad as the west. The only difference is Chinese men are waking up to the reality of things much faster than western men and have started refusing to simp for these older leftover women with insane standards. Based on this video it seems the majority of Chinese women from larger cities expect to land land a top 1% man when they are aged 30 or 35. Its absolutely insane. I am surprised the Chinese leadership is not doing more to address this.

1000759501.jpg

1.78m is 5'10. They're asking for 5'11 and up? In China? ROFL.

I don't think there's anything Chinese leadership could do about this, short of forcing these women to marry a more realistic guy. The problem here is not Chinese leadership, it's just that these are women.

I love this line from the video, "the city is overflowing with beautiful mature single women." The euphemism is just comical. So these are hags, got it.
 
Last edited:
At this point I am beginning to wonder if there are any countries left in the world were women are not delusional?
Being delusional is not a bug or a corruption in women, it's a feature. Women are innately disconnected from reality to some degree, which is supposed to make them full of childlike wonder, which would allow them to make their husbands' lives much brighter. The problem is that social engineers have used that trait of women in very clever and evil ways. They have also have taken away men's ability to control their women when they get all hysterical and start causing trouble as a result of this trait.

Women have retard moments, this is normal, always has been. What's not normal is for men to have no recourse when it happens. My grandfather had the option of just locking his wife in a room until she stopped being a retard, and he had the support of the entire society. His wife simply did not have the option of refusing to submit to him, causing him trouble or abandoning him, because the entire society punished such behaviors harshly. That's all gone now.
 
I am surprised the Chinese leadership is not doing more to address this
I agree given their traditions and history, unity and uniformity.
At this point I am beginning to wonder if there are any countries left in the world were women are not delusional?
It's not a conspiracy, that's for sure, considering how different culturally all these countries are, yet women resort to the same behavior en masse. Very telling/confirmatory of the experiments we've done to come to a stark conclusion about human/female nature. Good on the Chinese men too, for not simping and letting it die. It's happening in the west as well, but there isn't as cultural of a bias like in China for traditionalism and there is more propaganda here, whereas China does nothing of the sort from at least their own governmental or societal levels.
 
Women are innately disconnected from reality to some degree, which is supposed to make them full of childlike wonder, which would allow them to make their husbands' lives much brighter.
While part of this may be a vestigial benefit for men, it's mostly the evolution of a trait to be at the beck and call of children. Jordan Peterson has a good talk/video on this. Their almost absurd (especially in the modern day, given less than harsh realities of life) attention and worry about children is just for the really young ages. But it's built in, so that neuroticism doesn't go away. So yes, it's a feature but as far as men are concerned, particularly after age 6-7 for kids, it's a bug.

Something that is red pill that seems black because of how we were all raised to believe that everyone is similar and/or equal is when you come to the realization of things like Australia and I have, and I think most around here are the same, they just don't say it as bluntly or forcefully.

The problem is that people can always use silly, stupid or normie men against the obvious arguments that 99% of women have absolutely predictable, almost crazy responses to things that cause major problems for almost all of men, and society.
 


So much for China being based. The feminism and hypergamy there is off the charts. its every bit as bad as the west. The only difference is Chinese men are waking up to the reality of things much faster than western men and have started refusing to simp for these older leftover women with insane standards. Based on this video it seems the majority of Chinese women from larger cities expect to land land a top 1% man when they are aged 30 or 35. Its absolutely insane. I am surprised the Chinese leadership is not doing more to address this.

In the video there was literally a 34 year old woman complaining she cannot find a man. And she required a man who has a house, a postgraduate degree and is handsome and earns 1 million yuan per year ($138,000 USD). You honestly cannot make this stuff up.

At this point the Chinese government should honestly put a special penalty tax on unmarried women over 25 and give the money to married couples with children (with a fixed annual bonus payment per child).

But I was also honestly impressed by how based the Chinese dudes in the video seemed. Western men could really learn something from them.

I posted something about china a while back:
“It isn’t as simple as lowering the minimum ages [to boost birth rates],” Peng said. “To have more children, we are asking women to get married early – this still means we still see women as baby-making machines.“
This is a major problem with political correctness. If you want to boost birth rates suddenly you’re seen as dehumanizing women.
The real retardation in this is if you care about birth rates and want to increase them, you need women to have more babies, so that in and of itself is seeing them as “baby-making machines,” is it not? However, these people act as if the determining factor of if women are baby machines is if they marry when young, which does not make sense.
 
The real retardation in this is if you care about birth rates and want to increase them, you need women to have more babies, so that in and of itself is seeing them as “baby-making machines,” is it not? However, these people act as if the determining factor of if women are baby machines is if they marry when young, which does not make sense.
Absolutely. These people who say things like this and push for women to have "heckin' careers" (actually just doing the easiest basic nonsense in MSOffice, that's all any of these women's careers ever amount to) are disgusting.
 
Baby-making machine, vs. money-making machine, like all men already are?

Fundamentally you can see the evil in how they rebel against the curse of original sin: Men must work, and women must breed; if either sex ignores this curse then they die. For men this curse is literal, and for women it is more figurative since women without children leave no future. Thus the women of the future will always be the ones who marry and have children.
 
Back
Top