The Destruction of Modern Women

[Blade Runner]

The stark difference between early 20th century men and the later ones in the 1990's is sadly clear. I also think the lack of technology watching and broadcasting the demographics and culture changes played a role in women's suffrage. For example, before social media, men used to speculate whether a women could or couldn't handle important decisions and usually gave them the benefit of the doubt, now we can see them make poor decisions online with timestamps and ease of reference.

In a certain sense, though, you could argue that eventually it was always going to happen, due to technological efficiency and ease of life generally with increasing standards of living.

The real question is what causes restriction of women to come back, or what can a culture do to get that balance reasonable. We're WAY beyond anything healthy for women, children, family formation, or fertility - at least for european peoples.

 

[Unending Powerhouse Match]

The real question is what causes restriction of women to come back, or what can a culture do to get that balance reasonable.

And maybe the answer is that you can't. Maybe some things just cannot be repaired once broken. Maybe it's over and an age of darkness is upon us, and it's up to our grandchildren or great-grandchildren to build something anew, because it will not be feasible until their generation.

But we are going to try.

 

[Blade Runner]

And maybe the answer is that you can't. Maybe some things just cannot be repaired once broken. Maybe it's over and an age of darkness is upon us, and it's up to our grandchildren or great-grandchildren to build something anew, because it will not be feasible until their generation.

But we are going to try.

That's right, the repair is through creative destruction. How long that takes, no one knows. Til then, get your passport ready! lol

 

[Samseau]

The real question is what causes restriction of women to come back, or what can a culture do to get that balance reasonable. We're WAY beyond anything healthy for women, children, family formation, or fertility - at least for european peoples.

That occurs through mass conversion, or a return to the bronze age where no one can protect women and they are once again at the mercy of their husbands.

 

[Samseau]

As for women's "suffrage" :

Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Look at how narrow some of the states that passed the amendment were:

House Speaker Seth M. Walker attempted to table the ratification resolution, but was defeated twice with a vote of 48–48. The vote on the resolution would be close. Representative Harry Burn, a Republican, had voted to table the resolution both times. When the vote was held again, Burn voted yes. The 24-year-old said he supported women's suffrage as a "moral right", but had voted against it because he believed his constituents opposed it. In the final minutes before the vote, he received a note from his mother, urging him to vote yes. Rumors immediately circulated that Burn and other lawmakers had been bribed, but newspaper reporters found no evidence of this.

On August 18, 1920, Tennessee narrowly approved the Nineteenth Amendment, with 50 of 99 members of the Tennessee House of Representatives voting yes.

There were many states where suffrage passed by 1 vote or less. Without the hundreds of thousands of faithful, God-fearing men who were sacrificed in WW1, there was no way this would have passed.

Another large factor was the enormous surge in widows in the wake of WW1 who wanted a job to support themselves, and it was figured if women could vote they could support themselves better. WW1 destroyed the fabric of American society, destroyed Europe, and brought about the conditions for Sodom and Gomorrah world we live in today. WW1 was truly the worst of all wars, that happened for literally no reason.

Also, it should be noted what a scam the draft is: Men are forced to go fight and die, and then lose their vote. In a fair and just society, frontline veterans would be given 5 votes, and those who are KIA should have a list of people who get to vote for them for the next 60 years. It's outrageous that men who show the greatest love, as "there is no greater love than to lay one's life down for their friends," end up losing the country they died for.

 

[homersheineken]

I know my biological clock is ticking and about to hit the wall, so my best course of action is .... prostitution.

 

[SkiPro]

hydration is part of that.

Oh no, you're not one of those people that carries a water bottle everywhere are you?

 

[Unending Powerhouse Match]

Oh no, you're not one of those people that carries a water bottle everywhere are you?

You underestimate my 'tism. I carry four whole bottles of filtered water to work every day, in fact. Glass bottles, of course. Free of microplastics.

 

[Samseau]

Oh no, you're not one of those people that carries a water bottle everywhere are you?

I definitely am one of those, and every time I bring a girl on a date she drinks out of it.

 

[SkiPro]

You guys are doing it wrong. All you need is coffee. Has water in it and you don't look like a nerd with your water bottle.

 

[Let God Arise]

You guys are doing it wrong. All you need is coffee. Has water in it and you don't look like a nerd with your water bottle.

My grandfather never drank water. He drank tons of tea and coffee. And he lived to be 95.
He did have halitosis and discolored teeth, so there is that.

 

[Unending Powerhouse Match]

You guys are doing it wrong. All you need is coffee. Has water in it and you don't look like a nerd with your water bottle.

 

[Blade Runner]

I know my biological clock is ticking and about to hit the wall, so my best course of action is .... prostitution.

One thing he missed at the end? The men in short supply also want women who are young, which are also in short supply but mostly due to social and propaganda/societal setup reasons. That is, by the time you "figure out" money might be better to seek all things equal (given your viewpoints), you've already lost your trading options or leverage.

 

[Thomas More]

As for women's "suffrage" :

Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Look at how narrow some of the states that passed the amendment were:





There were many states where suffrage passed by 1 vote or less. Without the hundreds of thousands of faithful, God-fearing men who were sacrificed in WW1, there was no way this would have passed.

Another large factor was the enormous surge in widows in the wake of WW1 who wanted a job to support themselves, and it was figured if women could vote they could support themselves better. WW1 destroyed the fabric of American society, destroyed Europe, and brought about the conditions for Sodom and Gomorrah world we live in today. WW1 was truly the worst of all wars, that happened for literally no reason.

Also, it should be noted what a scam the draft is: Men are forced to go fight and die, and then lose their vote. In a fair and just society, frontline veterans would be given 5 votes, and those who are KIA should have a list of people who get to vote for them for the next 60 years. It's outrageous that men who show the greatest love, as "there is no greater love than to lay one's life down for their friends," end up losing the country they died for.

The US had 53K dead in WWI, out of a population of 105 million. 320K total dead and wounded, but that includes light and moderate wounds, so the number of partially or fully disabled would be much lower. That's a lot but only 0.1% of men were killed.

 

[Samseau]

The US had 53K dead in WWI, out of a population of 105 million. 320K total dead and wounded, but that includes light and moderate wounds, so the number of partially or fully disabled would be much lower. That's a lot but only 0.1% of men were killed.

You're not counting Spanish flu deaths (and other diseases), which were mostly from soldiers stationed in unsanitary conditions overseas.

 

[dgbrown]

I’ve previously said that Nancy Mace and Marjorie Taylor Greene are embarrassments to the Republican Party.

Though this is a point relating to the American political landscape, it also relates to women generally, in that even “allies” are not immune to woefully deranged and destructive “feminine” behavior.

These two remind me of attention-seeking “trad wives” who use what I call trad wife-face to superficially appropriate the conservative cause while lapping it up almost exclusively for clicks and likes.

MTG especially may vocally support Trump policies but her attitude and demeanor are narcissistic and attention-seeking at all costs.

Mace is even worse temperament-wise, although more subtly, and her political positions have been anti-Trump before.

This piece from Reuters highlights how Mace is to a large extent just your typical histrionic feminist campus activist who, as a means of differentiation, doesn’t like the trans cult (even a broken clock is right twice a day):

US Rep. Nancy Mace accuses former fiancé, his business associates of rape, assault​

U.S. Representative Nancy Mace, in a graphic speech on the House floor, has accused her former fiancé and three other men of drugging and raping her and other women, and filming and photographing women and underage girls without their consent.

The Republican from South Carolina used her floor privileges late on Monday to level the accusations against the men, calling them "predators" as she described in detail what she said they did to her and other victims.

This is a self-serving “Republican” grandstander. She deliberately used privileges so she cannot be sued. She clearly lacks any evidence to take to police.

We are “protecting” women’s sports and threatening Title IX lawsuits if mentally ill men are allowed to compete, but doing nothing about the man-hating kangaroo courts that have ruined the lives of probably tens of thousands of men over the last decades?

If you’re wondering why this is, look no further than low-hanging-fruit-seekers like Mace, women like her in the GOP, and their RINO male simps.

 

[Samseau]

I’ve previously said that Nancy Mace and Marjorie Taylor Greene are embarrassments to the Republican Party.

Though this is a point relating to the American political landscape, it also relates to women generally, in that even “allies” are not immune to woefully deranged and destructive “feminine” behavior.

These two remind me of attention-seeking “trad wives” who use what I call trad wife-face to superficially appropriate the conservative cause while lapping it up almost exclusively for clicks and likes.

MTG especially may vocally support Trump policies but her attitude and demeanor are narcissistic and attention-seeking at all costs.

Mace is even worse temperament-wise, although more subtly, and her political positions have been anti-Trump before.

This piece from Reuters highlights how Mace is to a large extent just your typical histrionic feminist campus activist who, as a means of differentiation, doesn’t like the trans cult (even a broken clock is right twice a day):



This is a self-serving “Republican” grandstander. She deliberately used privileges so she cannot be sued. She clearly lacks any evidence to take to police.

We are “protecting” women’s sports and threatening Title IX lawsuits if mentally ill men are allowed to compete, but doing nothing about the man-hating kangaroo courts that have ruined the lives of probably tens of thousands of men over the last decades?

If you’re wondering why this is, look no further than low-hanging-fruit-seekers like Mace, women like her in the GOP, and their RINO male simps.

Feminists unmoved; https://www.motherjones.com/politic...maces-so-called-victim-hotline-advocates-say/

 

[dgbrown]

Feminists unmoved; https://www.motherjones.com/politic...maces-so-called-victim-hotline-advocates-say/

So she’s likely running against this guy in any gubernatorial bid and serendipitously, so serendipitously, he is complicit in allowing Nancy Mace’s “rape” to take place without any consequences?

Amazing how alleged crimes so often have the knack of being able to be used perfectly as a cudgel against one’s political rivals.

And to say nothing of the convenience of slagging an ex after an acrimonious break-up?

Is this the same ex she used to talk about in relation to their “great” sex life during the Congressional Prayer Breakfast meetings? And then she bragged about practicing abstinence after?

Can you guys all imagine if I became bitter that Samseau is a moderator and I am not, and I suddenly demanded a “Moderator Election” and whipped out stories about how as a 24-year-old Samseau came to live in Australia and terrorized 14-year-old me in outer inner Melbourne.

One of my horror tales would be:

“One time at the Knox shopping mall, during the school summer/Christmas break, Samseau started beating me mercilessly with a copy of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged he’d just purchased at Dymocks Booksellers and dragged me to the nearest Commonwealth Bank ATM and made me withdraw the $600 I had earned delivering papers (my rich parents made me work this pleb job to learn how the hoi polloi live) to buy a PlayStation 3. He also made me repeatedly call myself a ‘fag’ for listening to ‘Who let the dogs out’ on my iPod, all in front of my crush, Claire Percy-Corinth, future prefect of Methodist Ladies College, whose father often smoked cigars with my dad at the exclusive Men’s Lounge in Toorak.”

All of you should give what would be my miraculously convenient account, despite its patent absurdity, 10000x more credulity than Nancy Mace’s.

So, yeah, now I am the moderator, Samseau:

 

[Australia Sucks]

I just want to know from the personal experience of members here. I have been to a decent number of countries (9 countries so far if you include Australia). I have yet to visit a country where women as a whole are actually decent human beings and have any morals. Has modernity destroyed the women of every country or are there still a few holdouts left where women (in general) are actually decent human beings?

 

[Josephus]

I’ve previously said that Nancy Mace and Marjorie Taylor Greene are embarrassments to the Republican Party.

Though this is a point relating to the American political landscape, it also relates to women generally, in that even “allies” are not immune to woefully deranged and destructive “feminine” behavior.

These two remind me of attention-seeking “trad wives” who use what I call trad wife-face to superficially appropriate the conservative cause while lapping it up almost exclusively for clicks and likes.

MTG especially may vocally support Trump policies but her attitude and demeanor are narcissistic and attention-seeking at all costs.

Mace is even worse temperament-wise, although more subtly, and her political positions have been anti-Trump before.

This piece from Reuters highlights how Mace is to a large extent just your typical histrionic feminist campus activist who, as a means of differentiation, doesn’t like the trans cult (even a broken clock is right twice a day):



This is a self-serving “Republican” grandstander. She deliberately used privileges so she cannot be sued. She clearly lacks any evidence to take to police.

We are “protecting” women’s sports and threatening Title IX lawsuits if mentally ill men are allowed to compete, but doing nothing about the man-hating kangaroo courts that have ruined the lives of probably tens of thousands of men over the last decades?

If you’re wondering why this is, look no further than low-hanging-fruit-seekers like Mace, women like her in the GOP, and their RINO male simps.

Haven’t looked at the details, but it’s typical female behavior. If she has the evidence she claims she has then she should go ahead with a case.

Her being Republican and Christian mean nothing. Some of the Protestant women I’ve met have been by far the most deranged.