Paul Skallas talks a lot about this matter. He argues that people age a lot slower now because they care a lot about hydration now, unlike in the past. People used to virtually only drink things like coffee and alcohol. There has been a massive cultural shift in the past few decades towards a level of health consciousness which is arguably unprecedented historically, and hydration is part of that.
Indeed even current wars are very different to previous wars. With all the drones and other technology the casualty rates of a war are much lower than say world war 1 or world war 2. Also for example in Ukraine due to the visa situation for Ukranian women they have easy access to all of Europe meanwhile the fighting age men are stuck in Ukraine (due to the martial law restrictions). So the most attractive single young women have all fled Ukraine in droves and that far outnumbers the 700,000 Ukrainian men that died in the war. If anything by the time the war finishes Ukrainian men in terms of ratios will have less access to attractive women then they did before the war started.
It is poison in the sense that it makes you fat and gives you diseases like cancer. But it was also poison in the early 1900s because of no regulation and unrestricted capitalism.
That might be a small component, but I doubt it's very big.
This is definitely the main idea, and while again it's not most, it stands out because of human bias. We've learned a lot of things that are mild hacks or greater, and quite frankly I think people just didn't care and likely didn't know much previously. Nutrition was never understood by medicine to be fair, beyond certain disease processes. I bet only a few exercise enthusiasts even had good empirical knowledge of diet, and even then they were guessing because it was hard to get air time for everything, unlike now.
Exactly.
Yes, as you know, I've talked about the real issues which lead to women trying hard (unless there is selection pressure on them, they are inherently lazy -98% of them at least). Those are convergent things, and mainly M:F ratio. What comes with low male to female ratio is also a less productive economy, which further stresses the need for men in order to "get a better life". All of this, and I've said it probably 50x on the forum, should be evident at this point, as currently we have exactly the opposite in developed nations, too many men and too much materialism, comfort, excess, spoiling of women, etc. As such, women are fat on average and do very little for men - because they technically, at least at this point, don't have to. That's how most people are when we just analyze humans, but women are particularly bad in this realm.
To be fair, do you all think this happened/is a valid conclusion of what went down with Swamy? It could explain the retreat to Ohio, politically.
Important points.
I saw Ramasmarmy's big meltdown on Twitter when it happened, and I think that's a pretty accurate summary of the events, yeah. I think it woke up a good number of people. Which is why he got thrown under the bus. It was an incredibly bad look.
No doubt the women empowered the Jews. But who empowered the women? The weak and faithless men born in the late 19th century. We had the greatest country in the world. And now it's all gone to the dogs because some guys failed the world's biggest $h!t test.Interesting quotes and points.
To be fair, do you all think this happened/is a valid conclusion of what went down with Swamy? It could explain the retreat to Ohio, politically.
Important points.
That's actually one of the most amusing parts of the "greatest generation", it wasn't the 60s kids or boomers who gave women the right to vote.
Interesting quotes and points.
To be fair, do you all think this happened/is a valid conclusion of what went down with Swamy? It could explain the retreat to Ohio, politically.
Important points.
It's weird that that doesn't have much of an ingroup/outgroup expression or realization with their own race, though. It might on some other (subconscious) level when it comes to actually bearing children, but not in social policy.
It was "The Lost Generation", the generation of F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and Gertrude Stein that gave women the right to vote. They suffered through WWI, the Spanish Flu (which killed as many Americans as WWI did), the Great Depression (with the brief Roaring 20s to blow off steam). Perhaps people were exhausted and the most alpha men were so decimated, that the feminists just won out. Generation names with birth years:
The stark difference between early 20th century men and the later ones in the 1990's is sadly clear. I also think the lack of technology watching and broadcasting the demographics and culture changes played a role in women's suffrage. For example, before social media, men used to speculate whether a women could or couldn't handle important decisions and usually gave them the benefit of the doubt, now we can see them make poor decisions online with timestamps and ease of reference.
