There's some quote I saw recently about propaganda. Basically said the propaganda can make you think the sky is green even though you can see that it's blue. It's really amusing to see that literally nothing has changed in the past 40 years since this fear mongering started. Venice was predicted to be basically underwater years or decades before today, but it's pretty much the exact same. It's absolutely comical.
Apparently there is a lot of polar ice melting. Okay? The Earth has always gone through changes, and it will adapt and restore balance, like it always has.
There's no doubt that CO2 and other human activity can contribute to the climate, no one can argue this. The question is to what extent. But the real counter argument is that we simply do not understand the climate enough to make predictive forecasts about anything on such a large scale. Literally any atmospheric scientist worth his salt will admit this, and plenty of them have. They gaslight us into thinking weather isn't the same thing as climate, but it's literally the same thing: studying the atmosphere to make predictions, except climate is long term averages and patterns. If we cannot predict localized weather more than 10 days out what makes us think we can predict global climate changes years or decades out? The arrogance is astounding.
I could still make an argument that even if humans were causing "global warming" that we should keep doing it, because clearly that's just what we are designed to do. To treat it as a moral problem is ridiculous, do we shame beavers for building dams or tigers for killing elk? Why shame humanity for doing what clearly was a necessary stepping stone for progress? What's funny though, is we already discovered an extremely efficient and clean, sustainble energy source decades ago: nuclear energy. But for some reason, the left just hates it. You can't help but laugh at how absurd it is and how it's so clearly an agenda.