This sums up your entire argument on this thread, and the other Chinese haters. "They are too harsh". Says who? You? Who are you?Despite the descriptions and videos posted in this thread, you do not seem to be familiar with the actual occurrences of recent history in Tibet and Xinjiang, and so it is easy for you to dismiss them by false equivocation like just another abstract idea with no consequences.
While the way that Chinese do things is different from us, they go too hard even on the Muslims and on the Tibetan Buddhists, who are some of my least favorite people. They take the surveillance to such an extreme that it is bordering on round-the-clock mental torture.
My argument is that China's ability to do this came from Western technology and only continues because the West also continues to prop up China by manufacturing there, giving them technology and training, and allowing them to be educated in the West. China was used as the testbed for the development of a totalitarian technological control grid that is being rolled out in the West, so you may eventually discover if you really want that on your side of the planet as you have said.
Even if they are too harsh, it doesn't matter, might makes right and since we do nothing, they will win. And this backs up my point as to what they will do with the rest of the human population when there are no longer enough Whites to contain them.
The fact doesn't matter if you think they are too harsh or not, your opinion on this means nothing. What matters is who wins, and the fact that the Whites in the west do nothing, whereas China does something, means China will win.
China no longer needs western technology, they just need to maintain what they have stolen/copied, and wait for the west to commit suicide via third world immigration. They have already won, unless Whites become extremely radical, which I do not see happening.