Same old Piano notes, another massively bloated verbose answer filled with:
- personal attacks and strawmen. Here it is the notion that, because observing China and their government is doing better job in many areas at running their country, I must be some kind of a traitor to my country or race...
I recognize what China is doing and it is not impressive to me how many jews in America kvetch over them because I know the long con. They are not excluded from the New World Order and you are very simple-minded with your analysis if you think they are. Both the United States and China have very important parts to play in its birth. The US already did most of the dirty work the last 80 years. China will pick up where it left off, after much of this confusion fades away. If you studied Kalergi's work and those who came after him and continue it to this day you would know this but you shy away from racial realities like a rabbi from the presence of holy water.
- wildly inaccurate takes on many subjects you clearly don't know much about but will copy-paste big dumps to pretend you do. Let me take a few of those apart.
No, I do not post things on which I know little about. I admit my weaknesses freely. I am not very good at giving financial investment advice, nor am I good at allopathic medicine, or insurance claims, or secular legalism, because my soul is inherently against lies. Anything within the system I have a hard time of engaging in because of the spiritual discord I experience when doing so.
I write my own content unless I am quoting, citing, paraphrasing, summarizing, or linking something. Go ahead and search all of my posts into a browser and see what comes up.
Can't say the same for you, who has been copy-pasting years old posts and talking points from 911. This had been going on for months on RVF, and you bring the same here. Whether you have personally archived the entire RVF board when the opportunity still existed or not is speculative, because posting one time bangers ripped off the internet is easy, but engaging with knowledgeable members that have you covered from every angle in a real discussion is not.
China has not been running on foreign investment for decades now, they have an annual inflow of one trillion dollars per year just from their trade balance.
No, they most definitely have been capitalizing on foreign investment and becoming quite fat off of it.
The reality of China's economy is deeply entangled with global financial flows, much of which come from Western investment in Chinese manufacturing and technology. It's not that China is "self-sufficient" in the true sense it's that China has become a manufacturing powerhouse due to Western outsourcing. Without that they would be nowhere.
Western companies have moved massive portions of their supply chains to China in order to take advantage of cheap labor and lenient environmental regulations. Apple, Nike, and countless others are prime examples. This has displaced millions of jobs in the Western world, particularly in manufacturing, a point that you acknowledge.
China's "trade surplus" is a result of subsidized cheap labor and intellectual property theft that has been built on the backs of Western work undercut by corporations seeking to trim costs. The idea that China is "self-sufficient" ignores the massive Western corporate presence in China which benefits from low wages and a massive consumer market driven by Western-style capitalism that they now employ, something else you acknowledged.
They are creating new industries almost from scratch, including chips, EVs, and dominating them.
This is an exaggeration, to put it mildly.
China's semiconductor industry has advanced significantly, but it’s been heavily dependent on Western technology, particularly American-made software and equipment for semiconductor manufacturing. The recent U.S. export bans on semiconductor equipment to China are a testament to how dependent China still is on the West for this industry.
Similarly China’s EV market is growing rapidly, but it has largely relied on technology and supply chains from the West. Tesla has a massive footprint in China, and BYD which is one of China's leading EV companies has benefited from Western capital and technology to accelerate its rise. China didn't suddenly invent EVs out of nowhere, they capitalized on existing Western technological trends and flooded the market with cheap, mass-produced versions.
Their cars have had Toyota, VW and Ford engineers marveling at their designs. They are literally destroying Japanese and German companies like Nissan, Honda, Mitsubishi and VW that may not be around much longer.
Chinese automakers are increasingly competing in the global market but it's not because they have superior innovation or design but rather it's because of economic conditions that favor China’s massive state support, access to cheap labor, and a monopolistic market that stifles competition from established companies in the West and Japan.
Chinese companies like Geely and BYD have been able to thrive thanks to government subsidies, access to massive state-backed capital, and a protected domestic market. Chinese automakers can sell at low prices making it harder for companies like Toyota and Volkswagen to compete. This isn't a victory of innovation but a result of unfair trade practices and economic manipulation by the Chinese government, but I suppose it's a win in the 911/Cooper book because it hurts the West right?
Germany and Japan two of the most innovative and advanced nations in history are strategically denied the opportunity to fully develop their potential. This, coupled with the treachery that led to their downfall after World War II has kept them in check. Meanwhile China with Western support has risen to power capitalizing on the very systems that were designed to stifle the West's true potential. China's reliance on reverse-engineering Western technology and intellectual exploitation means all of their advancements are inherently parasitic, leveraging decades of work by Western minds.
China is becoming 'better' than the USA and it's inherently racial superiors in Germany and Japan by jewish design, not because "they've finally outdone the west on their own."
That is precisely what they just did! They struck a huge blow to the bloated Silicon Valley AI industry with a tiny team working on a shoestring budget. This has been the biggest story this year so far, the release of DeepSeek has taken half a trillion dollar off of Nvidia's market cap.
The idea that a "tiny team working on a shoestring budget" took down Nvidia is wildly misleading, Nvidia is the leader in AI chip development and its GPUs are the backbone of AI and machine learning worldwide. For any AI project to succeed, especially on the scale of DeepSeek, it requires substantial resources and technological infrastructure. The reality is that China’s success in this space is heavily funded by massive state backing in the form of subsidies as well as global partnerships with firms and technology originally developed in the West.
Have you ever been to Silicon Valley?? I don't think Noyce would recognize it. By 2000, the majority of EECS at firms like Intel, Sun, National Semiconductor, Apple were Chinese (mix of Taiwanese-American, ABCs and FOBs). EE grads from the main feeder schools (Berkeley, Stanford, CalTech SJSU, UCLA etc) have been majority Chinese.
They were given preferential hiring on purpose, they do not outperform White engineers on a global scale, there simply are more of the buggers.
Yes Chinese engineers make up a significant portion of Silicon Valley’s workforce but you're once again ignoring the role of treacherous anti-White immigration policies that favored Asian "talent," and the global labor arbitrage that led to an influx of workers from China and Taiwan. These engineers were often hired into well-established systems not as innovators but as technicians and engineers following the blueprint laid out by American and European innovators. The demand for cheap labor in the early stages of Silicon Valley's explosive growth was a key driver in this demographic change.
The hiring practices in Silicon Valley have been geared toward profit maximization. The fact that companies hired large numbers of Chinese and Taiwanese engineers is more a reflection of a globalization-driven demand for cheap trainable labor force and not because they were better engineers.
If the Asians were in charge of their own people like they had planned with GEACPS before the end of 1945 they would never have been sending anyone to any western alien land.
That doesn't change that White Americans and Europeans remain at the forefront of many high-tech industries particularly in the initial conceptualization of groundbreaking technologies. We are fewer in number, but greater in genius and creation.
The main reason Taiwan has been the global center of semiconductor industry is because this SV Chinese community set up shop there.
Hypersonic missile tech is built on the magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) theories of French plasma physicist Jean-Pierre Petit in the 1980s. He was considered a loon by the French scientific establishment and his work mothballed, except for the Russians, who picked up on the tremendous potential of MHD, the rooskies being more tuned in to the mathematical theories undergirding MHD. A few decades later, they have developed glider missiles that travel at mach 20 and torpedoes that cruise at 400kmh underwater. The Chinese did copy/reverse engineer Russian MHD tech, but are still 5 years behind, while the US is over a decade behind.
For any claim about global technological development, especially in a field as complex and secretive as military hypersonics or MHD, there is a vast amount of secrecy and classified information that makes it almost impossible for outsiders (even well-informed ones) to claim definitive timelines. You are making blanket statements about a field that is both esoteric and heavily classified.
So on what authority do you make these claims of one country being ahead or behind the other? Not even a senior consultant would be able to say this without being in a secure federal building admitting his technical expertise behind secure doors and walls to only ears that are legally permitted to hear this.
I will at least admit that in this day and age, no country is beyond intellectual theft, but no one has done it as much as the Chinese to get ahead. Perhaps israel has only done more, because they end up receiving everything that should be given to the American people.
The heyday of American military technology was in the 1970s, when programs like the F-14, F-15, F-16, Blackbird were developed. Today we are down to this:
Modern military technology today, especially in stealth, cyber warfare, AI, hypersonics, and drone warfare vastly outpaces the 1970s-era platforms. The F-22 Raptor is a next-generation fighter that leverages stealth, sensor fusion, and network-centric warfare capabilities. Military technologies evolve according to the needs of the time. The US military has shifted its focus from purely aerial superiority to multi-domain operations, which encompasses far more than fast fighter jets.
The US military procurement system is the most bloated, most corrupt bureaucracy in the history of bureaucracies, objectively measured in financial terms. The F-35 is a $2 trillion boondoggle that produced an inferior one trick pony (stealth) that apparently even the Iranians have figured out.
The $2 trillion figure typically refers to the lifetime costs over the decades for operating, maintaining, and upgrading the aircraft, not the initial development cost. The actual development cost is closer to $400 billion spread across many years with the aircraft’s production and operational costs much lower.
The US pulled the plug on the NGAD because it was going to cost nearly half a billion dollars per plane, an absurd proposition even for a Treasury that can print dollars out of thin air.
The Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program is not dead but in fact it’s being actively developed. The USAF has already initiated prototypes and plans to replace the F-22 with a new generation of aircraft. It may appear "dead" to you but if you could see the budgets and the allotments, it is very much still alive with shekels flowing. The cost issues you mention are based on initial estimates and the complexities of cutting-edge military R&D. It’s standard in high-tech military programs to face budgetary revisions and constraints. The US military has long-term investments in new technologies like hypersonics, AI-enhanced drones, and autonomous systems, which is not a sign of military decay, but rather a shift towards more complex and versatile systems.
and yes, the Chinese will build their Gen5/6 jets for well under $100 mill apiece. Korea sells their KF-21 stealth fighter for $70 million, and the Chinese are even better at keeping costs low.
China's aircraft production has indeed enlarged but their aircraft still lack the advanced electronic warfare systems, sensor fusion, and long-range combat capabilities found in the F-35 or F-22. Building planes cheaply doesn’t necessarily mean the plane is effective. You need to also consider the quality of components, long-term reliability, and operational versatility.
This is one of your many Boomer moments from the post above, you are completely disconnected with reality, it's as if you still live in 1989 and you've typed your mega-post above on a 386 PC wearing a Members Only jacket.
You claim that China is dominating the EV industry but do you realize the reason for this dominance isn’t because of exceptional Chinese innovation but because the West exported manufacturing jobs and technologies to China while crippling its own manufacturing sector? Do you know why China can produce EVs at scale? Because Western companies like General Motors, Volkswagen, and Ford set up shop there, handing over their designs and factories to China in exchange for cheaper labor and government subsidies. Now that China has taken those designs and scaled them, the West is paying the price for its own blind globalist policies.
Same with the missiles. The so-called Chinese advantage is simply their ability to copy, scale, and deploy Western technologies with the help of globalist investors and military-civil fusion policies.
Ultimately none of these technological pissing contests matter because the frame is wrong. All nations are "progressing" in bad faith away from how man was meant to live.
Look, the point here is not to **** on the US and praise China, that's where you want to frame this debate in order to invoke a completely misplaced and shortsighted patriotism. The point here is that China, and Russia, are well-run countries that are on the rise, and whose people like their rulers and feel good about their future - the opposite of every western country.
We're run by oligarchs who hate us and treat their people like cattle who they squeeze to the last drop in a modern type of usury-based serfdom: rampant homelessness and ghettos, student debt, mass migration, shrinking economic opportunities, high taxes and not much in return, disappearing freedom, cultural war against Christianity and nationalism and so forth.
People like those RedNote TikTok refugees are starting to notice, thanks to China, and that is a good thing. The Chinese with their rinky-dink $5.6 million super-program have also single-handedly destroyed the foundation of the techno-feudalists' AI-driven world domination plan . Sam Altman, Larry Ellison and co are reeling and that is a great thing, xie xie China!
Your narrative ignores the fact that the West’s decline isn’t because of incompetence (though now with non-Whites everywhere incompetence is everywhere) but because of treacherous policies that sold out the American people's work to China. Therefore it was, and is, generational by design. Who are the only people we all know who scheme on end for centuries?
You are clearly agitated by pureblooded Aryans who won't fall for these tricks. You see ,there are only two kinds of people in this world who are absolutely completely aware and are capable of playing for dominance on a world scale, one is a jew, and the other is the awakened Aryan. The awakened Aryan does so out of a mutual understanding of his providential role under God to be a steward to return the world to how He wants it, the jew does so out of a demonic creed to rule over everyone else perpetually even if his reign bring ruination and ultimately a dead Earth.
The New World Order is not just some ivy-league Skull & Bones circle jerk, it is a real satanic system of things that will absorb every single culture, race, religion, and dream into one technofeudalist hellscape. The Chinese are not immune to this, if anything the stronger they become materially without a proper guiding light will only make them more susceptible to assimilation at a quicker rate when it begins to take form more rapidly. Just like how the USSR laid the groundwork, the USA, and China will also do their part in building layers of the foundations of this system.
Your intention to discourage the discourse of China's role in the New World Order is pure gatekeeper behavior. Which is why you are the first to begin accusatory remarks about my activities. Why would there be gatekeepers for something like this? To herd the sheep into the right direction which is anti West/anti White Ziggerism/turdworldism. The goal here is to constantly feed anti Western viewpoints repackaged as anti talmudic takes, and by extension steer the crowd towards the next stage of jewish shenanigans which are BRICS, multipolarity, Chinese ascension, and the breakup of America and the dissolution of all Western states into third world-hellholes in the birth pains of the jackboot dawn. These are essential for the New World Order.
You are presented with piles of evidence and a priori dismiss them. That takes extreme conviction, or simply getting paid.
So I will keep exposing how China is facilitating the arrival of the antichrist system, even if they are doing it indirectly, while you keep talking about sensationalism and parasitic technologies. The people, or in the very least the awakened souls will naturally gravitate towards the truth, no matter how grim it looks, how bitter it tastes, and how deep it stings.
