Pouring more quantities of concrete is a superficial metric, a poor per capita comparison. With a population of over 1.4 billion and resources flooded in by the West, I'm sure their concrete jungle is expansive but that is hardly impressive. The real feat is building innovative infrastructure that lasts. Also the numbers show the usage in gigatons, but it is only a comparison of concrete. The US has a lot of structures built with various other materials, and between 1901-2000 didn't have some technofetishist desire of becoming a robotic ant colony.
Notice how in my posts I don't try to raise up the US by shooting down China, I equally criticize them both for various faults that they possess, but you consistently tear down the US time and time again at the expense of China, or Russia. Your hatred for the US is pathological, which I can understand for a Canadian.
This is laughable. These people are not visionaries they are copycats, communists, and faux-nationalists, meaning they are subservient to their "interest" and "holdings" groups when push comes to shove and will not go rogue for the sake of their people.
Yes the US has now been jewed up beyond recognition. Every aspect of its political theater is worse than the 10 plagues. We all know this. That doesn't mean the rest of the world is free of corruption and slavery.
Potentially.
You are beginning to see what I am talking about here, there are problems with both West and East under all the current models, problems that if aren't nipped in the bud will keep perpetuating this grift. However one is not an eternal escape for the other. It's a premeditated pendulum.
We're going to look deeper at China's GDP and their economic success, and all that gold, real and fake, that you love tooting like a horn here. Let's wind the clocks back though, look more at the involvement of the financial elites in China past and present, as a trajectory for this possible future.
China was brought up out of medieval feudal poverty to the modern superpower that is today by the very same jewish financial superpowers that control the US, Britain, France, Russia, etc. In the 1800s Europe was orders of magnitude ahead of China and more advanced in every single possible way. The Chinese territories were stuck in a feudalist society that could not compete with Europe whatsoever during that time. Though what the English bulldogs did for their jewish masters in the Opium Wars was wrong, the numbers show a stark difference in warfare. A force of barely 20,000 British fought off a Chinese mobilization ten times larger than them.
The Sassoons, cousins of the Rothschilds (Red Shields) dominated the economy of China through and through.
This thesis goes into more rarer details about Rothschild involvement in Chinese politics economics, how they bankrolled every gain the CCP made, and gave them the tech from the other western powers:
View attachment 16991
https://is.muni.cz/th/mscxq/Gardas_Thesis.pdf
There is significant involvement with the Rothschilds and China during the 1800s. There also is a gap in documented Rothschild presence between 1912 after the fall of the Empire until the Korean war started to die down in 1953, however the Sassoons (a branch of the Rothschidls) did not depart their influence and control of China during these times.
Standing next to the Sassoon House in Shanghai is the Bank of China building. In its original design it was supposed to have 34 floors which would make it the highest building in the Far East in the 1930s, showing how backwards China was still even in the 30s. Victor Sassoon instructed the Bank of China that any building constructed "next to my house" was not going to be taller than the spire of my building.
(Sassoon House on the left, Bank of China on right)
View attachment 16993
[This is basically Victor Sassoon poking the Chinese Bank telling them that his house will be the tallest and that he owns them:]
View attachment 16994
"The first publicly known interaction between one of the Rothschild family members and the PRC representatives was through Baron Robert Rothschild. However, he was not a direct member of the family’s banking dynasty branch, and neither was he involved in this field. Shortly after the establishment of the PRC, the state found itself involved in the Korean War, lasting from 1950 to 1953, and by then was de facto isolated from the Western financial ecosystem. Its international relations at the time were somewhat limited to the Communist International and particularly the USSR. Right after the war, the situation normalised, and Rothschild’s company “was one of the first Western business institutions to re-establish relations after1953”. (Rothschild & Co, 2020)" - page 56
"In 1953, Rothschilds were amongst the first foreign institutions to re-establish connections with the communist regime after the Korean War, with dealings consisting primarily of gold trading with the Bank of China. Then, the Cultural Revolution, which took place between 1966 and 1976, basically froze the development of this relationship with no new publicly available deals signed during this period. Nevertheless, just a year after the death of Mao Zedong, in 1977, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild personally visited China from his position as head of the family bank and Chairman of The Economist. Subsequently, from 1979 and throughout the 1980s, Rothschilds advised a number of companies, some of which were involved even in the military industry and communication satellites domain. Then, in September 1996, N M Rothschild & Sons Limited signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to develop a jointly financial advisory business in China and internationally. That proved to be a fruitful decision for both parties and tremendous success in the long term, especially after China joined the WTO in 2001." - page 116
The Rothschilds were the king of the gold market, they owned the mines, they owned the distribution, they set the prices. Most of the records for the dealings that the Rothschilds engaged in with the Chinese are not publicly available, that is why we cannot find them so easily. What we see publicly available is the tip of the iceberg. They helped China build up their military, their espionage capabilities, allowing them to *compete* with the other powers. China did not do this on their own, as an advanced superpower today only got there because of this kind of help. The question you should be asking yourself is why?
If these international financiers who have been the power behind the thrones in the west for more than 2 centuries now, why would they build China's capabilities up to this extent, if they did not have control? Bankers work in private. Politicians (mostly) work in public. This fosters the illusion that politicians are the drivers of history, since their words, deeds, and records are accessible.
These
"Memorandums of Understanding" mentioned above (link:
https://www.rothschildarchive.org/exhibitions/timeline/ ) basically bring in the Rothschild Bank and Goldman Sachs and give them full strategic control over Chinese banks.
"In the years following the PRC's accession to the WTO, Rothschilds started to be openly involved in more and more enterprises, mainly through their renowned financial advisory services, as well as various investment activities, joint ventures with Chinese banks, and many more. Several of these interactions represented cutting-edge deals in their respective fields. Apart from their banking and financial activities, which indeed play a dominant role, Rothschilds participated in numerous other realms, such as wine business, weather forecasting, coal and oil industry, or power cord manufacturing. One of the Rothschilds' prevailing activities in the 21st century is the financial advisory, particularly on mergers and acquisitions, both domestic and cross-border. The aggregated volume of these deals has clearly reached hundreds of billions of dollars, though the precise sum cannot be estimated as not all transactions have their detailed records publicly available." - page 117
You cannot dust for fingerprints anywhere in finance in the world without finding the Rothschilds involved. Once again we plebes are limited by only what is "publicly" available.
"The thesis has demonstrated that Rothschilds helped Chinese enterprises acquire a long list of companies in Europe and the United States, some of which made it to the news headlines and were widely discussed. To name just a few, Rothschild & Co advised on Geely's acquisition of Volvo in 2010 or Chem China's buyout of Italian tiremaker Pirelli in 2015. However, one of the most important individual companies in which both sides joined forces is Alibaba Group. Between 2007 and 2014, Rothschild& Co first helped list its B2B division Alibaba.com on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, then it advised on acquisitions of several US businesses and finally acted as sole financial advisor on the group's listing on the New York Stock Exchange in 2014. At the time, this IPO was the most valuable in history at $25 billion. It is no exaggeration to say that Rothschilds significantly helped Chinese companies in their growth and foreign expansion on several continents, while at the same time reaped enormous profits from this cooperation." - page 117
Then there is the problem of Blackrock and its parent company Blackstone presently doing business and being responsible for a lot of economic activity in China. The same applies to Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.
The idea that in order for someone to engage in financial dealings, exchanges, loans, etc with Blackrock that one must fit into their globohomo leftist feminist worldview is false. A cursory search of "Blackstone" (the parent company of Blackrock) in relation to China here reveals the following:
View attachment 16995
How much more evidence does one need to see how China rose predominantly at the expense of the West because of foreign jewish investors and banks?
The Rothschild Bank and its related affiliates are also directly involved in The Bank of China, The Bank of Qingdao, Querces Ventures, the Chinese Creat Group, CIIC (Group) Company (Chinese: 中实(集团)公司), CEFC China Energy, Edmond de Rothschild in Shanghai, Auster Capital, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), China Netcom, Volvo, Pirelli, China Chengtong Holdings Group, Alibaba Group, the Tanzanian Railway, they are all over the place in every aspect of Chinese development that it would have been absolutely impossible for China to reach the stage of development that they're at without the Rothschilds, without the international jewish financial elites. Not once do you mention these financial groups.
To imagine that China is a legitimate autonomous entity fighting for their own civilization, fighting for their own national identity, without some ulterior motive to the national conflict's that we are seeing, is missing the forest for the trees. The conflicts between entities may be legitimate, but above that, at the higher financial level, these conflicts are staged to advance the world in a certain direction. And every single time, at the top we see the exact same powers that controlling the West also control China, Russia, etc.
If you can admit that the West is controlled by these financial elites, how can you not also admit that China and Russia are controlled by these same financial elites, when they have the same powers, the same ownership, the same influence in China, the Far East, in Eurasia, as they do in the West. It's an incredible blind-spot that some of the dissident right have. It is not a legitimate autonomous rival because clearly this entire conflict is being staged and orchestrated from behind the scenes by the very same people. It is not more free, nowhere is truly free. What is given can be easily taken away.
Everything we see is only the tip of the iceberg.
It really makes no sense to speak in terms of supposedly self-interested nations which happen to be extremely entangled with each other economically and otherwise. The midwit theories trying to justify this point of view are not even remotely convincing. There are no nations anymore.