Nick Fuentes Thread

Of course it does but you figure it out which many have done, many I personally know. Having kids changes you, it's changes your life and what you find to be important and what you need to get done. Just like you like to keep talking about all the "young men" you know "waking up", well I know more than you and they are getting married and starting families.

If you're looking for perfection you will never be happy and never do anything in life.
We already see which is trending, if you want to hold out and not admit you are wrong, that is fine, we will just have to wait and see where things end up. I am confident that multi-cultural "conservatism" is going to lose.
 
It has been entirely feasible for everyone I know. The internet isn't the real world
And it isn't feasible for the people I know. Unless you are assuming they are monsters who inventory their own parents for selfish reasons. And that is the real world, I know these people very well.
 
We already see which is trending, if you want to hold out and not admit you are wrong, that is fine, we will just have to wait and see where things end up. I am confident that multi-cultural "conservatism" is going to lose.

I'm not talking about any of that crap I'm talking about the real world. Get off the internet it's poisoning your brain.
 
The guy who wants to blame all his problems on "boomers" is trying to lecture us about not having enough money for family while pretending to have millions.....quite a bit of irony there. You've done more damage to your country and culture than any boomer, you are the "satanic elites" poster boy, you have done their bidding to the letter. While trying to recruit "young men" to live like him!
 
I'm so happy we had all this effort to provide solutions to a man whose appetite for problem solving is non existent.

Apologies for the thread derail but it proves my point about Nick and the mentality that those deeply attracted to his aura ultimately possess.

You can give someone all the solutions for their problems but when they chose not to follow due to the mountain of excuses you should recognize their desire to wallow in the pit of "stuck"....which is much easier than actually doing something about being stuck
 
I'm so happy we had all this effort to provide solutions to a man whose appetite for problem solving is non existent.

Apologies for the thread derail but it proves my point about Nick and the mentality that those deeply attracted to his aura ultimately possess.

You can give someone all the solutions for their problems but when they chose not to follow due to the mountain of excuses you should recognize their desire to wallow in the pit of "stuck"....which is much easier than actually doing something about being stuck
Okay, lets see who wins, conservatives or the far-right wing. I am confident my side, the far-right wing will win over the next 5 to 10 years all across the west, and not just in the USA. If your conservatives win, then you have won the debate, the people will vote with their feet on this one, and I will be wrong.
 
Of course it depends on where you are in life, and on what social or professional status scale you are, but where are all these women that are worth it to marry in terms of ROI? I don't see it. How is Nick wrong generally speaking?

Marriage and children are a good thing, overall, for most people. The problem is that the rate limiting step in this is old by the time she thinks about it, and rarely actually benefits the man in his real, everyday life.
 
Of course it depends on where you are in life, and on what social or professional status scale you are, but where are all these women that are worth it to marry in terms of ROI? I don't see it. How is Nick wrong generally speaking?

Marriage and children are a good thing, overall, for most people. The problem is that the rate limiting step in this is old by the time she thinks about it, and rarely actually benefits the man in his real, everyday life.

We're not debating women, we're debating the concept of not looking to start a family at all.
 
You can give someone all the solutions for their problems but when they chose not to follow due to the mountain of excuses you should recognize their desire to wallow in the pit of "stuck"....which is much easier than actually doing something about being stuck
Truly, without God we are nothing.

John 15:5
King James Version
5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
 
we're debating the concept of not looking to start a family at all.
You are all, as far as I can see, just reading into it. Since Fuentes is a roman catholic, he can't possibly state that he'd rather not have a family. He is just suggesting that it's not really possible for most (including him). And of course that has to do with propaganda its #1 aim and success, women.
 
You are all, as far as I can see, just reading into it. Since Fuentes is a roman catholic, he can't possibly state that he'd rather not have a family. He is just suggesting that it's not really possible for most (including him). And of course that has to do with propaganda its #1 aim and success, women.
He doesn't even suggest that it's not really possible. Just that it requires putting up with all kinds of nonsense and that it's a gynocratic game rigged against you. He tells young men to do it anyway and frames it as making a sacrifice for your society.
 
The guy who wants to blame all his problems on "boomers" is trying to lecture us about not having enough money for family while pretending to have millions.....quite a bit of irony there. You've done more damage to your country and culture than any boomer, you are the "satanic elites" poster boy, you have done their bidding to the letter. While trying to recruit "young men" to live like him!

I didn’t mind IMT posts at first, but there are so many holes in his story that it’s completely possible that he’s an elaborate troll sent to black pill and sabotage men on the forum.
 
He doesn't even suggest that it's not really possible. Just that it requires putting up with all kinds of nonsense and that it's a gynocratic game rigged against you. He tells young men to do it anyway and frames it as making a sacrifice for your society.
That's what the Andrew smoking guy and that other RC guy would do, but now I think the smoking dude has figured out it's sorta silly to keep telling men to do things that aren't incentivized at all because it's just a universal reality that without a benefit, you aren't going to get an action that loses a ton. In a certain sense you're just asking men to be net losers and hope that they'll respond - not gonna happen. At least smoking guy tries to expose the stupidity of women on that show he uses logic to prove points on. Too bad most people and women don't respond to logic :D

The other reason I'm fundamentally opposed to making that kind of "sacrifice" is that it's not even realistic. Odds are actually that that kind of sacrifice won't even matter. The likelihood is actually quite the opposite, others are trying to convince you to help their situation out, as they are already pot committed. A real helper would be a good father to a young woman and then pair her with an older man. I'm not holding my breath on a father making that kind of "sacrifice". Convenient, isn't it?
 
I didn’t mind IMT posts at first, but there are so many holes in his story that it’s completely possible that he’s an elaborate troll sent to black pill and sabotage men on the forum.
I just think we have a spectrum of guys on the forum that are outspoken, as we are all similar to that personality, and some are closer to the black pill side, and others are closer to the "I have a family and just want other guys to shut up" side.
 
You are all, as far as I can see, just reading into it. Since Fuentes is a roman catholic, he can't possibly state that he'd rather not have a family. He is just suggesting that it's not really possible for most (including him). And of course that has to do with propaganda its #1 aim and success, women.

For someone to say they are waiting to meet a good girl or they are waiting until they are more financially stable before they decide to start a family is understandable. I may not agree with the scale of difficulty of those things with many here but still those are legitimate things.

For someone to claim to be highly successful and also claim to have good woman crawling all over him while still using those things as excuses as to why they didn't start a family is an entirely different situation.
 
Last edited:
For someone to say they are waiting to meet a good girl or they are waiting until they are more financially stable before they decide to start a family is understandable. I may not agree with the scale of difficulty of those things with many here but still those are legitimate things.

For someone to claim to be high successful and also claim to have good woman crawling all over him while still using those things as excuses as to why they didn't start a family is an entirely different situation.
I said yesterday, and I will say it again, I consider myself poor. The only way you are not poor, in my book, is when you have enough to not have to work and depend on other men to make end's meat.
 
Back
Top