One of my college professors' favorite talking points was that the obesity epidemic in "underprivileged" neighborhoods was due to the lack of quality supermarket chains, turning them into "food deserts." It was always kind of funny how the upscale (exorbitantly priced) supermarket chains like pre-Amazon Whole Foods (nowadays it would be something like Los Angeles' Erewhon) paid lip service to that idea but never really put their money where their mouth is: they are invariably located in liberal, affluent, predominantly white (or Asian) locales.
Actually, that's not entirely true. Whole Foods tried to serve less affluent cities with its slightly more affordable "Whole Foods 365" stores. They closed them down after 2 years. I wonder why?
There is no such thing as a "cheaper Whole Foods"
www.eater.com