Maybe need a Con Inc. grifter thread for all the "based" Con Inc. phonies who are on TV and pushed by Con Inc.
Warning, cursing in the video!
Warning, cursing in the video!
GOP Thread
- Thread starter Rainy
- Start date
Even “traditional” women see a man who doesn’t fornicate as undesirable.
Imagine still thinking that voting will change anything.
Why doesn't she make the case in court? What is the point to making this public? She seems completely nuts.
Attention whore.
Thomas More
Heirloom
Pretty much if you are allowed on TV or Youtube, you are not to be trusted. Most the guys, who can be trusted, even have interviews. where they are not the host, removed from Youtube.
I'd known you could count the real Republicans in congress on your fingers, but after the stolen election only maybe five senators objected, but many representatives did, how many really meant it is another question. But not filing complaints in court against the Biden admin's EOs is an indictment in itself. Were there no republican judges there to halt the invasion. But if whites had been voting as consistently for the GOP, as blacks and hispanics for the dems, it would be a much more effective party.
Why do you think the GOP would be more effective? They have complete power now and have done nothing in 5 months, but pass a Biden era budget, continue the endless wars, allow the third world immigration to continue, done nothing to address healthcare costs or the destruction of the Middle Class.
They had full power from 2017 to 2019 and did nothing. They are doing what they always do and filling their role as the guys meant to lose, but ah shucks, we will get them next time.
This is why they love "democracy". They control all the levers and allow the people to think they are in control, that their vote matters, and if only more people would "wake up" they could still fix the country from within the system. Even Nick Fuentes thought this was true until a few years go. The real high intelligence guys were saying years ago he could never infiltrate the GOP and change it from within, because the GOP doesn't exist, it is just a proxy party to lose elections or get nothing done, while the clock is run out and third world immigration destroys the west for good.
Last edited:
No way to know for sure, I'm not completely aware what big and small issues each party stood for historically.
There must be consistent support, over many decades, the kind that emboldens you and gives you the reassurance to implement radical changes without fear of future reversals by your political opponents. You can speak your mind- unafraid that mere tough talk will scare some people away- and get positive feedback from voters, you drift to the right ever more, and no matter what the economy does, whether it cools down or overheats and some sectors go bust, you can count on reliable support, the cries of Democrats and their propaganda notwithstanding. You get a soft dictatorship in effect, if some politicians are not up to par they are challenged and replaced, but voters cannot run to the other side of the boat abandoning the main camp. This is why the GOP has no teeth now.
With blacks and browns you get one party rule, they're on the same page because they're mostly dumber. Jews are on the same (morally and ethically wrong) page, because it serves them well, and they're smarter on average- they work with their heads- 'an ounce of trade is better than a pound of work', was the motto Poles used to ascribe to them, 'a Jew won't cheat another Jew' is another one. Whites are in between in brain power, but also the least racist, so they're divided. I would like to see them be consistently ethnocentric, pro business, and anti union- I don't like parasitism, I can sympathize, but when politicians want to help you, they want to help themselves much more, and their real invisible constituents the most. The brighter Poles in the US are maybe 3 out of 4 Republican, the low IQ working class is probably 75% democrat. Trump said 84% of the Polish people voted for him this time, however that was in reaction to how bad things had gotten under Biden- the dumb usually don't notice that anything is wrong, until the water is so high it's pouring into their ears.
The bishop of my current diocese switched his party registration to Republican in the early 80's, when Democrats publicly embraced the gay movement. Party position with respect to abortion didn't run along a clear cut, dividing line untill then, it varied from politician to politician. Personally, I would never vote for FDR, Truman, Kennedy, or Carter, and so on.
In my ideal world, nobody could be a politician without major professional or business accomplishments, but no lawyers ever, no lobbying. Like Cincinnattus, politics would be their side venture. It's laughable in general- are senators really there, by definition, to keep cranking out new laws in perpetuity without a limit, how many laws does a country need? OK, the game of life needs rules, the focus should be on repealing laws too.
I remember Jim Rogers said, in the age of secure communication, parliament members should live at home, among the people (he must have been talking about it in the 1980's already). So that anytime, anybody could go talk to them, and see all the lobbyists hanging around. I thought it would have been better if people voted themselves, but not everybody; yet trying to restrict voting rights for half of the population or more, you'd get a revolt now if they're not born into a system like that. A dictator then looks like the better option. It's all theoretical, much too late now, only government bankruptcy can stop the corruption and cure the distortions.
There must be consistent support, over many decades, the kind that emboldens you and gives you the reassurance to implement radical changes without fear of future reversals by your political opponents. You can speak your mind- unafraid that mere tough talk will scare some people away- and get positive feedback from voters, you drift to the right ever more, and no matter what the economy does, whether it cools down or overheats and some sectors go bust, you can count on reliable support, the cries of Democrats and their propaganda notwithstanding. You get a soft dictatorship in effect, if some politicians are not up to par they are challenged and replaced, but voters cannot run to the other side of the boat abandoning the main camp. This is why the GOP has no teeth now.
With blacks and browns you get one party rule, they're on the same page because they're mostly dumber. Jews are on the same (morally and ethically wrong) page, because it serves them well, and they're smarter on average- they work with their heads- 'an ounce of trade is better than a pound of work', was the motto Poles used to ascribe to them, 'a Jew won't cheat another Jew' is another one. Whites are in between in brain power, but also the least racist, so they're divided. I would like to see them be consistently ethnocentric, pro business, and anti union- I don't like parasitism, I can sympathize, but when politicians want to help you, they want to help themselves much more, and their real invisible constituents the most. The brighter Poles in the US are maybe 3 out of 4 Republican, the low IQ working class is probably 75% democrat. Trump said 84% of the Polish people voted for him this time, however that was in reaction to how bad things had gotten under Biden- the dumb usually don't notice that anything is wrong, until the water is so high it's pouring into their ears.
The bishop of my current diocese switched his party registration to Republican in the early 80's, when Democrats publicly embraced the gay movement. Party position with respect to abortion didn't run along a clear cut, dividing line untill then, it varied from politician to politician. Personally, I would never vote for FDR, Truman, Kennedy, or Carter, and so on.
In my ideal world, nobody could be a politician without major professional or business accomplishments, but no lawyers ever, no lobbying. Like Cincinnattus, politics would be their side venture. It's laughable in general- are senators really there, by definition, to keep cranking out new laws in perpetuity without a limit, how many laws does a country need? OK, the game of life needs rules, the focus should be on repealing laws too.
I remember Jim Rogers said, in the age of secure communication, parliament members should live at home, among the people (he must have been talking about it in the 1980's already). So that anytime, anybody could go talk to them, and see all the lobbyists hanging around. I thought it would have been better if people voted themselves, but not everybody; yet trying to restrict voting rights for half of the population or more, you'd get a revolt now if they're not born into a system like that. A dictator then looks like the better option. It's all theoretical, much too late now, only government bankruptcy can stop the corruption and cure the distortions.
Voting will change nothing and it will not buy you one more second. I knew this back in 2017 because my source of information is accurate.
Let me give you some history then so you understand that voting will change nothing and almost every single politician is just a puppet of the satanic elites.
In college, in 1999, I had a business class and the professor had an assignment that blew my mind. We were to look up the largest corporate sponsors for the 1996 presidential election. I was interested to find out which corporations supported my views (at the time I was a GOP supporter) v. those who supported the opposite side. The class was dismayed to find out the list for each candidate was nearly identical. The corporations don't care who wins, they just care that whomever wins gives them the deals they desire to make record profits. So, they nearly equally donated to both candidates.
You ask, why didn't Whtie people always support the GOP. Because when this country was 90% White, the script was to get higher end professional and small business owner Whites to vote GOP and see the blue collar/union Whites as the problem, when they voted DNC. In the south the DNC was more conservative, and the GOP was the party of civil rights. It was White v. White, based on socioeconomic classes.
As the country became less White over time, the DNC switched away from unions and the working man and started to focus on race. It was a process over many years, check out Bill Clinton stump speeches from 1992 v. Obama in 2012 and the difference is pretty big, but it was a gradual change over this time.
Now the GOP is DeFacto the White party, getting around 60% of the White vote. But the GOP does nothing for Whites, so the numbers never get too high to give them a full rule. They did get a full rule over DC right now and nothing is being done that is any different than had Kamala won. Very same budget, same anti-White immigration and policies, same wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, same spying on US citizens, same destruction of small business, same inflation issues, everything is identical, the election changed nothing.
But yes, you do have the mentally ill Whites who vote DNC. Again, not that is matters who wins the elections, as nothing changes, but your argument is that if these Whites voted GOP the GOP would do something better, which is false because the GOP is owned by Wall Street/AIPAC and has a script to follow. Yes, these Whites are spiteful mutants, ugly women and weak men who would not normally survive or reproduce without super advances in food and medicine. Yes, this issue must be addressed. But it is not these spiteful mutants who pour trillions of dollars into elections every 4 years to get endless wars, endless immigration, and the destruction of the middle class. And until this is fixed, nothing is going to change.
It brings up an interesting point that (besides the issue of women) is sorta the point of the forum: to be or not to be FOR CREATIVE DESTRUCTION.
Being less evil, the Republicans preserve some things and aren't totally chaotic. As we have seen, laws can absolutely be that way for all of us if the Dems have power. Having said that, the slouching to Gomorrah just continues. The only real change will then be if the collapse happens and some real leadership comes. I still have reservations about that, mostly now that women are cooked for me in this generation and the next 1.5 as well, so I have to go overseas for anything anyway. If the system continues, while I don't applaud it, I have an edge. Note that I don't encourage it to continue at all, I just realize I've tried to tell other people and it doesn't matter what I say, or do, so I started to just preserve my own so I could help myself and those around me in the coming years.