Kind of weird how Hasina is suddenly framed as politically opposed to US machinations in the region. Not congruent with reality at all. Google searches on
'US aid to Bangladesh' and
'Hasina official visit where' show how unaligned this talking point is with the nuances of the real world.
For those unwilling to use Google, here is the website of USAID, which is a known de facto US intel asset, claiming a strong
'a strong friendship' with Bangladesh. The website also states that Bangladesh is
'the largest recipient of USAID in Asia'. As for the 23 official visits made by Hasina since 2018 (have to draw the line somewhere), 11 were made to NATO members (UK, USA, Spain, Canada, Australia, Germany, Finland), 6 to regional NATO aligned/ neutral counties like Japan, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, the Maldives and Brunei, 3 official visits were made to India, 2 to China and 1 to Azerbaijan.
Interesting addendum: much of the US aid to the Rohingyas - the weaponized Muslim minority in Myanmar's Arakhan province, has been coming through Bangladesh too. Around 2 billion USD since 2017.
The United States has long shared a strong friendship with Bangladesh since the country’s independence. It is a partnership driven by common interests that also recognizes Bangladesh as a key U.S. strategic partner in South Asia.
www.usaid.gov
To add some more counterweight to the one sided posting here on Sheikh Rasina, during her reign Sheikh Hasina has syphoned off more than 63 billion USD which was subsequently moved out of the country, mostly to Swiss bank accounts. Her cronies added another 90 billion to that tally according to the report below.
Those who were involved in stealing funds from the country must be held accountable.
www.thedailystar.net
More than anything else Sheikh Hasina represents third world cronyism, endemic corruption, tyranny, and shameless political opportunism. It's money politics first and foremost, and geopolitics-wise they are willing to work with anyone as long as there is a commission involved. Ideology or moral convictions don't play a role. Domestically anyone that opposed her was met with bullets, the latest round of genuine protestors angry with the country's neo-feudal systems were immediately dubbed 'bandits and miscreants'. A shoot-on-sight policy was almost immediately ordered by Hasina.
Sheikh Hasina is part of Bangladesh's main political dynasty, as her father Mujibur Rahman is Bangladesh's founding father and the former leader of the Awami League. Her family ties are equally indicative of her multivector foreign policy. Sheikh Hasina's sister is a UK citizen. Sheikh Hasina's cousin, Tullip Siddiq, is the current UK Economic Secretary to the Treasury and City Minister. Her daughter, Saima Wazed, is the head of the WHO in South Asia and resides in India and NYC. Her son Sajeeb Wazed studied and lived in the USA for more than 20 years. His wife and daughter are both US citizens, though he denies being a US citizen.
Long story short, Hasina never opposed US influence in Bangladesh or did anything to curtail it. NGOs could register as long as they were willing to pay up. Same for official US agencies - as long as there was a kickback Hasina was ready to play ball.
I don't see many indicators of this being a color revolution at all. Especially not when looking at the outward manifestations of the protests. In general color revolutions share certain characteristics that make it rather easy to identify them. Color revolutions, for instance, are extremely media savvy. The designers are good at optics and have a clear message and certain charisma to mostly younger people at home and abroad. Signage is in English and pre-printed, a bright color gets picked to identify and slick (and often attractive) media savvy youngsters are made the faces of the movement.
When we look at Bangladesh there is none of that. Hardly any pre-printed signage in English, no appeal to foreign media (who here knew this has been going on for 3 weeks already) no slick media campaign, no bubbly bright color, no good looking faces of the revolution, etc.
The first photo is from the 2014 Sunflower Revolution in Taiwan. The second picture is from Myanmar, 2022. Both clear color revolutions. The third photo is Bangladesh 2024.
View attachment 11212View attachment 11214View attachment 11213
Likewise I don't expect Bangladesh to make any major changes on the grand chessboard. The US probably will improve its position in the country but only slightly. Bangladesh is not suddenly going to opt out of Chinese real estate projects, sign its ports away to the US, cancel Russian grain deals or review its current non-aligned status - just like Pakistan didn't when upstart Imran Khan got capped by the military, even though much of the alt media predicted as much. The only clear loser in all of this will be India but that is at best a regional affair and has a different root cause.