Elon Musk Thread

[john_Jea]

What do mean opposed to? They’re rich.

I disagree, it's not because they are rich.

It's because they are immigrants, liberal and/or jewish. Now they've taken MAGA over and are wearing it as a skin suit, people are falling for it that was my original point.

 

[john_Jea]

Here is a nice chart of how Elon and these new characters connect into the larger political sphere.
It's very interesting to look into these people further.

 

[Mr Freedom]

H1B Visa's are all part of the Zio plan to replace White people with more loyal slaves from India

If you look online (especially on twitter) where do the most unapologetic (& down right embarrassing suck ups) of Israel come from? Yeah that's right - Hindu India.

Zionists have been allies with the Hindu's for years. I beleive oppenheimer quoted the Veda's before the final test of the Manhattan project & Israel founder Ben Gurion had some weird obsession with religion from South Asia as well.

All part of the Zio Satanic plan.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Way too early. The Chinese are playing the long game. They can sit and wait while their technology advances to the point they barely have to lift a finger to send millions of drones to wipe out whomever they desire. China is in no hurry, China has a bright future for their own people v. what the rest of the world has. The longer China waits, the better.

With India's population, it might be easier for China to leave it alone, like they likely would do with Russia due to their size and advanced technology, and just go after the soon to be third world west.

The problem with the Chinese long game is their population replacement rate sucks.

Mark Steyn annotated that in his books Armageddon Doomsday and America Alone.

They'll run out of women and procreative capacity and are soon to be a civilization in decline.

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/07/china-population-shrink-60-years-world/

Decline in China’s Population

The One-child policy, introduced in 1980, restricted couples to having only one child. The "Later, longer, and fewer" slogan encouraged delayed marriage, longer gaps in children and fewer children.

www.pmfias.com

 

[Bizet]

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The problem with the Chinese long game is their population replacement rate sucks.

Mark Steyn annotated that in his books Armageddon Doomsday and America Alone.

They'll run out of women and procreative capacity and are soon to be a civilization in decline.

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/07/china-population-shrink-60-years-world/

Decline in China’s Population

The One-child policy, introduced in 1980, restricted couples to having only one child. The "Later, longer, and fewer" slogan encouraged delayed marriage, longer gaps in children and fewer children.

www.pmfias.com

Their one child policy, and then aborting female babies has lead to a disaster. At the same time, the Chinese will happily have 5 kids apiece if they are told to do so by the govt. If they have more land to expand to, they will up the child production.

I asked a Chinese person why China had so many people and then had to force a one child policy. She said that when Mao took over, he demanded the people have lots of kids to fight to coming war with the west. So, back in the 1950's, they were having 4 and 5 kids per family. They had to go the opposite direction. The Chinese, will simply do as told, they don't seem to even understand the enjoyment of life, as much as the desire to fit in.

 

[Droughtmeat]

Their one child policy, and then aborting female babies has lead to a disaster. At the same time, the Chinese will happily have 5 kids apiece if they are told to do so by the govt. If they have more land to expand to, they will up the child production.

I asked a Chinese person why China had so many people and then had to force a one child policy. She said that when Mao took over, he demanded the people have lots of kids to fight to coming war with the west. So, back in the 1950's, they were having 4 and 5 kids per family. They had to go the opposite direction. The Chinese, will simply do as told, they don't seem to even understand the enjoyment of life, as much as the desire to fit in.

yep, it all looks very much controlled. They can seemingly adjust their demographics according to the country's future needs

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Their one child policy, and then aborting female babies has lead to a disaster. At the same time, the Chinese will happily have 5 kids apiece if they are told to do so by the govt. If they have more land to expand to, they will up the child production.

I asked a Chinese person why China had so many people and then had to force a one child policy. She said that when Mao took over, he demanded the people have lots of kids to fight to coming war with the west. So, back in the 1950's, they were having 4 and 5 kids per family. They had to go the opposite direction. The Chinese, will simply do as told, they don't seem to even understand the enjoyment of life, as much as the desire to fit in.

Except there has not been a case in history I am aware of where by a population recovers EVER after going below the 2.1 children per couple rate.

From his book America Alone:

For instance, the population of Americans between the ages of 15 and 64 will grow by 42 percent between 2000 and 2050. In China, membership in that working-age group will decline by 10 percent. It?s even worse for Japan: a 44-percent drop.

Again that's outlined by Mark Steyn and revisited again.

China's Demographics Crisis Could Mean No Superpower Status

A nation and its attendant economy are only as strong and great as its population base. A key factor undergirding that population is a nation’s total fertility rate. And China is one of the leading nations in the fertility collapse. In fact, it has long been speculated that China is slated “to...

nationalinterest.org

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Except there has not been a case in history I am aware of where by a population recovers EVER after going below the 2.1 children per couple rate.

From his book America Alone:

For instance, the population of Americans between the ages of 15 and 64 will grow by 42 percent between 2000 and 2050. In China, membership in that working-age group will decline by 10 percent. It?s even worse for Japan: a 44-percent drop.

Again that's outlined by Mark Steyn and revisited again.

China's Demographics Crisis Could Mean No Superpower Status

A nation and its attendant economy are only as strong and great as its population base. A key factor undergirding that population is a nation’s total fertility rate. And China is one of the leading nations in the fertility collapse. In fact, it has long been speculated that China is slated “to...

nationalinterest.org

There probably hasn't been, but at the same time, 99% of all humans who lived, lived before the advent of modern technology and medicine, or live in places where it isn't available even to this day.

China has these things and a super obedient society that keeps their women in their feminine role as much as possible. If the Chinese govt. decides to persuade their people to have more children, their people will rush like ants to go out and create as many children as they can afford. They don't have the ills of modern society preventing their women from having kids, they just have too many people on too little land. That will be solved when they take more land.

 

[Kiwi]

Here is a nice chart of how Elon and these new characters connect into the larger political sphere.
It's very interesting to look into these people further.




View attachment 16073

Some of these names have a very distinct sound to them. It's not about a random time that they show up, it's more consistent than that. Like, it's a common thread, almost a pattern you tend to see.

Each. Unaccompanied. Moment. That's all i'm going to say.

 

[Samseau]

Here is a nice chart of how Elon and these new characters connect into the larger political sphere.
It's very interesting to look into these people further.




View attachment 16073

This isn't a deep list, these are just the public names. I'm 100% sure there are much bigger players behind Soros no one has ever heard of.

 

[Bizet]

 

[Northern Pilgrim]

They don't have the ills of modern society preventing their women from having kids, they just have too many people on too little land. That will be solved when they take more land.

Have you heard of 'ghost cities'? Overpopulation is a globalist myth bro, even in China.
Did you even read what Choppa sent? Their population is going to decline in the coming years either way.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Have you heard of 'ghost cities'? Overpopulation is a globalist myth bro, even in China.
Did you even read what Choppa sent? Their population is going to decline in the coming years either way.

Yes, the purpose of the ghost cities is unknown, one is a too scale replica of Paris. Is that to store French people in a zoo like exhibit after they take the land? No one knows why they built it and left it empty.

The biggest issue is the low IQ population exploding. They are literally destroying the planet.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

A certified real genius on fraud Musk and fraud Vivek…

 

[budoslavic]

A certified real genius on fraud Musk and fraud Vivek…

In the future, please add the full text to a long post. Below is the full text for the above mentioned Langan's tweet.

It looks like there's been a brouhaha regarding H-1B visas and enabling "Team America" to “win” by, if necessary, emptying the Indian subcontinent into the US.

There are several things to bear in mind here.

The majority population of the United States has nothing whatsoever to gain from "AI". The large "stakeholders" of the US corporate-government partnership are its sole beneficiaries, and if there's one thing we know for sure, it is that the fatter these stakeholders get, the faster everyone else wastes away to skin and bones. The US hit its economic peak in the early 1970s, and since then, we've been fed upon by oligarchic banksters and the rest of the world like human blood bags.

The main applications of AI are surveilling and controlling the population. AI has already been thoroughly weaponized against majority Americans, and Americans cannot benefit from jobs given to foreigners or raise families on the associated income.

"Artificial intelligence" is an oxymoron. What techies euphemistically call "AI" is glorified high-power data crunching. There will be no "conscious AI" in the foreseeable future. The industry is up against a theoretical brick wall.

Look at the term "artificial intelligence". It says that AI is about the artificial simulation of the real intelligence that engineers the simulation. Unfortunately, AI cheerleaders make a very common mistake: they swallow their own PR, confuse their simulations with that which is simulated, and snooker themselves with meaningless Turing Tests. "If it looks enough like real intelligence," they gush, "then that's what it is!" But it isn't, and that's why big-tech AI simulation requires whirring, blinking Rube Goldberg contraptions cobbled together with the help of starry-eyed H-1B recipients.

This is not merely a semantic quibble. The point is that we're dealing with two different kinds of process. One is mechanical and comes down to glorified computer programming. The other taps into reality at a deeper level, a level beneath that of computers and computation. There is a mechanically insurmountable barrier between the mechanistic cleverness of AI techies and a true generative system. On the latter, nature has a monopoly, and those who deny it are merely pimping a lucrative illusion for the nefarious ends of fascisto-communistic oligarchs. The oligarchs are the problem and always have been.

Human intelligence occupies a level of existence without which computers and computation would not themselves exist. The transhumanist conflation of data-crunching hardware and software with human minds is misleading and a very dangerous path to tread. Let's be honest: even if AI techies forget to mention this out of sheer ignorance (and at best that's what it is), it's deceitful to conceal this fact from investors and the general public by pretending to know otherwise. Research into AI should continue, but the application-and-monetization phase has been prematurely and dangerously accelerated.

India is very dissimilar to the United States. By all accounts, the US is a joke in India; America, its history and culture, and its majority (White) population are subject to disdain and derision. The Indians, hard-boiled in centuries of caste discrimination, cultural closure, and economic abuse, neither like nor respect us. One gets the impression that most wouldn’t piss on an American if he/she were knocked down and lit afire in downtown Mumbai. In any case, Indian coders can easily work from India. (Ever hear of Skype, Zoom, or hundreds of other such applications? They're all perfect for the remote employment of coders.)

In discussing this topic, some have suggested (incredibly enough) that America is an inferior culture which perpetuates the mediocrity of its majority population. Hence, it is argued that America should not resist foreign upgrades to the mediocre descendants of its founders. However, a little perspective may prove enlightening. The mean IQ of the White North American majority is close to 100 even after 60 years of cultural deterioration and demoralization by domestic enemies in high places including the education system. In contrast, the mean IQ of India is 76-77, just ten points higher than that of sub-Saharan Africa (66-67).

Even if one questions the relationship between IQ and intelligence, IQ is known to correlate very well with job performance. Low IQ and high-tech society do not work well together, and IQ is up to 80 percent genetic. What rational human being could possibly believe that the US can benefit by encouraging migration from such locations even if it begins with seemingly innocuous H-B1 visas for cheap skilled labor? Yes, there are some very intelligent Indians. But Indians are no less susceptible to identity politics than other US minorities, and identity politics has a way of turning economic migrants into ethnic voting blocs that influence immigration policy to increase their own numbers.

The US is being sabotaged and subverted by the very globalists fattening at the AI trough as they weaponize their proprietary AI technology against the majority White populations of North America and Europe. This is a "good deal" for no one but them, and obscuring this fact is not a responsible option.

As for our problem with the alleged "shortage of skilled labor", it could be made to vanish by means of academic reform. Get rid of DEI, lose the for-profit academic business model, remove greedy Harvard-MBA college administrators and faculty trolls bent on indoctrinating Americans and socially reengineering our once-great nation as prescribed by the Frankfurt School, and restore the emphasis on educating real American citizens in real employable fields including the trades. Economic problems should be addressed at the root level, and this (along with purging the government of globalist prostitutes) is how to do it.

Importing foreigners is just a stopgap meant to distract us from the fact that for going on 60 years now, our nation has been slowly and inexorably strangled by globalist parasites and their gulls, shills, and useful idiots. Let’s not let them fool us to death.

 

[eradicator]

While importing h1b panjeets is a problem, it may be window dressing. I’ve seen enough science fiction films to know that when we get a true Ai that can think for itself and adapt and grow, it will be a problem for humanity.

 

[Giordano Bruno]

 

[Get2choppaaa]

00000999o9

Yes, the purpose of the ghost cities is unknown, one is a too scale replica of Paris. Is that to store French people in a zoo like exhibit after they take the land? No one knows why they built it and left it empty.

The biggest issue is the low IQ population exploding. They are literally destroying the planet.

No. It's not unknown. These are big projects the state forces companies to undertake to maintain work and capital throughput.

They force people to buy additional houses to drive industry and as an investment strategy.

When I was in grad school my professor (married to a Chinese native) was discussion the cultural impact of investing in housing and the Chinese governments focus on the people doing this.

You can buy amazing sky rise apartments and be the only person in the building in some of these facilities.

Central planning does not work in China. It did not work anywhere else.

The Chinese will practice mercantilism and really aggressive trade wars by undercutting American Manufacturing.

But a hot war is not really the concern here.

They (like Russia) have huge demographic issues.

Back to Elon musk...

Heres the guy we need to be looking at in all this. He's the guy who will set the policy for the Trump Admin.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]