I've seen several references to this 80 year thing in recent days. What is the underlying theory behind this? Did something come out recently presenting this 80 year theory?
If I believe correctly it's something like no Jewish state since the temple was destroyed lasts longer than 80 years.I've seen several references to this 80 year thing in recent days. What is the underlying theory behind this? Did something come out recently presenting this 80 year theory?
That's what I thought, although I don't think there have been many jewish states. I thought maybe it also referred to periods where the jews had a strong insider position in other nations' elites.If I believe correctly it's something like no Jewish state since the temple was destroyed lasts longer than 80 years.
I think the founding of the state of Israel in 1948 was the first "jewish" state since the temple was destroyed. Unless we count Khazaria, which lasted for 400+ years. I don't know where this "80 years" thing came from, but it sounds like nice clickbait and easily thrown around. Perhaps there is some obscure Talmudic statement about it...I don't know. Even King David's kingdom only last 40 years.That's what I thought, although I don't think there have been many jewish states. I thought maybe it also referred to periods where the jews had a strong insider position in other nations' elites.
I figured there was probably an article by someone laying out the details. I figure Google is not going to work searching for something like that
I've seen several references to this 80 year thing in recent days. What is the underlying theory behind this? Did something come out recently presenting this 80 year theory?
Surprisingly, Google did deliver. This article is the one I saw referenced on Twitter, and the idea seems to be making the rounds in discussions about the Jews.I think the founding of the state of Israel in 1948 was the first "jewish" state since the temple was destroyed. Unless we count Khazaria, which lasted for 400+ years. I don't know where this "80 years" thing came from, but it sounds like nice clickbait and easily thrown around. Perhaps there is some obscure Talmudic statement about it...I don't know. Even King David's kingdom only last 40 years.
Perhaps it has something to do with the verse in Exodus 34:7? I don't know...I'd have to study this.Surprisingly, Google did deliver. This article is the one I saw referenced on Twitter, and the idea seems to be making the rounds in discussions about the Jews.
EMJ is a borderline-loon. Wouldn't put too much stock into any 80 year theory.I've seen several references to this 80 year thing in recent days. What is the underlying theory behind this? Did something come out recently presenting this 80 year theory?
You definitely can't trust a fortune cookie!EMJ is a borderline-loon. Wouldn't put too much stock into any 80 year theory.
Bannon once had a 75 year cycle of enlightenment and degradation, and how this *had* to mean that Trump was going to win 2020.
These timescales are superstitious nonsense. You would have just as much of a chance at knowing the future from reading a fortune cookie.
I prefer counting the chips in my chocolate chip cookies. I'm sure there's some gematria significance there.You would have just as much of a chance at knowing the future from reading a fortune cookie.
EMJ is a borderline-loon. Wouldn't put too much stock into any 80 year theory.
Bannon once had a 75 year cycle of enlightenment and degradation, and how this *had* to mean that Trump was going to win 2020.
These timescales are superstitious nonsense. You would have just as much of a chance at knowing the future from reading a fortune cookie.
EMJ is in no way a loon.EMJ is a borderline-loon. Wouldn't put too much stock into any 80 year theory.
Bannon once had a 75 year cycle of enlightenment and degradation, and how this *had* to mean that Trump was going to win 2020.
These timescales are superstitious nonsense. You would have just as much of a chance at knowing the future from reading a fortune cookie.
Agreed.That seems like an effective ad to me.