Are they?
View attachment 19015
Have you taken a tritanopia test? Their lamps are quite brown.
This statement misunderstands how recessive genes work. Having a single recessive allele (like for blue eyes) does not mean those traits will manifest in the next generation unless both parents also pass down the same recessive allele. If a child has brown eyes (which are dominant) that means they did
not inherit two copies of a recessive allele for blue eyes so the trait is already lost in them.
This assumes that future generations can "filter out" the non-White genetics simply through intermarriage. However DNA does not work like a sieve where you can selectively remove ancestry. Admixed genes remain part of the individual's lineage even if certain traits appear more European in later generations.
Yes, most people have zero clue how it works, especially the reality of complex trait inheritance.
When two genetically distinct groups mix the offspring inherit a
random combination of genes from both parents. Over multiple generations some traits may persist while others fade but the genetic legacy of admixture remains forever embedded in the DNA. Even if someone "looks White" after several generations of selective breeding, their genome will still carry markers of non-White ancestry.
Bowman’s kids clearly have dominant Indian traits, meaning their genetic expression is heavily influenced by their mother’s ancestry. Even if their descendants
visibly appear lighter-skinned in future generations, their genetic history will never be erased. This is basic Mendelian genetics.
Quite the ideological stance coming from someone who likes to call others ideologues. The scientifically observable and testable truths are that if someone values ethnic continuity, then avoiding racial admixture is necessary as it is
absolutely a permanent alteration, and once mixed, a lineage cannot return to its pre-admixture state.
Christians who defend race-mixing are hypocrites. If you believe race-mixing to be harmless, then you are
rejecting the historic Christian laws of your own faith and embracing modern secularism.
The historical Churches forbade this and only in the last century did the hard scales of pioneering and crusading Europeans become a soft underbelly to be exposed to genetic suicide by jewish pressure.
Both the Church councils and the various laws of Kingdoms and nations actively discriminated on an ethnic basis. The real historical truth is that Christianity was one of the strongest forces in upholding racial purity laws.
In Greco-Roman times, early Christianity, and medieval Europe religious identity was nearly synonymous with one's ethnicity, leading to laws that enforced separation between different religious and ethnic communities. Except in rare instances where melting pots like Judea had multiple races being called by one geographical name in error, everywhere else was very monolithic.
Synod of Elvira (circa 306 AD): The canons from this synod influenced later Eastern Christian practices. Canon 16 explicitly prohibited marriage between Christians and jews, aiming to preserve religious and ethnic purity and prevent the blending of distinct communities.
Theodosian Code (5th Century): Emperor Theodosius I issued laws that prohibited intermarriage between Christians and jews. Specifically in 388 AD, a decree banned such unions reflecting the empire's effort to maintain religious and ethnic boundaries.
Everywhere non-Christians (meaning non-Whites) went, laws sprung up to keep them separated.
Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215) Convoked by Pope Innocent III, this council addressed the treatment of jews and Muslims, mandating that jews and Muslims wear distinctive clothing to prevent social interactions and proximity with Christians "through error." This decree aimed to maintain clear physical separations between these communities and the Christian majority. You think the Church would approve of mixed marriages, especially interfaith.
Following this, in the Kingdom of Hungary (a frontier between the White Europeans and invaders even then), King Andrew II issued the
Oath of Bereg in 1233 influenced by papal legate James of Pecorara. This decree restricted the influence of non-Christians, particularly jews and Muslims (then referred to as Saracens or Ishmaelites) within the kingdom. The provisions were prohibition of public office, distinctive badges, ban on Christian slavery (modern day human trafficking), but more noticeably these two:
-Separation of Settlements: Bishops overseeing dioceses with significant jewish/Muslim populations enforced the segregation of these communities from Christian settlements.
-Interfaith Relations: The oath
explicitly forbade marriages, cohabitation, and even business relationships between Christians and non-Christians. Violators, regardless of their faith or ethnicity, faced severe penalties including property confiscation and lifelong indentured servitude.
The Council of Basel (1434): 15th-century ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic Church explicitly prohibited Christians from marrying or even cohabiting with non-Christians, particularly Muslims and jews. This was a direct racial and religious barrier.
Spanish "Limpieza de Sangre" (Purity of Blood Laws, 15th-18th century): These laws, backed by the Catholic Church, dictated that only those of purely European Christian descent could hold positions of power. Even a trace of non-European blood (especially jewish or Moorish) barred a person from privileges.
Even in Tsarist Russia, the Aryan Russians who were all Orthodox persisted in separation against the growing animism-practicing Asiatics and violent jews until the end.
https://academic.oup.com/past/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pastj/gtae040/7913479?login=false
If anything, Bowman's marriage is more sinister because she did not convert and those children will be tempted to go pray to Shiva when they are older. A Christian marriage is only considered sacramentally valid in the eyes of God and the Church if both parties are baptized. Since Bowman's wife is a Hindu and did not convert their marriage would not meet this standard in Catholic or Orthodox teachings.
Historically the Church would accuse Bowman to be in
apostasy for marrying a Hindu and participating in Hindu wedding rites, which are seen as engaging in idolatry.
View attachment 19016
I've seen so many mixed marriages between Christians and Buddhists/Hindus/jews/etc go sour because the partner did not convert and the kids were spiritually lost, in addition to having the burden of being mixed. Nothing anyone can do about him, his wife, or his kids, the damage is done. Throughout history Christian rulers criminalized this under divine law for good reason.
