The Venezuela Thread

From the Telegram channel Aquila, much has been said already about the US use of low flying choppers in its initial attack wave and how it must have indicated inside help and at least some sort of set up due to neither the operational Venezuelan AD systems and a large number of MANPADS operators distributed (regime loyalists and Venezuelan military alike) not activating at the time of the attack.

According to Aquila this wasn't the case though, US military instead blinded Venezuelan radar and communications systems through use of cyber and EMP attacks, effectively leaving them in the literal dark and unable to properly communicate. The US then attacked several HVTs as both distraction and lightning rod, using the gap to fly their SF guys in, nab Maduro+wife and get out all within an hour.

Khamenei and the rest of the Latino narcos masquerading as presidents won't leave their bunkers after this.

🇺🇲 The Operation which "WAS" not Possible!

Last night’s operation was not simply a case of elite soldiers storming into a foreign country, seizing a target, and extracting him by force.

What the United States demonstrated was its true strategic strength. While rival powers such as Russia and China often emphasize military hardware through large parades and public exercises, America has long understood that wars are not won by numbers and equipment alone.

I can now for the first time ever report that "Operation Absolute Resolve" was a combined advanced cyber warfare and electronic pulse attack (EMP attack) alongside Delta Force incursions. Rather than overwhelming force, the focus was on systemic paralysis—neutralizing communications, navigation, and command-and-control capabilities before conventional forces ever moved.

For a critical window of time (42 mins) to be precise - Venezuela’s electronic infrastructure was effectively blinded. Power, communications, and military coordination were disrupted, leaving defensive systems unable to respond coherently. By the time senior officials realized the scope of what was happening, the operation was already concluding.

This would represent a mission unlike any other—one that prioritized intelligence, technology, and precision over spectacle. It was not about brute force, but about out-thinking the adversary.


 
Last edited:
Hugo Chavez:
Years ago, someone told me: 'They’re going to end up accusing you of being a drug trafficker—you personally—you, Chávez. Not just that the government supports it, or permits it—no, no, no. They’re going to try to apply the Noriega formula to you.'

They’re looking for a way to associate Chávez directly with drug trafficking. And then, anything goes against a ‘drug trafficker president,’ right?





The continuation of the same long-term Neocon agenda, no matter who is the President.


1767527400451.png
 
Last edited:



oYr4LxF.gif
 
But the reality is that this is simply what international power politics looks like, and has always looked like. There is no morality among great powers, nor are there principles. There are only interests and capabilities. One dog or another will always be the biggest and the meanest on the block, and he will do as he pleases to the others, until another dog takes his place. And if you are that big, mean dog, and you don't take advantage of your strength while you have it, you are doing yourself a disservice. It's very easy to disapprove of a lot of the things Trump has been doing lately, but he seems to at least recognize this basic fact of great power politics, for better or worse.
Might does not make right.
We often (understandably) lament the fact that we are ruled over by sociopaths. This used to bother me a great deal when I was younger and more idealistic, until one day I realized that this was simply the nature of power. Sociopaths are attracted to power like moths to a flame, and thus will inevitably acquire it in any system of politics or government, no matter how well-intentioned or designed it may be. Even a hereditary monarchy will ultimately fall prey to this phenomenon, either through gradual subversion by powers coalescing around and behind the throne, or by the overthrow of a weak monarch by a more ruthless and cunning (read: sociopathic) rival.

Indeed, if you actually think about it for awhile, you inevitably conclude that sociopathy is a requirement for those in power. It actually seems to be beneficial, at least as regards international competition, because as I noted in my previous post, morality simply cannot be a factor in international relations. Any nation ruled by idealists would quickly find itself victimized, invaded, and asset-stripped. The feckless, harebrained leadership we see in Canada and the EU (and in most of the Democratic party in the US) exemplify the sort of ruin that happens to a country when its rulers are too idealistic for their own good.

Of course, this model presupposes that the sociopathic elite running a country are actually elites from and of that country. When you have foreign sociopaths running the place, you're in for a world of hurt. But that's when people start noticing.
Venezuela was in no way a threat to US and what you're trying to describe does not legitimize these actions, nor does apply to US as of today.
 
Last edited:
750.000 Venezulian asylum seekers who came to US during Bidens 4 years, who now can go back home once it’s deemed safe.
Caracas has been 'safe' for 2-3 years now. You can now walk the streets at evening with your phone out with small risk of being mugged. New restaurants are opening and operate into the night with people sitting outside. Removing Maduro will not increase safety in Venezuela, I expect a short term rise in crime.
 
Last edited:
So who is actually in charge of Venezuela now? Is the U.S. going to open diplomatic relations with them formally? On a separate note I don't know much about Venezuela but I always thought that most of the nation states in Latin America don't have coherent national identities (no unique ethnicity/language/religion, no existential wars fought that created a shared identity) and just exist due to geographic convenience - does anyone have good resources on Venezuela as a nation state that addresses this? My impression that (perhaps with the exception of Brazil due to Portuguese), the gap in culture/behavior between a 100% indigenous person, an African descendent, and a Spanish descendent would be greater within each Latin American country than the gap between two light skinned Spanish descendants in Guatemala vs. Venezuela. Or am I totally off?

Officially, the power was transferred to VP Delcy Rodriguez who was already sworn in as acting president. The real, hard power however rests in the hands of Vladimir Padrino (military) and Diosdado Cabello (internal security) who either already cut a deal with the US, or they'll do it in the foreseeable future, unless they want to FAFO. But that's most likely only a temporary solution, and in the long term some form of transition of power will have to be negotiated by the US between the chavistas and the opposition.
 
Bingo. This has been going on in one form or another since James Monroe in 1823. Specific administrations like Carter, Clinton, Biden, and Obama let it slide allowing other great powers into our backyard. It's been less than 24 hours since the attack and there have been no further attacks. This seems like even less of an intervention than Granada or Panama under Reagan.

As it says in Ecclesiastes 1:9, " What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun."

https://web.archive.org/web/20140413142145/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=8839 (see question 21 and JFK's answer)


"The Monroe Doctrine means what it has meant since President Monroe and John Quincy Adams enunciated it, and that is that we would oppose a foreign power extending its power to the Western Hemisphere." JFK 1962

"We will deny non-Hemispheric competitors the ability to position forces or other threatening capabilities, or to own or control strategically vital assets, in our Hemisphere." DJT 2025
 
Might does not make right.

Venezuela was in no way a threat to US and what you're trying to describe does not legitimize these actions, nor does apply to US as of today.
Sorry, but I don't want China, Russia, and Iran being the "big dogs" on the global stage.

I know the United States has committed many sins, but I do not believe for one second that if the BRICS nations were in charge the world would be a better place.

I would much rather have a strong and prosperous USA, including it's flaws and all.

I humbly admit I may be wrong. I pray I'm not deceived. May God's will be done.
 
Sorry, but I don't want China, Russia, and Iran being the "big dogs" on the global stage.

I know the United States has committed many sins, but I do not believe for one second that if the BRICS nations were in charge the world would be a better place.

I would much rather have a strong and prosperous USA, including it's flaws and all.

I humbly admit I may be wrong. I pray I'm not deceived. May God's will be done.

The tricky thing with the US is, given the tendency to always switch between democrat and republican governments, there will inevitably be a huge rise in LGBT degeneracy and other forms of satanism throughout the west while the Democrats are in charge, due to the influence and power that the US wields.

Democrats will always make amends for time lost during periods of republican presidency.

That said, while the world would certainly be more based and conservative with Russia and China running the show, I also feel as though there would be less of some of the "good" freedoms people enjoy in the west.




I'm not saying the video isn't real, but I have multiple Venezuelan friends who have travelled home to visit and none have ever complained about shortage of food. Their mom's absolutely spoiled them when they visited, obviously going through great pains financially to do so, since they refused to accept their Euro kids money in return.

A strange video overall.
 
Back
Top