That's disgusting dude.His "wifey" is a shitskin jeet just like his kids, why even discuss such abomination, white race traitor jew plant
Yea Vance looks like a suitable candidate. It also gives them more time to fill that post Trump void.Hopefully Trump wins. Hopefully Vance continues on in 2028.
I can't think of any sources at the moment but I don't consider it a controversial position that Russia, China and Saudi Arabia, each in their own way and for their own interests, boost "environmentalist" movements worldwide.Vance says that Russia sponsors the European renewable energy movement. Does anyone know if there are sources on that?
Vance is remarkably composed, intelligent and well-spoken when compared to the average national politician. He also "gets it" on a lot of issues that Republicans are typically out to lunch on, for example he's very critical of big tech and big business in general when they operate against the interests of the American people. He has all the potential in the world to pick up Trump's mantle and run with it, and the acumen he's shown thus far - still very early in his political career - suggests that he will be extremely effective going forward. The fact that you got bored after listening to him for 20 minutes says more about you than it does about him.I listened to his JRE for almost 20 minutes and then I turned it off due to boredom. I'm not sure what you guys see in this man.
I'm about 2 hours in and I'll add my voice to the chorus of people saying this is better then the Trump interview. I think it's pretty obvious that JD is interested in ideas in a way that Trump isn't and also has an intellectual curiosity that Trump doesn't have.
The days of having a deep-thinker like Vance in the number one spot are long gone, if they ever really existed. The philosopher-king was always a pipe dream when it came to realpolitik. People respond more to pathos than they do to logos, which is why the democrats have come so far so fast. That said, it would be great if Trump would fully utilize Vance in his number two spot, rather than keep him around as a token.
What gives you the impression he's intending to use him as a token. Given the experience he had with Pence, it's clear he sees the difference in-between a token and an effective surrogate this time around.The days of having a deep-thinker like Vance in the number one spot are long gone, if they ever really existed. The philosopher-king was always a pipe dream when it came to realpolitik. People respond more to pathos than they do to logos, which is why the democrats have come so far so fast. That said, it would be great if Trump would fully utilize Vance in his number two spot, rather than keep him around as a token.
Vance is remarkably composed, intelligent and well-spoken when compared to the average national politician. He also "gets it" on a lot of issues that Republicans are typically out to lunch on,
he's very critical of big tech and big business in general when they operate against the interests of the American people.
He has all the potential in the world to pick up Trump's mantle and run with it, and the acumen he's shown thus far - still very early in his political career - suggests that he will be extremely effective going forward.
The fact that you got bored after listening to him for 20 minutes says more about you than it does about him.