I've got no idea who these two are, can you say a few words..
George S. Patton III was an American general, a big inspiration for many men in the US Army, and military men worldwide. He fought in North Africa against Rommel's Afrika Korps, then against Italy in Sardinia, Sicily, and the boot, and later in the eastward push from France into Germany. He was one of the first "truthers" of WW2.
Read The Patton Papers if you can. Or visit the USA's library of congress online to read his diary. All those quotes about Patton where he said "we fought the wrong enemy," and "there is a semitic influence in the press" and "the jews smell so bad I lost my lunch after visiting their synagogue" are from his own letters written to his wife after the war, between May and December 1945. He was the Governor general of Bavaria in Germany after the war and was not punishing the Germans the way that Ike the kike had wanted him to. He let former SS men work alongside his own men and gave them leniency and made the most efficient choices in picking the best men for key positions in government and infrastructure to rebuild Germany.
Despite fighting against Germany, Patton was repentant of that crime. He confessed numerous times that the Germans were the best race left in Europe, that the real enemy was the Soviet Union to where he openly mocked them, and outright pissed off his jewified colleagues who wanted to include them in everything. Patton was likely planning to attack them with his own troops if he succeeded in re-arming the Germans, so he was removed form his position in Bavaria and reassigned. He personally thought he could push the asiatic hordes all the way back to Moscow with just the US 3rd Army, his own troops under his command, and the remaining SS men combined. At his new post his conscience grew weighted and his soul felt sick going forward at the policies of Morgenthau affecting innocent Germans to the benefit of the jews, and he decided to resign rather than retire so that Washington wouldn't be able to keep his voice down with a "gag order". That's when the hits started, first the crash on the road by a couple of criminal GIs who were likely OSS assets, then his recovery in this hospital cut short with a drastic turn 12 days later, where he was most likely assassinated by poison from other OSS assets. With Patton out of the way the phony kangaroo proceedings of Nuremberg had no legitimate opposition.
Anthony C Sutton was an American writer. His work "Wall street and the rise of Hitler" is misleading however. Everyone gets the economics of the Third Reich wrong, which is understandable because it is very confusing for American minds who have been inundated with completely jewified economics since 1913 to understand how a nation of homogeneous racial kin can pull all their resources together and free themselves. Hitler was not funded by American wall street jews. I've posted about Third Reich economics in the WW2 thread if you want to know exactly the breakdown of how they were able to rearm themselves after Versailles. People are so averse to racial discussions of unity, but the truth is that economics becomes a minimal issue when people actually work together to achieve and create something. Only in the fables of the diseased jewish mind are economics a control-factor for behavior and nations and destinies of peoples.
Don't ever mention Anthony C Sutton to people. You shatter their preconceived notions on their current understanding of the world as we know it.
By far the single greatest resource on all counter story narratives (with EMJ a close second IMO) who was never proven to be incorrect on his body of research.
Which works are you referring to?
There is a bit of muddying the waters when you go from Sutton's "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution" to "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler," only the first has credible real evidence that proves the jewish connection of the Schiffs, Warburgs, and Rothschilds in America to Lenin, Trotsky, and the other revolutionaries taking down the Tsar. The second is full of speculative claims that people like fat Alex Jones like to parrot endlessly. When German industry was at the top of its game again due to the NSDAP banning interest rates and creating millions of jobs and public works within the first few years of its governance, of course western industrialists were interested, it was good business to work with the productive German people despite the jewish "boycott". Their contributions were irrelevant, only some Nationalist German industrialists could be considered to have contributed significantly to the resurrected German economy, men like Fritz Thyssen (steel and coal), Gustvav & Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach (armaments and steel), Friedrich Flick (more steel and coal), Emil Kirdorf (even more coal and steel), Carl Bosch (chemicals for hygiene), Carl Friedrich von Siemens (electrical engineering and electronics), Ferdinand Porsche (automotive), Otto Wolff (steel and raw materials). Sutton makes no mention of these men in his book but concocts this fairytale of George Bush's grandfather puppeteering Hitler.
Even Hermann Goering had considerable steel mining connections and created a state-controlled steel production conglomerate that had no influence from the outside.
Sutton does not say that Hitler was a pawn of the west, but he makes the argument that this non-existent western financing of rearmament was part of a plot by the western elites to cause a war to destabilize Europe. This is where truth is melded with a lie. The western elites absolutely wanted nothing but war in Europe, but their ace in the hole was the spread of the USSR and its proxy communist satellites. They did not want a strong mercantilist and well-defended Germany, the only bulwark against communism. Their little revolutions were already causing chaos everywhere. What happened in Spain is pure evidence of this, English bankers were financing the "Republicans" in Spain to chop up priests and burn nuns alive the same way American (((bankers))) did in Russia. Many governmental policies of Hitler and Mussolini explicitly denied access to western plutocrats who were in bed with the jews in Russia.
He also makes little mention of the Polish situation, the truth that the Poles actually declared war on Germany and were shooting Germans and responded to every peace offer with further mobilization because of "assurances" from FDR and Churchill. If the book was titled "Wall Street, FDR, and Empty Promises to dumb Polacks" then it would be more accurate of the events that really took place.
EMJ is nowhere near the level of Sutton, and they're both dead wrong about Germany. Sutton posits that WW2 was complicit by all as actors for an agenda, making Germany an unwitting accomplice, when it really was only one side that were, USA, England, and more covertly, the USSR. No one else wanted war. EMJ thinks the communist-ridden "Catholic" Center Party was a better alternative for Germany to escape Weimar, when they were complicit in perpetuating its state of affairs. He is a disgrace to historians for his boomer bias and kvetching for victimhood. All narratives claiming victimhood are weak and just another flavor of limp-wristed chutzpah.
