Married women is actually worse, considering all things.
The problem is the scare mongering about abuse in a Christian marriage. Sure some people fall through the cracks. And that’s what caused this behavior in women. The are afraid of falling through the cracks. They think husbands were tyrants before 2nd wave feminism.Daddy government is their man, but they'll be sure to remind you they don't need no man.
Or we have the careerists. Their boss and job is like a version of husband and family. Democrats prey on unhappy people. Sad!
It will be interesting to see how collective manhood (or a good section of it) reacts to any crisis and its aftermath.Daddy government is their man, but they'll be sure to remind you they don't need no man.
Or we have the careerists. Their boss and job is like a version of husband and family. Democrats prey on unhappy people. Sad!
There has to be addressing of the idea that traditionalism is not just "I'll have a family" or the supposed desire to want one at some point in the future, but a sincere action on being traditional, meaning having children at a young age and committing to a man giving your youth as part of the deal for marriage. Nothing else matters as there really isn't an incentive for a man to marry unless it's a girl who is younger. In modern life, it's not like "young" is really all that young anymore, either.I don’t see a casual switch to traditionalism as being sufficient.
All of it comes down to there being excess "money" or resources for women in an economy, or not. Fewer men, as I've said, means an economy that is less robust, of course, and a higher F:M ratio, both of which are the only real selection pressures on women (be better looking, be thin, be young).the prognosis looks awful.
Based on all of what is being said, it seems like being around women constantly like you would be doing so in a marriage sounds completely unappealing. It's strange that on the one hand men desire being around a woman so much that plenty of men on this forum are willing to take such big time investment in wanting to go across the world just for the chance of meeting a woman but on the other hand once you do meet a woman, the experiences of interacting with one ranges either from hellish if you end up a deeply combative BPD woman to at best, a submissive one that won't give you a headache but is less interesting to interact with than a pet would be. If this is the case then it seems like the Apostle Paul's advice on marriage is the best way to go.
I realize sex is a big part of the equation but assuming you do get a woman who is willing to satisfy all your needs in that area, what are you going to do with her the rest of the time she is around? You can only have so much sex per day. Even in the case scenario, when you do a cost benefit analysis it doesn't seem worth it.