Mod note. Recent discussions about screening and courting a specific woman were moved here: https://christisking.cc/threads/how...being-formerly-in-game.711/page-2#post-110341
I wrote it in an imprecise and confusing way. The interviewee heard the advice from a priest that was similar to what another user wrote a few pages back- to stay single since female beauty fades with time. Not that I agree or not, the circumstances and details matter. It should be at 1:00:14 hours into the video.I didn't hear that part that he indicates this with your timesteamp.
I see. That's always been the case though. The question is really about what the tradeoff is in modernity. I maintain that in the west, the ROI, while not zero (but only if you put very high value on legacy) is at all time lows. A scattered few other eras may have been close but they are historical anomalies in many ways (ie feminism really wasn't similarly real in other eras, though women ascended in particular societies as they fell).I wrote it in an imprecise and confusing way. The interviewee heard the advice from a priest that was similar to what another user wrote a few pages back- to stay single since female beauty fades with time. Not that I agree or not, the circumstances and details matter. It should be at 1:00:14 hours into the video.
And I'm guessing that about 6 out of 10 women in America now have at least one or two tattoos (if not full sleeves). Maybe these stats are related? I'm seeing a huge increase in women over 50 with new tats too. Very strange. And this whole giant thigh tat thing with these younger broads is just disgusting. What are they thinking?
At the source, "modernity" starts early in childhood - sexualizing little girls.
Barbie never married, had a side affair with Ken.
You couldn't pay me enough to "convate" with her.