Reagan did an amnesty to anti communists right wing immigrants. It was a mistake. But people were already inside US. And i believe he criminalized hiring illegals.
Reagan won. He was a winner. He would wipe the floor with commies.
The China Thread
- Thread starter God's lonely asperger
- Start date
Reagan won. He was a winner. He would wipe the floor with commies.
The way you been writing you seem to have been implying that the west (Or NATO as you said initially) would actually fight to defend against Chinese invasion of random third world countries. Now you are back tracking and saying you are just talking about aid. This is a common issue with you, you'll make some crazy out of this world claim and then when challenged you'll back off when you realize you can't defend your position. "Tel Aviv won't exist - oh well it still only exists because the Iranians are being honorable and backing off" "NATO will defend Vietnam against a Chinese invasion - oh I meant to say the west when I said NATO" " China isn't taking the land of third world nations because white people will fight back - uh by fighting back really meant they'll send big aid packages"
Also a weird part of your logic: China is waiting for the west to become more third world before they attack to take the land since strong countries will take over weak countries yet they won't attack countries that are already third world. There's counties that are already in the sort of condition that you claim the west will be in a few decades yet there's no indications China is building up for an invasion of these countries. Even if we grant your crazy premises to be true and follow your own logic it still doesn't lead to the results you claim are inevitable.
Also to reiterate, the way you have been writing on this forum implies that the west is already too weak to resist China. See your many posts about collapse economies of the west and how Israel/US has already lost to Iran (a country that is way weaker than China) and how Western technology is already ruined from H1B1 engineers and how China has already lapped the US on the technology race.
Reagan was just another puppet and as time moves forward, it is evident what a complete fraud he was. And the "days of Reagan" will never come back with a whole new demographic.
We already fight the Chinese. We spent trillions around the globe attacking Chinese interests economically and via proxy wars.
Are you just not aware of this? Are you in favor of third world immigration into the west? You work so hard to prove a point that most here are already aware is not accurate.
All this talk about Vietnam is triggering repressed memories of my youth. Please provide trigger warnings.
Last edited:
More strange IIMT tier logic: if you don't agree with his strange Sinophile theory of the supreme Han Chinese conquering the glove it somehow means you support third world immigration to the West. For third parties reading this, please note this as an example of mind exhibiting patterns of thought that is typically associated with schizophrenia: seeing strange obscure connections between things that have no actual connection with each other.
Also another example of grandoise IIMT claims getting shrunk down to something more plain when he is confronted: a world war between China and the west that he is claiming is going to happen or is about to happen is now and will result in whole countries being reduced to fertilizer is downgraded to 'well we spend money to mess with them!" If this is the all "NATO" can do to oppose the Chinese doesn't this mean they already are unable to resist the Chinese and therefore we should already see them taking the lands of weaker countries?
As for "You work so hard to prove a point that most here are already aware is not accurate." That applies to you since most of the responses of other posters here about your posts about how China will invade Ireland eventually is them expressing bafflement and asking you to explain how it's supposed to happen and asking for reasons for why it's going to happen with the only reason you can come up with 'the strong country will take the land of weaker countries' which I have shown isn't actually happening.
Last edited:
So, you just refuse to answer both questions. I will let the readers not only decide but think back on this conversation as things in the west continue to crumble and China continues to make technology advances.
I will also ask readers to think about whether there is a logical connection between thinking China isn't going to take over the world and supporting massive third world immigration which I have made clear I don't support despite IIMT claiming I haven't answered the question. I will also point readers to past posts where IIMT claimed China will invade Ireland and when asked how it's going to happen couldn't provide any response beside "strong take weak land" and "more shiny tech in future' and let the reader decide is this is a sign of a stable mind making sober judgements.
Cool, rather than answering two simple questions, you waste your time and energy on this. They will decide as time moves forward, we don't decide for them.
This is true and the bolded is the funniest things I've read in a long time.
Fact- they practice mercantilism and have 2 sets of books. One for the CCP and one for the foreign market
With European colonialism there were benefits for the Africans. From China, not so much.
Last edited by a moderator:
The aliens have been too worried about the Chinese stealing all their spaceship IPs.
Commander Zgiff to his lieutenant : "skip this solar system, Gorff. I heard about these yellow ones, you land there and they will just flood the galactic market!"
"ThE CCP oWns HoLLyWoOd!!
Last edited:
I don't think that is true, for two reasons:
1- The Chinese build infrastructure, their development model is to acquire local natural resources in exchange for turnkey infrastructure projects (roads, dams, powerplants, railways/trains, highways, housing, universities, factories etc).
The ((western)) model is plain usury - send piles of cash to the government for billion dollar loans supposed to go towards building something, or a big project. The money gets pilfered, the country gets saddled with crippling debt, the project doesn't get done. This is by design, as these failed countries have to give away their resources to pay for debt that they need to constantly roll and that can never get rid off, and as long as they stay undeveloped and indebted, they will sell their resources for pennies on the dollar.
2- The Chinese WANT Africa to develop, they want to create a big local consumer market for their cheap appliances, tractors, phones, bikes, cars etc, and they ultimately want to outsource their lower-end manufacturing there using cheap local labor. It's a win-win proposition.
It's a win for Europe too, if those African countries develop, the locals stay put.
Last edited: