There´s no need for smoking guns. They said it themselves:
"I think there is a resurgence of countersemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive." – Barbara Lerner Spectre
This quote just sums up so many stereotypical Jewish traits.
Hubris - the "Europe *WILL* be multicultural. This *WILL* take place. No one, even from the most extreme political viewpoints, ever talks this way. Assuming that your desire (particularly for a FOREIGN people no less!) WILL be done. There is no "I want to influence society so x will happen. No. X is going to happen, because Jews will it. Period.
Chutzpah - Openly telling a people they are going to be, if not exterminated, then weakened and diluted and deracinated to the point where they will have no political, social, or military power. She has no fear of openly telling us she wants to end us. And goes above and beyond the absurd to say Europe will not even SURVIVE unless we flood the place with non-Europeans. Of course that is nonsensical. The most poor and dysfunctional society on earth can survive without immigration. But Europe, as one of the strongest, *needing* immigration is ridiculous.
Crying out in pain as they strike you - Complaining that Jews will be hated and resented, and that they are the real victims here.
Feminism - of course it is an old female Jew who is weilding all this power. It is not Benny Netanyahu telling you this--it is, in the baphometic style, a female with no official position or real political power over us, and yet her wishes are acted upon. It is a humiliation ritual to have an old senile foreign female from another country gloat over how you are going to be crushed. It's like having Joe Bidens wife taunt Russians about how they are going to die in a Ukrainian war.
Subversion - Spectre has positioned herself as a wormtail-like political influencer. Jews subvert.
@Cynllo I would point to Barbara Lerner-Spectre ^^ as one of the most prominent examples, but the best way to answer your question is to tell you to
a) become a pattern recognizer and b) be patient. In a year or so you will suddenly have "noticed" dozens of examples of Jewish influence in immigration and it is, more than any single data point, the combined confirmation bias that you will see over, and over, and over again that Every Single Time when you look into an immigration news story, or research a historical event, that (((they))) are behind it, which will answer that question.
The first time I heard someone be critical of Jewish influence I felt ashamed and thought the guy was a bigot. And then, to quote AH, "Gradually I became to hate them" as I saw for myself, over and over and over how they are the responsible party for basically all our major problems.
Soon, you will see them everywhere and start saying things like "Why was the narrative in the July 2024 presidential debate controlled by 2 Jewish moderators? Wouldn't people be freaking out if it were conducted by two Chinamen?"
So when you ask for a specific point, my brain can readily access perhaps the last one or two news stories, but much more than that is the collective repeated involvement of Jews over immigration (or pornography, or homosexuality, or war or whatever the issue is) much more than any single event.
But here are two examples, one recent event and one historical one:
1) the election of the Jewish president of Mexico, a country that is 90%+ Christian. Now we have two Jews controlling the border between the USA and Mexico: Claudia Sheinbaum and Alejandro Majorkas. Once you start seeing (((Cohencidences))) like this, you start to realize they are involved Every. Single. Time.
And 2) the Hart-Celler immigration act. Prior to 1965, US immigration law allowed only "White men of good character" into the country. Then, Emanuel Celler colluded with Philip Hart to pass the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965:
in 1965, he proposed and steered to passage the
Hart-Celler Act, which
eliminated national origins as a consideration for immigration. This was the culminating moment in Celler's 41-year fight to overcome restriction on immigration to the United States based on national origin.
So we get the system today where it is actually *difficult* for white people to immigrate to the USA and we even have things like the "diversity lottery" where your ONLY qualification is that you are nonwhite, and that gives you entry to the US (I believe you have to also not be a criminal felon).
The pre-1965 system was quite reasonable:
The 1921
Emergency Quota Act restricted immigration to 3% of foreign-born persons of each nationality that resided in the United States in 1910.
The
Immigration Act of 1924, also called the National Origins Act, provided that for three years
the formula would change from 3% to 2% and the basis for the calculation would be the census of 1890 instead of that of 1910. After June 30, 1927,
total immigration from all countries will be limited to 150,000, with allocations by country based upon national origins of inhabitants according to the census of 1920.
It aimed to reduce the overall number of unskilled immigrants, to allow families to re-unite, and to prevent immigration from changing the ethnic distribution of the population.Africans were also subjected to severe restrictions. Immigration from North and South America was not restricted