Tatted Unmarried-Mother Raises $500,000+ By Saying N-Word

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

This is Shiloh Hendrix, stay-at-home mother of two boys, by the same man she's been with for six years, who works hard to support them.

She is white. She is proud. She does not back down.

QUEEN!

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

View attachment Anime giving finger pulsing background.mp4

 

[stadtaffe]

I think it would be good to be neutral and not insert two negative descriptions, one of them false (she is married), into the thread title.

@Samseau do you want to change it back to what it was originally in light of the above

 

[Samseau]

I think it would be good to be neutral and not insert two negative descriptions, one of them false (she is married), into the thread title.

Proof? Where is there a ring? The hand that she uses to flick off in the camera is her right hand. I see no ring.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

Proof? Where is there a ring? The hand that she uses to flick off in the camera is her right hand. I see no ring.

Maybe she doesn't wear her wedding ring outside because it would attract some Somali pedo to try and steal it?

We do not know whether she is married or not, but you seem to be using your assumption that she is not in order to make the title of this thread as negative as possible.

It was reported by Jean-Francois Gariépy, who claimed personal contact with Shiloh on his X acct, that she has been with the same man for six years, and that they have known each other for 10.

It is disappointing to me that in an environment where doxxing is a weapon to destroy people's financial lives, ruin their reputations, and utilized to explicitly sic mobs of psychopathic and homicidal mkultrantifa morons to their white victims, as the Somali pedo filmer and other blacks are doing, that you default to a negative banner and demand proof of marriage, when any personal information given can lead to the harm of a woman and her family.

 

[ginsu]

Every thread about a person has the name of that person as the title for example: douglas murray or candace owens thread, even andrew tate has a respectable name for his thread and its not called bald pimp got rich and succesfull by exploiting vulnerable men and women .

 

[thinkreadwritecode]

I agree, it is inhuman, and therefore, Satanic, to not include the name of this person in the thread title. I would be extra wary of pronouncing judgement on Shiloh Hendrix so casually.

 

[Samseau]

Every thread about a person has the name of that person as the title for example: douglas murray or candace owens thread, even andrew tate has a respectable name for his thread and its not called bald pimp got rich and succesfull by exploiting vulnerable men and women .

I agree, it is inhuman, and therefore, Satanic, to not include the name of this person in the thread title. I would be extra wary of pronouncing judgement on Shiloh Hendrix so casually.

There are dozens of threads about people without their names in the title. The ones with names in the titles are well known celebs or commentators who make a living in the media game and therefore have a well known name.

The thread title is neutral and not judgmental. You two are White knighting.

 

[Samseau]

Maybe she doesn't wear her wedding ring outside because it would attract some Somali pedo to try and steal it?

We do not know whether she is married or not, but you seem to be using your assumption that she is not in order to make the title of this thread as negative as possible.

It was reported by Jean-Francois Gariépy, who claimed personal contact with Shiloh on his X acct, that she has been with the same man for six years, and that they have known each other for 10.

It is disappointing to me that in an environment where doxxing is a weapon to destroy people's financial lives, ruin their reputations, and utilized to explicitly sic mobs of psychopathic and homicidal mkultrantifa morons to their white victims, as the Somali pedo filmer and other blacks are doing, that you default to a negative banner and demand proof of marriage, when any personal information given can lead to the harm of a woman and her family.

Some random twitter post is your proof? And the tweet doesn't even claim she's married. She's not wearing a ring. She's not married. This is how the world works for the last 8000 years, literally since the times of Abraham. If a man wanted to marry a woman he gave her a ring for her finger.

You claim to read the lives of the saints in your username, and yet you celebrate this woman who is obviously beholden to the sin of wrath, posting memes of her in the humor thread like she's a saint? Do you actually read the lives of the saints?

Then you call her a Queen, which is homosexual or jogger language. Why are Whites degenerating down to homo and Black euphuisms to support their women? Yikes.

 

[FrancisK]

Yea I'm with @Samseau, you want to say enough bending over for blacks and their shit behavior, there isn't a word in the english language that should be off limits to selected people.......yea I'm on board 100%.

You want to praise some foul mouthed trashy behavior single mom with a sleeve tattoo who takes selfies in crop tops using her kids as props for attention and charity like she did something noble and stood up for society. No sorry that's one hell of a stretch, we can do better than that......this coming from a guy who sent her 50 bucks because I don't think anyone should be persecuted for using a word, not because I think she did something worthy of praise.

Again if the kid and guy weren't black and people weren't so fed up with blacks then this story would be in the destruction of modern women thread instead, nobody here can deny that. Take it for what it is on the surface and nothing else because it's nothing more.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

Some random twitter post is your proof? And the tweet doesn't even claim she's married.

JF Gariepy is not a random twitter user. He's been around a long time as a white advocate.

She's not wearing a ring. She's not married. This is how the world works for the last 8000 years, literally since the times of Abraham. If a man wanted to marry a woman he gave her a ring for her finger.

No, I think her wedding ring was in the shop getting re-sized after she split her knuckle on some numbskull who had internalized his white guilt to the point that he didn't know which side to take in a fire fight.

You claim to read the lives of the saints in your username, and yet you celebrate this woman who is obviously beholden to the sin of wrath, posting memes of her in the humor thread like she's a saint? Do you actually read the lives of the saints?

I read the Lives of the Saints often, thank God. It's a wonderful resource. One of my favorites stories is about St. James the Faster, who once resisted temptation when curing a maiden by placing his hand in a fire. Later he fell to temptation, raped a girl entrusted to his care, then murdered her in order to cover up the crime.

He then spent 10 years in an open grave, eating whatever grew or crawled nearby and pitying himself, thinking that his sin had damned him. But God had not given up on him and James was visited by a mysterious stranger, who persuaded him to return to the faith, which he did through repentance. Next, a terrible drought came to the region, so people went to St. James for his prayers, which brought rain.

I can imagine you giving St. James your purity treatment at the wrong moment in the timeline and maybe shoveling some dirt onto him in the middle of his tribulations.

Then you call her a Queen, which is homosexual or jogger language. Why are Whites degenerating down to homo and Black euphuisms to support their women? Yikes.

Queen is homosexual jogger language? Source?

 

[Samseau]

No, I think her wedding ring was in the shop getting re-sized after she split her knuckle on some numbskull who had internalized his white guilt to the point that he didn't know which side to take in a fire fight.

I know which side to take, which isn't the side of hypocrisy. Pretending something is righteous when it is in fact shameful is not the Way of Christ.

I read the Lives of the Saints often, thank God. It's a wonderful resource. One of my favorites stories is about St. James the Faster, who once resisted temptation when curing a maiden by placing his hand in a fire. Later he fell to temptation, raped a girl entrusted to his care, then murdered her in order to cover up the crime.

He then spent 10 years in an open grave, eating whatever grew or crawled nearby and pitying himself, thinking that his sin had damned him. But God had not given up on him and James was visited by a mysterious stranger, who persuaded him to return to the faith, which he did through repentance. Next, a terrible drought came to the region, so people went to St. James for his prayers, which brought rain.

I can imagine you giving St. James your purity treatment at the wrong moment in the timeline and maybe shoveling some dirt onto him in the middle of his tribulations.

If St. James was in this woman's position, he'd apologize profusely for swearing at a young boy, potentially turning him into a future racist Black man. He'd probably spend years in the wilderness repenting for his sin understanding that nothing is more important than God's grace.

Meanwhile, this woman is covered in pagan tattoos, raises children outside of marriage, and is angry enough at the world to yell slurs at young boys who don't know any better.

I'm sure she'll be going to Church anytime now to repent.

Queen is homosexual jogger language? Source?

You've never heard of a drag queen? Or queen Latifah?

 

[Samseau]

The other claim that keeps popping up is that the guy who filmed her was a pedo rapist. In reality, he was probably a father of some other children at the park, and he saw a White woman shout racial slurs at a Black boy.

Rather than talk to her like a normal human, he decides to film her in order to do maximum damage, because of tribal instincts on his part, but this does not make him a pedo rapist.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The other claim that keeps popping up is that the guy who filmed her was a pedo rapist. In reality, he was probably a father of some other children at the park, and he saw a White woman shout racial slurs at a Black boy.

Rather than talk to her like a normal human, he decides to film her in order to do maximum damage, because of tribal instincts on his part, but this does not make him a pedo rapist.

The charges were dropped, but not because he was cleared, but due to a legal loophole, but he is on the police radar.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

I know which side to take, which isn't the side of hypocrisy. Pretending something is righteous when it is in fact shameful is not the Way of Christ.

Hey, I wasn't talking about you, but I do think she's feisty enough to do it, tho.

Psalm 115 says every man is a liar and in this context it also means hypocrite, of which we are all guilty, even if we aren't quite as flamboyant about it as a Pharisee.

If St. James was in this woman's position, he'd apologize profusely for swearing at a young boy, potentially turning him into a future racist Black man.

I have seen no evidence that she swore at a young boy. We do not know what that interaction was like, but even if something like that happened, I think extrapolating that into him becoming a racist in the future, when blacks are much more racist than whites regardless, see the chart about in-group preference among races, is projecting current assumptions into an unknowable future with a negative outcome in order to falsely reinforce your current position. IOW, it's whack.

Meanwhile, this woman is covered in pagan tattoos, raises children outside of marriage, and is angry enough at the world to yell slurs at young boys who don't know any better.

Again, there's no evidence in the video or elsewhere that she yelled or used slurs toward the boy.

You've never heard of a drag queen? Or queen Latifah?

So drag queens and a black woman entertainer now own the word queen? Is this not giving the enemy ground?

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

The other claim that keeps popping up is that the guy who filmed her was a pedo rapist. In reality, he was probably a father of some other children at the park, and he saw a White woman shout racial slurs at a Black boy.

Rather than talk to her like a normal human, he decides to film her in order to do maximum damage, because of tribal instincts on his part, but this does not make him a pedo rapist.

Here is the investigator's report with the details of the alleged rape by two men of a minor under the influence and in distress, and summary of the corroborating witness statements. It was eventually dismissed, but this happened.

 

[Thomas More]

The other claim that keeps popping up is that the guy who filmed her was a pedo rapist. In reality, he was probably a father of some other children at the park, and he saw a White woman shout racial slurs at a Black boy.

Rather than talk to her like a normal human, he decides to film her in order to do maximum damage, because of tribal instincts on his part, but this does not make him a pedo rapist.

The guy who took the video was Sharmake Beyle Omar. He was charged with sexual assault of a 16 year old in 2023, but the charges were dropped. The charge was Criminal Sexual Conduct - 3rd Degree, Penetration under 18. The State of MN dropped the charges "in the interests of justice".

If we are to assume the worst of Shiloh Hendrix, it's only fair to assume Omar did it, and the liberal DA dropped the charges because he's black, and they have been letting people get away with everything in recent years.

 

[Samseau]

The charges were dropped, but not because he was cleared, but due to a legal loophole, but he is on the police radar.

How do we know this is the same guy filming?

I have seen no evidence that she swore at a young boy. We do not know what that interaction was like, but even if something like that happened, I think extrapolating that into him becoming a racist in the future, when blacks are much more racist than whites regardless, see the chart about in-group preference among races, is projecting current assumptions into an unknowable future with a negative outcome in order to falsely reinforce your current position. IOW, it's whack.

She admitted to doing so, "Calling him what he was."

So drag queens and a black woman entertainer now own the word queen? Is this not giving the enemy ground?

The word Queen was used for those in ruling political positions. Calling everyday women, who are by all accounts low class and indifferent to their sins, is jogger and homosexual behavior.