Tatted Unmarried-Mother Raises $500,000+ By Saying N-Word

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

This is Shiloh Hendrix, stay-at-home mother of two boys, by the same man she's been with for six years, who works hard to support them.

She is white. She is proud. She does not back down.

QUEEN!

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

View attachment Anime giving finger pulsing background.mp4

 

[stadtaffe]

I think it would be good to be neutral and not insert two negative descriptions, one of them false (she is married), into the thread title.

@Samseau do you want to change it back to what it was originally in light of the above

 

[Samseau]

I think it would be good to be neutral and not insert two negative descriptions, one of them false (she is married), into the thread title.

Proof? Where is there a ring? The hand that she uses to flick off in the camera is her right hand. I see no ring.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

Proof? Where is there a ring? The hand that she uses to flick off in the camera is her right hand. I see no ring.

Maybe she doesn't wear her wedding ring outside because it would attract some Somali pedo to try and steal it?

We do not know whether she is married or not, but you seem to be using your assumption that she is not in order to make the title of this thread as negative as possible.

It was reported by Jean-Francois Gariépy, who claimed personal contact with Shiloh on his X acct, that she has been with the same man for six years, and that they have known each other for 10.

It is disappointing to me that in an environment where doxxing is a weapon to destroy people's financial lives, ruin their reputations, and utilized to explicitly sic mobs of psychopathic and homicidal mkultrantifa morons to their white victims, as the Somali pedo filmer and other blacks are doing, that you default to a negative banner and demand proof of marriage, when any personal information given can lead to the harm of a woman and her family.

 

[ginsu]

Every thread about a person has the name of that person as the title for example: douglas murray or candace owens thread, even andrew tate has a respectable name for his thread and its not called bald pimp got rich and succesfull by exploiting vulnerable men and women .

 

[thinkreadwritecode]

I agree, it is inhuman, and therefore, Satanic, to not include the name of this person in the thread title. I would be extra wary of pronouncing judgement on Shiloh Hendrix so casually.

 

[Samseau]

Every thread about a person has the name of that person as the title for example: douglas murray or candace owens thread, even andrew tate has a respectable name for his thread and its not called bald pimp got rich and succesfull by exploiting vulnerable men and women .

I agree, it is inhuman, and therefore, Satanic, to not include the name of this person in the thread title. I would be extra wary of pronouncing judgement on Shiloh Hendrix so casually.

There are dozens of threads about people without their names in the title. The ones with names in the titles are well known celebs or commentators who make a living in the media game and therefore have a well known name.

The thread title is neutral and not judgmental. You two are White knighting.

 

[Samseau]

Maybe she doesn't wear her wedding ring outside because it would attract some Somali pedo to try and steal it?

We do not know whether she is married or not, but you seem to be using your assumption that she is not in order to make the title of this thread as negative as possible.

It was reported by Jean-Francois Gariépy, who claimed personal contact with Shiloh on his X acct, that she has been with the same man for six years, and that they have known each other for 10.

It is disappointing to me that in an environment where doxxing is a weapon to destroy people's financial lives, ruin their reputations, and utilized to explicitly sic mobs of psychopathic and homicidal mkultrantifa morons to their white victims, as the Somali pedo filmer and other blacks are doing, that you default to a negative banner and demand proof of marriage, when any personal information given can lead to the harm of a woman and her family.

Some random twitter post is your proof? And the tweet doesn't even claim she's married. She's not wearing a ring. She's not married. This is how the world works for the last 8000 years, literally since the times of Abraham. If a man wanted to marry a woman he gave her a ring for her finger.

You claim to read the lives of the saints in your username, and yet you celebrate this woman who is obviously beholden to the sin of wrath, posting memes of her in the humor thread like she's a saint? Do you actually read the lives of the saints?

Then you call her a Queen, which is homosexual or jogger language. Why are Whites degenerating down to homo and Black euphuisms to support their women? Yikes.