^I wonder if these women DINKs would want to have Brad Pitt's kids? I have a feeling muh career and muh income wouldn't matter anymore.
Rise of the DINKs (Final Civ Death Stage)
- Thread starter Samseau
- Start date
Caduceus
Heritage
I agree.
Have you considered the possibility that Musk is just a frontman for other billionaires who prefer to remain in the shadows, meaning he isn't really the brains or financing behind the things his companies do ?
I have. He looks OK and possibly even beneficial/supporter of free speech among other things, but I'm on record as stating that I am undecided about what his true aims are.
I generally believe that very few rich, "genius" types are legitimate in that they are their own making in the modern day. We likely agree, or at least agree to an extent on this topic to where our disagreements would just be on minor details.
That's part of what I was getting at. Again, focus on how I mentioned that they were mid and career or at least monetarily pretty successful for a historical person. That means they are what we think they are, which is women who believe that they, being 5.5s, deserve 8s or higher.
Agree. There are no accidental billionaires. The whole "just work harder bro and you can be a billionaire too" is just a scam that only normies believe. When you dig deeper into the story of any billionaire there are always suspicious factors in the background.
Yes I think deep down inside women naturally understand that we men would prefer a giggly and fun 18 year old waitress to their tired 35 year old HR manager ass any day of the week.
But because they wanted a career their female hamster will backwards rationalize that men would prefer a "strong independent woman" because it would be too painful for them to admit that they are no longer desirable. Women don't live in reality. A low value man is at least honest enough to admit to himself that he is low value. A low value woman can never admit it to herself. That is the difference between men and women.
The other thing is irrespective of their income levels its shocking how rare it is for women even the high income women to have a decent net worth unless they either inherited money or gained it from divorce raping a man. The "strong, independent woman" 35 year old female lawyer probably has a net worth of $20,000 and is renting a high end apartment and spending all of her money on leasing an expensive car, buying Gucci Handbags and expensive shoes and brunching with her friends and taking "girls trips" to Italy and Jamaica.
If we are talking about women who aren't being supervised by a boyfriend or husband or father than its probably something like 1 out of 1000 women that are actually financially responsible. Meaning that in reality they aren't even monetarily successful because their high income didn't even translate into high net worth.
And notice how you see all those cliched articles early 30s women write about how they are happy to become the "cool and wealthy wine aunt" in the future. But in reality its all cope because usually the wine Aunt's are broke unless they got the money through inheritance or divorce raping a man.
Almost every single female millionaire or billionaire in the world, including the US did NOT earn the money. She either inherited it or got it through divorce. Stunning and brave!
Even the ones who are seemingly self made for example a female entrepreneur who started a company and then grew it into a large company, in reality they may have started the enterprise (makeup company, clothing company, etc) but quietly in the background it was usually the husband or father or some other male figure who steered it into being a successful enterprise.
There is nothing more depressing and pathetic than the wine aunts.
Not sure about other Anglo countries, but in the US female business owners and CEOs are often figureheads who are there so that the business qualifies for various perks as a "woman owned" or "woman led" business.
How about wine aunts who have dogs/cats for kids?
True, but I don't think I've ever met a wine aunt who doesn't have a few pets as kid substitutes.
Yes, I know a couple of exceptions to what people pointed out but here robot reveals the "rub" of the situation, which is that if you somehow made it to the C-suite for years, you can't even tease out if it was just DEI nonsense in the first place, not merit based.
Aside from DEI nonsense you also have the issue of a huge number of women sleeping their way to the top. Although this rarely ever gets talked about or mentioned. People just act is if it only applies to celebrities and the like. But in reality even a large number of female middle management employees etc just slept with a bunch of men to get promoted to that position.
This is certainly the case in my company. The men sit for years…decades even, with no chance of promotion. Meanwhile women come and go and are rapidly promoted up into management within just a few years. Then again, I live in a feminist society that is in love with socialism, communism, feminism, and LGBT blah blah BS.
If this now a discussion of transhumanism and ageing, I'd like to point out that, from a very macroscopic point of view, there are really just two forces in the world - The Holy Spirit, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The latter makes no exceptions and knows no mercy. Even mountains and stars age and die. And the "perennial" (organisms capable of reversing aging) organisms still have to dump entropy somewhere into their environment, plus, they're a lot less complex than mammals.
As for the actual subject of the topic... almost every female "achiever" (they're not exactly Noethers, but we're also not Fermis and Diracs, so, cut them some slack) in academia fits into the same AWFL template. May be except the "A" part. I suspect social media is a primary culprit, but the problem was there before, SocMed just acts like an amplifier with immense gain.
As for the actual subject of the topic... almost every female "achiever" (they're not exactly Noethers, but we're also not Fermis and Diracs, so, cut them some slack) in academia fits into the same AWFL template. May be except the "A" part. I suspect social media is a primary culprit, but the problem was there before, SocMed just acts like an amplifier with immense gain.
The DINK phenomenon is very real here in SoCal. Its astonishing how many or these women walk around frowning all day with their miserable little dogs... I like that in the video he calls dogs fake children. Its true. I used to think dogs could be classified as parasitic creatures, since they manipulate their owners by faking pleasure to receive food and care. Yet, with these wretched DINK "dog moms", I'm starting to think the human woman is a parasite on the animal. It's truly sad.
What does that stand for?
This is funny. Speaking of template, I had a couple in mind when I bullet pointed the characteristics of what I considered classic DINKs, and they weren't from California, but were from the southwest part of the USA (I think). I think the California thing is almost a meme at this point, though.