Last edited:
Pearl Davis: "Just Pearly Things"
- Thread starter starlight
- Start date
She is part of the problem...
She would probably be happier moving to an Islamic country where her impulses to make online videos of herself would promptly be met with a beheading... like other women before her. <facepalm>
She wouldn't be beheaded in a muslim country, she would have been slapped by her father for misbehaving and married off as a virgin, and wouldn't end up as the single mom of a black kid like Pearl will.
Is Pearl really dissing Candace here? What a stupid ****.
Much to your enjoyment I suppose? Damn, Pearl is right, women truly do hate other women.
Yes, Candace has been doing reaction videos to Pearl's content and trying to diss Pearl because Candace takes deep offense to Pearl's thesis that "men are inherently smarter than women." In response Pearl has simply claimed that Candace wouldn't be as successful as she is if she was an ugly man instead of an attractive woman. Pearl has also been on this rant recently about how many "conservative" women are really low key career driven feminist wolves in sheep's clothing and this has also gotten under Candace's skin. In addition, they are apparently in some type of beef over Crowder... not really sure who he is, but apparently Candace did/said something shady regarding him. Regardless, I like Candace too, and contrary to what it may seem like I'm not really keeping up with all the female on female drama
Last edited:
You're kidding me right? YOU are the one who actually started this thread?
Figures, classic woman move to ask a man a question she already knows the answer too in order to beef with him while having no intention of listening to his perspective, much less being persuaded by his superior logic. Incredibly manipulative tradcon "femininity" in action with no genuine interest in entering into a dialogue, much less considering a man's "thoughts" on an issue. It's all about manipulation, attention, shaming, and "being right" from a woman who has already made her mind up because she's a know it all. And this is why after I refuted every criticism of Pearl that you could muster that you could not admit to ONE good thing about her, or concur with ONE thing that she has ever said. It's just personal attack after personal attack with no intention of arguing in good faith.
And so my question to you my little underhanded darkstar is what is your connection to Pearl? Are you a content creator who is jealous of her success? Is a friend of yours a podcaster in an adjacent competitive space with Pearl? I mean, you didn't just wake up one day with a bee in your bonnet about some random "blacked," anti-feminist, hypocritical, yet highly successful chick on the internet that you seemingly hate for no reason did you? If so, then I will repeat your words back to you:
And yet here you are entertaining us all with your five page thread on Pearl Davis who according to you is a "waste of time." I mean, do you see your own hypocrisy in all this?
"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." - John 8:7
It's all quite interesting, because as much as I like some of Pearl's content I would never have even considered starting a thread about her on this forum. No, leave it up to a manipulative, condescending woman to do that.
The interesting thing about Pearl is the natural disdain she has for women's BS and how easily a lot of these manosphere/right-wing ideas imprint on her in real time. I find this unique. It's almost like she felt cheated out of something by her gender. The way she seems happy when men are making sense or being provocative, like it has some kind of healing power behind it. Probably a victim of feminism in some way or another. Be interesting to know if something happened or she just grew more and more pessimistic, as a mid. The little girl who got everything except the prince?
A superior alternative, Leonarda Jonie.
A superior alternative, Leonarda Jonie.
This whole response is so strange and emotional and hyperbolic... I can't tell if you're being serious or satirical...You're kidding me right? YOU are the one who actually started this thread?
Figures, classic woman move to ask a man a question she already knows the answer too in order to beef with him while having no intention of listening to his perspective, much less being persuaded by his superior logic. Incredibly manipulative tradcon "femininity" in action with no genuine interest in entering into a dialogue, much less considering a man's "thoughts" on an issue. It's all about manipulation, attention, shaming, and "being right" from a woman who has already made her mind up because she's a know it all. And this is why after I refuted every criticism of Pearl that you could muster that you could not admit to ONE good thing about her, or concur with ONE thing that she has ever said. It's just personal attack after personal attack with no intention of arguing in good faith.
And so my question to you my little underhanded darkstar is what is your connection to Pearl? Are you a content creator who is jealous of her success? Is a friend of yours a podcaster in an adjacent competitive space with Pearl? I mean, you didn't just wake up one day with a bee in your bonnet about some random "blacked," anti-feminist, hypocritical, yet highly successful chick on the internet that you seemingly hate for no reason did you? If so, then I will repeat your words back to you:
And yet here you are entertaining us all with your five page thread on Pearl Davis who according to you is a "waste of time." I mean, do you see your own hypocrisy in all this?
"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." - John 8:7
It's all quite interesting, because as much as I like some of Pearl's content I would never have even considered starting a thread about her on this forum. No, leave it up to a manipulative, condescending woman to do that.
I already posted what I thought about her and why in this thread. I agree with other people's perception of her instead of yours. I'm sorry that I don't agree with you.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Well how else can manosphere ideas be pushed into the mainstream?
True. Pearl is just repeating stuff said by men for the past 20 years. But if men say the same stuff female listeners will just brush them off as being "incels". Whereas if a woman says it there is a small chance (maybe 1%) that some of it will get through. If Pearl can get even just on average 10 women per video she puts out to realize that feminism is nonsense then she has done more good than harm. There are a lot of things I do not like about Pearl but overall her influence is a net positive.
A good message can be somewhat curtailed by the person saying it acting accordingly (or not), but the message remains the same. If you are telling the truth in some capacity, typically over time it will be a net positive.
Reasons men should never open up:
The top 4 comments on this clip are gold:
1. Crying in front of women is like bleeding in front of sharks.
2. ANY vulnerabilities WILL be weaponized against you.
3. When men tear up, women dry up.
4. Women absolutely will test you by asking you for things they don't want you to give them.
The top 4 comments on this clip are gold:
1. Crying in front of women is like bleeding in front of sharks.
2. ANY vulnerabilities WILL be weaponized against you.
3. When men tear up, women dry up.
4. Women absolutely will test you by asking you for things they don't want you to give them.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
I wonder what the Christian answer to this is in terms of “deception.”
At what level is it fine to deceive and mislead a woman? And let’s be real, if you refuse to open up or cry in front of a woman, that is on some level deceptive.
Men should not cry in front of others. Even when I had relatives die I didn’t cry in front of my crying mother because I wanted her to feel comforted. I did my crying alone in my room.
By the way I think men should only cry if something is extremely serious like one of your relatives dies or you get diagnosed with terminal cancer or your wife had stillbirth etc. Anything less than that level of seriousness men should not be crying.
Calisto
Catholic
How so?
There is a right time and place for everything, and most times aren't right for crying.
Not crying is not being deceptive. Expressing oneself using words is the proper way. Just don't lie, that's all.
"Cultural programming"
Are women this stupid? Don't answer that.
I have no axe to grind against any human, but it's pretty clear we've done the experiments and 99% of what modern people say regarding race, sex, human differences, anything to do with egalitarianism is LIES