Pearl Davis: "Just Pearly Things"

starlight

starlight

Protestant
Heritage
Woman
What are your thoughts on this YouTuber?

From my perspective, I don't see how a blacked, 30+ unmarried woman, without children can argue with anyone about the state of men and women's relations. She comes across as everything a man does not want...

She only reiterates talking points put forth by others and is quite unoriginal. And I'm kind of disappointed that other forum members might actually consider her opinion...
 
starlight said:
What are your thoughts on this YouTuber?

From my perspective, I don't see how a blacked, 30+ unmarried woman, without children can argue with anyone about the state of men and women's relations. She comes across as everything a man does not want...

She only reiterates talking points put forth by others and is quite unoriginal. And I'm kind of disappointed that other forum members might actually consider her opinion...
Click to expand...
She did bring up the Jewish thing.

But let's be real... no men listen to a word women say about politics or really anything for that matter.

We all saw how Ann Coulters turning out.
 
I tried listening to the recent Michael Knowles interview with her and had to turn it off. I found her irritating, unoriginal and generally just full of bad ideas.
 
Lawrence87 said:
Her entire stance is undermined by the fact that she isn't married
Click to expand...
She's actually very anti-marriage in the context of modern society. She constantly tells men that in the current society to avoid marriage. I think I heard her say once that she would be okay with being a live in girlfriend instead of having a long time lover marry her, which is strange cause she's supposed to be a practicing Catholic. Then again, she did say once that she was thinking of renouncing Catholicism since she think it places too much emphasis on venerating a woman (Mary) so who knows how serious she is about her faith.

There's this Orthodox Christian debate channel (The Crucible) that she's pretty friendly with and she's been putting a lot of these classic red pill ideas into the hosts (Andrew and Rachel Wilson). It's strange to see the Wilsons complain about how no one is having children and about sexual degeneracy but at the same time saying men shouldn't get married. Now they do say they believe in sacramental/religious marriage but they think only Eastern Orthodox Christian marriages are true marriages. Since the vast majority of people are not EO Christians does this mean most people should just live the red pill lifestyle and not care about any sort of marriage at all? That would seem to lead to the exact sort of society that the Wilsons constantly complain about. This is an example of how Pearl's ideas aren't really of help even if she does call out a lot of the Clown World stuff when it comes to issues related to feminism.
 
Lawrence87 said:
Her entire stance is undermined by the fact that she isn't married
Click to expand...
I disagree with this. I'm not saying she sees everything clearly, but one can see things clearly without being married. She's not counseling people already married, so you're missing the point entirely, I would argue.
 
starlight said:
She only reiterates talking points put forth by others and is quite unoriginal.
Click to expand...
She made a controversial, unoriginal tweet a while ago:
IMG_2967.jpeg


“16 year olds are cringe”.

Saying someone is cringe says nothing about their physical attractiveness. Tim Pool is inadvertently saying “16 year olds are indeed hotter than 26 year olds, but I can’t openly agree because it would cost me sponsors, so I will point out how they’re immature or ‘cringe’ to make it appear as if I’m disagreeing.”

Of course 26 is still a relatively young age for babymaking, but it shouldn’t be the age of the women when having her first baby, meanwhile the average age of marriage for women in the West is past that.
 
Last edited:
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
She made a controversial, unoriginal tweet a while ago:
View attachment 17130


“16 year olds are cringe”.

Saying someone is cringe says nothing about their physical attractiveness. Tim Pool is inadvertently saying “16 year olds are indeed hotter than 26 year olds, but I can’t openly agree because it would cost me sponsors, so I will point out how they’re immature or ‘cringe’ to make it appear as if I’m disagreeing.”

Of course 26 is still a relatively young age for babymaking, but it shouldn’t be the age of the women when having her first baby, meanwhile the average age of marriage for women in the West is past that.
Click to expand...

Nobody was talking about mental state. The statement is a fact, 16 year olds are hotter than 26 year olds. That's a biological guarantee, by the way. Now, one could argue that for some women, 18-22 might be hotter than 16, and that might be true. But 26 actually is the age I've found to be the clear end to a given girl's hotness = all downhill from there, relative to her hottest days.
 
Shaquilleoatmeal said:
She made a controversial, unoriginal tweet a while ago:
View attachment 17130


“16 year olds are cringe”.

Saying someone is cringe says nothing about their physical attractiveness. Tim Pool is inadvertently saying “16 year olds are indeed hotter than 26 year olds, but I can’t openly agree because it would cost me sponsors, so I will point out how they’re immature or ‘cringe’ to make it appear as if I’m disagreeing.”

Of course 26 is still a relatively young age for babymaking, but it shouldn’t be the age of the women when having her first baby, meanwhile the average age of marriage for women in the West is past that.
Click to expand...

Yes, this kind of statement exactly supports the point I was trying to make which is that she takes manosphere talking points from years ago and then acts as if she just thought those ideas up herself. Her whole schtick is: "gril repeats stuff men said a decade ago online."
 
starlight said:
Yes, this kind of statement exactly supports the point I was trying to make which is that she takes manosphere talking points from years ago and then acts as if she just thought those ideas up herself. Her whole schtick is: "gril repeats stuff men said a decade ago online."
Click to expand...
Yes, this is all trad women online. That's why it's sad, because it just seems like we are yet again picking on them, but the truth is that all of this stuff has been capitalizing on just another market. Part of it is that the social consensus is mildly changing, that is somewhat true.

Women think that men are being mean to them when they just level with them about nature, biology, and roles or tasks. It's mostly just neuroticism or disdain for the way life is. I don't think female saints are under any delusion that they can be "better" than men in many things; they are aware that all humans can be more advanced in the spiritual realm if they put their heart and mind to it.
 
starlight said:
Yes, this kind of statement exactly supports the point I was trying to make which is that she takes manosphere talking points from years ago and then acts as if she just thought those ideas up herself. Her whole schtick is: "gril repeats stuff men said a decade ago online."
Click to expand...

That is because when men say these things, they are called creeps, weirdos, perverts, and pedophiles. They are kicked out of school, lose their jobs, friends, and even family. Sometimes they even are brought to court on civil charges, or falsely accused on criminal charges.

There are basically no consequences for women, however, who can pretty much say whatever they want, short of proclaiming an assassination attempt on the President or something to that degree, and people will either get annoyed with them or ban their social media posts at worst.

The entire reason this forum is anonymous, as well as why the entire Manosphere movement was online in the first place, was to avoid the above dynamic and speak the truth without suffering the massive social consequences attached to the truth.

It's been working very well. There have been large social changes in America since the rise of the internet. It's too bad we can't cash out on speaking the truth like a "trad" girl can, but whatever, I think most men are satisfied that evil is being pushed back.
 
I think she does a good job of going after modern women. Young women are probably more likely to actually hear what she's saying because it's coming from a "youngish" fairly successful woman who is not fat and ugly and all tatted up. She also seems fairly humble (she calls herself a 5 when she's a 6) and I think she'd agree that she learned most of her stuff from reading and listening to men. Can't fault her for that. Most of what I know I also learned from others.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top