Pearl Davis: "Just Pearly Things"

PurpleUrkel said:
I think she does a good job of going after modern women. Young women are probably more likely to actually hear what she's saying because it's coming from a "youngish" fairly successful woman who is not fat and ugly and all tatted up. She also seems fairly humble (she calls herself a 5 when she's a 6) and I think she'd agree that she learned most of her stuff from reading and listening to men. Can't fault her for that. Most of what I know I also learned from others.
Click to expand...

I don't understand the physical beauty ratings for you guys...

Her face looks like a female Quasimodo to me... No offense to her but it is what it is, imo. And, she's so abrasive and extremely masculine...

She's not trying to "reach out" to young women and actually help them turn their lives around... If she really wanted to help women better themselves in the real world, she would use her family fortune (which she has...) to help get real women off the street.

Her "debate" skills rely on "gotcha's" for less informed people (like OF girls... which is not even low hanging fruit but mostly dead) rather than actual back and forth debate.

I don't remember, but did Lauren Southern do a "gofundme" for the documentary "Farmlands" about White genocide in South Africa? She was actually on to something and literally get "FED'd".
 
starlight said:
Her face looks like a female Quasimodo to me... No offense to her but it is what it is, imo. And, she's so abrasive and extremely masculine...
Click to expand...
I don't think she's attractive really. I wouldn't say shes ugly either really just seems kinda like a normal looking woman.

I do legitimately think that traits can make a woman attractive. An average looking woman to me becomes attractive if she is sweet and feminine and I'd definitely pick the average feminine woman over a "hot" feminist. But somehow I don't think Pearl has attractive traits either.

I think shes just one of those internet women, who instead of picking up a following by showing her private parts, nets simps by saying stuff they agree with. But ultimately she's a feminist, because she thinks as a woman she has a role in the online political discourse. If she was really anti feminist she would be looking after her kids and caring for her husband.
 
starlight said:
I don't understand the physical beauty ratings for you guys...
Click to expand...
Its an age/stage of development thing. I'm in my 50's and so Pearl who is 28 is pretty much a 6 by default. When I was in my 20's she would have been a 4 to me and I wouldn't have given her so much as a glance, much less a head swivel. Admittedly though, I'm a bad person with fairly low beauty standards who has taken down some real hedge hogs over the years. I hope The Lord can forgive me.
 
starlight said:
What are your thoughts on this YouTuber?

From my perspective, I don't see how a blacked, 30+ unmarried woman, without children can argue with anyone about the state of men and women's relations. She comes across as everything a man does not want...

She only reiterates talking points put forth by others and is quite unoriginal. And I'm kind of disappointed that other forum members might actually consider her opinion...
Click to expand...

I found this video when researching about this lass. Pearl always gave me a questionable-vibe, but this video finally explains it.



The lad in the video reacts to and gives a better explanation of Britanny Venti (yes THAT girl whom Roosh had a row with a long time ago) digging into Pearl's history and revealing she's a grifting fraud.
 
Based_Christian_Dude said:
I found this video when researching about this lass. Pearl always gave me a questionable-vibe, but this video finally explains it.



The lad in the video reacts to and gives a better explanation of Britanny Venti (yes THAT girl whom Roosh had a row with a long time ago) digging into Pearl's history and revealing she's a grifting fraud.
Click to expand...

Interesting... I knew she was most likely some level of grifter and a little hypocritical but I had no idea that she, currently, lives her personal life in total opposition to what she says in her videos. I don't think she believes a word of what she says... It's like finding out a self-proclaimed vegan is secretly eating meat or something lol
 
starlight said:
Interesting... I knew she was most likely some level of grifter and a little hypocritical but I had no idea that she, currently, lives her personal life in total opposition to what she says in her videos. I don't think she believes a word of what she says... It's like finding out a self-proclaimed vegan is secretly eating meat or something lol
Click to expand...
Sadly that's the state of society and internet fame and fourtune. Anyways, we should avoid giving her anymore attention.
 
starlight said:
I don't understand the physical beauty ratings for you guys...

Her face looks like a female Quasimodo to me... No offense to her but it is what it is, imo. And, she's so abrasive and extremely masculine...

She's not trying to "reach out" to young women and actually help them turn their lives around... If she really wanted to help women better themselves in the real world, she would use her family fortune (which she has...) to help get real women off the street.

Her "debate" skills rely on "gotcha's" for less informed people (like OF girls... which is not even low hanging fruit but mostly dead) rather than actual back and forth debate.

I don't remember, but did Lauren Southern do a "gofundme" for the documentary "Farmlands" about White genocide in South Africa? She was actually on to something and literally get "FED'd".
Click to expand...

Speaking of Lauren Southern, who was that girl she was friends with who ran for mayor of Toronto about 8-9 years ago? She was just as big as LS and I think worked for Rebel Media at some point.

Anyone remember?
 
Maddox said:
Speaking of Lauren Southern, who was that girl she was friends with who ran for mayor of Toronto about 8-9 years ago? She was just as big as LS and I think worked for Rebel Media at some point.

Anyone remember?
Click to expand...
I remember. Her name is Faith Goldy. She was called all kinds of names by the media: "white supremacist", "anti immigration", etc.

As for Rebel News, (((Ezra Levy))) fired her because she appeared on the Daily Stormer podcast while in Virginia (Charlotteville?).

Edit. Just realized she showed her Christian faith openly due to her cross necklace. (I think she was Catholic).

faith-goldy-rebel-media.PNG
 
budoslavic said:
I remember. Her name is Faith Goldy. She was called all kinds of names by the media: "white supremacist", "anti immigration", etc.

As for Rebel News, (((Ezra Levy))) fired her because she appeared on the Daily Stormer podcast while in Virginia (Charlotteville?).
Click to expand...

Yes, that's the girl. I had high hopes for her as a female leader of the trad con movement as I thought she's be great for getting other women to follow her. But after she lost that election, she just disappeared from the scene.
 
Maddox said:
Yes, that's the girl. I had high hopes for her as a female leader of the trad con movement as I thought she's be great for getting other women to follow her. But after she lost that election, she just disappeared from the scene.
Click to expand...
My memory may be vague -- I think she disappeared once she got married so I wouldn't be surprised if she has kids by now. As for when she ran for Toronto's mayoral election, she was not a fan of Canada's out-of-control immigration, which she was outspoken about it.

Edit. Most recent article is from 2023 where some guy from "Canadian Anti-Hate Network" group went after Goldy for campaign finance violation.

www.thestar.com

Faith Goldy, far-right 2018 Toronto mayoral candidate, faces campaign finance charges

Faith Goldy, whose controversial past includes promoting white supremacy, is scheduled to appear in court April 12.
www.thestar.com www.thestar.com
 
Last edited:
I understand the criticisms of Pearl, whether justified or not... She comes from money, she's a manosphere copy cat for simps, she doesn't practice what she preaches (not married with children... though she does suggest that the selfless act of marriage may not be for everyone, including herself), she's not feminine and she's "ugly" (which she admits to in the below video), she's an attention whoring gossip queen for likes and money, etc. But she still is out there saying decent enough things that I find interesting enough to listen to from time to time. It's just entertainment, but not completely mindless, and at least she's making an attempt to hold women accountable (with the occassional JQ call out for bonus points). We need more women like Pearl out there calling bullsh*t on the selfish careerist anti-feminine hypergamous monkey branching sluttdom that is so prevalent in "modern" women.



At about the 12 minute mark she mentions Lauren Southern (have no idea who she is) in a somewhat negative light, so not sure if that's what inspired the hit piece(s) on Pearl like the one posted above? Not that concerned with it all, and not too interested in the "truth" behind Pearl, I personally just find some of what she says to be relevant and fairly on point with regards to the destruction of modern women.
 
Last edited:
I agree we need women like Pearl because sadly in today's society women are more likely to listen to things when they are said by a woman rather than a man. The fact she is hypocritical or unoriginal etc can be overlooked for the benefit of a woman saying it so other women might listen (still only a slim chance as women do not like hearing the truth).
 
Wutang said:
It's strange to see the Wilsons complain about how no one is having children and about sexual degeneracy but at the same time saying men shouldn't get married.
Click to expand...
Simple, they are grifters who need clicks and views. I first noticed these creeps when they did a smear show on Brother Augustine. Digging into their past revealed that they are not the people they pretend to be.
 
GodfatherPartTwo said:
Simple, they are grifters who need clicks and views. I first noticed these creeps when they did a smear show on Brother Augustine. Digging into their past revealed that they are not the people they pretend to be.
Click to expand...
I'm assuming you are referring to the news that's come out since then that both the Wilsons had gotten divorced from previous spouses and that Rachel in particular actually had kids with two different men, one of them out of wedlock. Shows even the online Orthobro crowd isn't immune from these kind of scandals. What makes it more jarring is how harsh the two of them are against "degenerates". It doesn't justify the behavior of the people that criticize but you would think that their past would make them consider "taking the plank out of their eye" first especially considering other Christians didn't come hard on them when they were in the process to converting to Orthodoxy the way they've come down on other people who have converted after a long period of sin.

I would apply this to Pearl as well. I don't get why her own behavior gets overlooked from people who prop her up. I don't see how she's too much different from they Ashley St. Clair grifter types only she's doing it with red pill rather than political material.
 
First of all, Pearl is not ugly. That doesn't mean I'd rate her high in attraction regarding sex, which is almost as important big picture. Also, all people on the internet are click related, and have to self promote and find a niche. It's good and bad, mostly bad since mostly people resort to survival or exaggerated/fake stuff.

As for Wilson, I think he's right you have to seek and destroy, but he also thinks a big war is coming that would "fix things". I don't know if that's true but we are due. I've said it before and I'll say it again, you basically have to just stop paying attention to western women and let them die without attention. Go off to foreign lands like the guys that had to sail to find a new life. It won't be many that do, but that's what happens when we have "peacetime" and this many people born into the world in the last 50 years with all the other tech, money printing, welfare, feminism, etc.
 
PurpleUrkel said:
I understand the criticisms of Pearl, whether justified or not... She comes from money, she's a manosphere copy cat for simps, she doesn't practice what she preaches (not married with children... though she does suggest that the selfless act of marriage may not be for everyone, including herself), she's not feminine and she's "ugly" (which she admits to in the below video), she's an attention whoring gossip queen for likes and money, etc. But she still is out there saying decent enough things that I find interesting enough to listen to from time to time. It's just entertainment, but not completely mindless, and at least she's making an attempt to hold women accountable (with the occassional JQ call out for bonus points). We need more women like Pearl out there calling bullsh*t on the selfish careerist anti-feminine hypergamous monkey branching sluttdom that is so prevalent in "modern" women.



At about the 12 minute mark she mentions Lauren Southern (have no idea who she is) in a somewhat negative light, so not sure if that's what inspired the hit piece(s) on Pearl like the one posted above? Not that concerned with it all, and not too interested in the "truth" behind Pearl, I personally just find some of what she says to be relevant and fairly on point with regards to the destruction of modern women.
Click to expand...

Australia Sucks said:
I agree we need women like Pearl because sadly in today's society women are more likely to listen to things when they are said by a woman rather than a man. The fact she is hypocritical or unoriginal etc can be overlooked for the benefit of a woman saying it so other women might listen (still only a slim chance as women do not like hearing the truth).
Click to expand...
Ehh... I don't know... aren't there enough boobtubers already?

Yes, women are more likely to listen to other women (just like men listen more to other men) but it doesn't work if it's not compelling, if it's not genuine. And after this discussion, I realized that is why her content is so off-putting to me, because it is not genuine. Which means she is basically a liar (and I despise liars). That was the "je ne sais quoi" that I couldn't quite figure out until now.

There are plenty of Christian youtube channels. For example:
m.youtube.com

Ascension Presents

Ascension Presents seeks to present the truth and beauty of the Catholic faith through media, and to answer the longings of the human heart with the transformative power of the Gospel. Visit www.ascensionpress.com to learn more. Ascension Presents is owned and operated by Ascension Press.
m.youtube.com m.youtube.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top