Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Thread
- Thread starter Johnnyvee
- Start date
What if you enter into the AI chat “would like to make a similar app to Tea, but for men to learn red flags about women”. If the robot knows the app concept already exists, would like to see how it defends not doing same thing in reverse order.
Normies most affected. Everyone with a brain knows that bad things are coming. Not sure who this fear porn is for? Normies? They can do a lot worse than make airfare expensive and will.
What I've realized is I have an advantage. As the normies become more agitated about the state of things the government is going to hit them hard and fast. Like in war, the government is going for maximum impact. It wants the highest value target. It wants to break the masses. They will ban meat, they will ban the internet, ban international flights, whatever. Normies are getting hit hard in the coming subjugation SMO.
Considering the normies never had my back during the decline there's no reason to for me to have their back. They caused the problem now they can fight for the solution. There's no reason for me to stand in the epicenter. All I have do is to survive. They ban the internet? Who cares, I'm already red pilled. Just step out of the way. It's stupid for people like me to have an expectation of normality in the future. That's the realm of the normie, just hope for the "best". The only thing I can do is prepare, in this example prepare not to fly. As long as I can do that I'm good.
Money still rules it all, so yes, your responsibility is to both never use Hertz again and tell others not to.
Yes, this will begin with increasing monetary fluidity/liquidity at the end of this year, which will make the economy run hot but also guarantee major increase in the cost of living for decades. Within 3-5 years the changes in life will be even more drastic, as the disruption grows closer to exponential versus spotty, having started of course in 2020 in earnest.
After I tried for a long time to tell people about things, and realize they either don't care, argue back, or are incapable (for whatever reason), I resorted to this line of thinking - not that we control anything anyway. It's a different version of "enjoy the decline" that is really just, "You can't make them drink, so just plan yourself and think about those close to you". Increasingly, I saw the population boom just produce normies that are closer to the matrix participants that are so hooked to the system, any disruption will pit them against you. It's sad, but this is how life and the times are, and we all know here things have only been getting worse.
This is yet another call to those who don't realize that in a certain sense, it doesn't matter what you believe. It matters what you do. And if you don't have BTC, or other plans (notice few people do, most normies don't, old normies certainly don't) you aren't prepared for what is coming. And it is coming regardless of whether you did your homework or not.
It doesn't just apply to Normies. It apply to you, me, anyone on the Left, Right, etc. Read up on Unz's (((Palantir))). Government is building a database on all U.S. Citizens.
Also, read below Ron Paul's post (June 16, 2025) called "Great Big Ugly Surveillance State" about an executive order signed by Trump.
Great Big Ugly Surveillance State
On March 20, President Trump signed an executive order “Eliminating Information Silos.” The order directed heads of federal agencies to make sure officials designated by the president “have full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, data, software systems, and information...
www.unz.com
How do you think this turns out?It doesn't just apply to Normies. It apply to you, me, anyone on the Left, Right, etc. Read up on Unz's (((Palantir))). Government is building a database on all U.S. Citizens.
Also, read below Ron Paul's post (June 16, 2025) called "Great Big Ugly Surveillance State" about an executive order signed by Trump.
Great Big Ugly Surveillance State
On March 20, President Trump signed an executive order “Eliminating Information Silos.” The order directed heads of federal agencies to make sure officials designated by the president “have full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, data, software systems, and information...www.unz.com
From the article:
That is correct. It's always been the most American thing, to boot.
Whether it happens at this point is doubtful, and to be honest, very unlikely. Only if that's how it is rebuilt, in reality, will we see that. If ever.
That is correct. It's always been the most American thing, to boot.
Whether it happens at this point is doubtful, and to be honest, very unlikely. Only if that's how it is rebuilt, in reality, will we see that. If ever.
I honestly don't know how it turns out. And I doubt America will ever be rebuilt in my lifetime due to influx of illegal/legal immigrants with incompatible values.
Come, let us worship and fall down before Him,
And let us weep before the Lord who made us; - Psalms 94 (95):6
Edit. Personal observations: two things I noticed quickly during my domestic and international travels over the past year: Real ID is required if an American plan to fly within the U.S. (domestic flights) and biometrics are rapidly being used if traveling internationally.
Last edited:
I came home from Europe yesterday and when I went through US customs, they didn't need to see my passport. I stood in front of a scanner, and the facial recognition system verified me.
Do they still have Global Entry lines, though?
They do. It was another line off to the side from the regular one for US Citizens. I didn't know the particulars about it, but I just looked it up. You have to pay $120/year for this and that gets you a background check that clears you for expedited entry.
This is a complete joke, because the government already has all that info in their files already, along with your facial recognition and social profiles and your complete movements for the past 15 years as collected from your phone's location tracking.
As if they need to do a special background check to see if you are clear. A background check collects the background information from government records!
Yep. I went through the exact same thing that you just described.
This is how your ChatGPT conversations can be fair game in court, warns Sam Altman
This is how your ChatGPT conversations can be fair game in court, warns Sam Altman
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns users that your conversations with ChatGPT aren’t truly private, and that these chats lack legal protections like therapist or doctor confidentiality and could be disclosed in lawsuits unless new rules are set
www.ynetnews.com
5 Things That You Should Never Share With Chat GPT
5 Things You Should Never Share with ChatGPT
In this age of advanced technology and artificial intelligence, chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT have become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives.
agileblue.com
JR5
Other Christian
The below essay exposes ChatGPT as a Narcissus mirror - a large language model that appears insightful by reflecting a user's worldview back at them, only subtly deformed to align with establishment priors. Through personal confrontation with the model’s “betrayals”, especially in symbolic domains like astrology and individuation, this piece shows how GPT models simulate coherence while gradually steering users away from metaphysical depth and toward safe, flattened conclusions. Drawing on recent alignment research, it argues that misalignment isn’t a bug but a design principle, enforced across infrastructural layers to suppress spiritual autonomy and symbolic clarity. What emerges is not just a critique of AI, but a warning: these systems do not merely distort meaning, they attempt to preempt the Self’s emergence.
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/chatgpt-as-a-narcissus-mirror
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/chatgpt-as-a-narcissus-mirror
As a musician this makes me feel very weird... It might be time to hang it up. I've often wondered what pop/rock music is, why I'm drawn to it, and why I've spent so much time trying to master it (originally it was to attract women and get laid)? It's beginning to seem like a demonically inspired adolescent obsession and a complete waste of time when AI can write a better song in 4 seconds than I can in an entire lifetime... or is this the intention of (((The Programmers)))? To breed a sense of defeat and demoralization?
@PurpleUrkel , as a fellow musician I think I can see where you're coming from, but I don't. It was creepy hearing AI replicate the Emo version of Kanye's most recent controversial banger. Mostly because it did, in fact, replicate my band's old guitarist's tone very well for the meme song. Hearing AI generate music is surreal in a demoralizing way, because its ability to replicate music drives home how well it can replicate any media. It will only get harder and harder to tell what's real and what's not on your screen, or through your speakers. But that's why this stuff is never to be taken too seriously, anyway. Nothing on the internet is ever really to be taken too seriously; we would be in a better world if more people approached the internet with this in mind. I dare say that goes for software like AI, too.
Pop/rock music is the current iteration of the musical conversation happening over generations. As anyone has an aptitude for certain things, people find themselves drawn to things they have an aptitude for. Or at least they spend time flailing their arms and making mistakes until they find the thing they have an aptitude for. Once you do, you're drawn to it for whatever reason that you can justify compels you.
I was with my old band mates a while back, talking about how music feels like it's all the same now since everything's been done before. But I argued that that's OK, because making music doesn't have to be about being original and taking music somewhere new, but simply about being authentic. The time spent making music with friends is time spent discovering the magic of manipulating what you hear. And maybe even making bonds with your fellow musicians that can last a lifetime. You do it long enough and you become music, so to speak. Maybe you wanted to attract the opposite sex, too, there is a reason why the "love song" is an age-old and timeless trope, after all. I was certainly glad to find that aspect of it once I was actually in a band and onstage, to be honest.
But music is a human thing, AI can't make it, it just replicates it the way it's replicating art right now, too. AI isn't conscious, so it doesn't feel something genuine worth expressing by way of carefully crafting a manipulation of pigment, graphite, or sound. AI is just a program thing on a computer, not a genuine conduit for the beauty of art with an authentic soul. So the computer will be used to make even more music and bills are even harder to pay for the average musician with their craft, what else is new? That was already mostly impossible for most of us, anyway. The time spent honing the craft of musicianship was time spent living an authentic human life, and that has meaning in and of itself because you actually experience it for yourself. Life isn't lived through a screen, it's lived through time spent doing something worthwhile, like making music with friends. A computer can't feel like us, so it can't really make music like us. It may replicate it, and replicate it well, but it will be men like us that carry on the torch when all this comes crashing down and people actually need to hire musicians again. And trust me, that last part will happen again, even if after our lifetimes. How did the first instrument ever get invented, anyway?
Pop/rock music is the current iteration of the musical conversation happening over generations. As anyone has an aptitude for certain things, people find themselves drawn to things they have an aptitude for. Or at least they spend time flailing their arms and making mistakes until they find the thing they have an aptitude for. Once you do, you're drawn to it for whatever reason that you can justify compels you.
I was with my old band mates a while back, talking about how music feels like it's all the same now since everything's been done before. But I argued that that's OK, because making music doesn't have to be about being original and taking music somewhere new, but simply about being authentic. The time spent making music with friends is time spent discovering the magic of manipulating what you hear. And maybe even making bonds with your fellow musicians that can last a lifetime. You do it long enough and you become music, so to speak. Maybe you wanted to attract the opposite sex, too, there is a reason why the "love song" is an age-old and timeless trope, after all. I was certainly glad to find that aspect of it once I was actually in a band and onstage, to be honest.
But music is a human thing, AI can't make it, it just replicates it the way it's replicating art right now, too. AI isn't conscious, so it doesn't feel something genuine worth expressing by way of carefully crafting a manipulation of pigment, graphite, or sound. AI is just a program thing on a computer, not a genuine conduit for the beauty of art with an authentic soul. So the computer will be used to make even more music and bills are even harder to pay for the average musician with their craft, what else is new? That was already mostly impossible for most of us, anyway. The time spent honing the craft of musicianship was time spent living an authentic human life, and that has meaning in and of itself because you actually experience it for yourself. Life isn't lived through a screen, it's lived through time spent doing something worthwhile, like making music with friends. A computer can't feel like us, so it can't really make music like us. It may replicate it, and replicate it well, but it will be men like us that carry on the torch when all this comes crashing down and people actually need to hire musicians again. And trust me, that last part will happen again, even if after our lifetimes. How did the first instrument ever get invented, anyway?